bristolbigorangef
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2012
- Messages
- 140
- Likes
- 38
If he gets Steele and Currie had Leach then something is just not right. Steele is much much farther down the list than Leach.
Like I said, it is a touchy subject, and I understand your point completely. I definitely do not mean anything personal against Tee, and really hope Im not coming across as saying that hes not an intelligent guy. Im just being honest and saying that its one of those things that is always somewhat in the back of my mind when thinking about Tee as head coach, at least at this point in his career and coming into this crazy situation right now at UT. Maybe thats not fair on my part for even thinking about it, but Im just being honest that it does concern me a little.
NO WAY Leach is hired while UT takes the "high morals" road pertaining to the SchiaNO debacle. For those who don't know, Leach locked Adam James (son of ESPN analysis Craig James) in a closet while at Texas Tech. No way can UT hire anyone associated with ANY SCANDAL especially using "high morals" as the out on SchiaNO. Forget Leach!
Go listen to Fulmer's statements!!
The Adam James situation is total BS cooked up by his daddy who used his ESPN platform to lobby against a coach who wasnt giving his kid enough playing time. Everyone knew that in 2009, and everyone still knows it.
Sorry, but I'm still a bit confused.
Out of all the possible canidates, Mike Leach was probably the best of the bunch. Leach sent over the agreement papers to be the next HC.......but the brass fires him......so....why fire him when he already agreed upon being the next HC? and does that mean the brass doesn't want Leach at all?