New York City

the tweet starts with a reference to the 2.5 million NYC Catholics. that's a lot more inclusive than a few hundred clergy. your response would include those people.
Which would have been a more valid criticism than the initial one accusing me of calling all Catholics pedos.

However there were still multiple single event examples provided in the tweet that were never acknowledged and are still being ignored
 
Which would have been a more valid criticism than the initial one accusing me of calling all Catholics pedos.

However there were still multiple single event examples provided in the tweet that were never acknowledged and are still being ignored
your response doesn't specify the one off events. I even asked you about the one off events/individuals and you couldn't say if they fell under the "pedo" label you were totally not applying to all catholics.

your argument would hold water if you could point to any of those individuals involved being a pedo, or even the accusation. but you tied catholics wanting catholics to be included in consideration of the city they live as people/the right wanting pedos involved in everything. it was a bad argument regardless of the subject.
 
The tweet complained about who wasn't invited, the NYC clergy, or what event want attended. I commented on that and suddenly I had called all Catholics pedos. It's a huge stretch of my comment since all Catholics were never referenced and it's not in good faith imo. But I get it - wagons circled
I don't think the wagons are circled. Hog is unfaithed. I am not Catholic.

I don't see me, Louder, and hog riding you just because. That's not our style. I think you worded something poorly and the explanations have doubled down on the how the post was written.

For the record, you don't strike me as someone who is prone to broad brush statements. Which is part of the reason it surprised me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
your response doesn't specify the one off events. I even asked you about the one off events/individuals and you couldn't say if they fell under the "pedo" label you were totally not applying to all catholics.

your argument would hold water if you could point to any of those individuals involved being a pedo, or even the accusation. but you tied catholics wanting catholics to be included in consideration of the city they live as people/the right wanting pedos involved in everything. it was a bad argument regardless of the subject.
You're right, in the first to ever make the reference to a Catholic priest being a pedo. Being such an obscure reference I should have clarified and researched all parties before daring to post something so controversial
 
I don't think the wagons are circled. Hog is unfaithed. I am not Catholic.

I don't see me, Louder, and hog riding you just because. That's not our style. I think you worded something poorly and the explanations have doubled down on the how the post was written.

For the record, you don't strike me as someone who is prone to broad brush statements. Which is part of the reason it surprised me.
could have easily explained it away with his first response saying that his wording came across more broadly than he intended, and explained it. but he has doubled down to multiple posters.
 
You're right, in the first to ever make the reference to a Catholic priest being a pedo. Being such an obscure reference I should have clarified and researched all parties before daring to post something so controversial
so you are right back to all catholics are pedos because some catholics are pedos. you really aren't helping yourself.

you didn't reference A priest. you responded to a tweet covering at least 2.5 million people. even when challenged you can't even link the specific priests mentioned to an accusation to explain away the "a priest" part of your response.
 
You're right, in the first to ever make the reference to a Catholic priest being a pedo. Being such an obscure reference I should have clarified and researched all parties before daring to post something so controversial
Come on, what would your response have been had someone posted that a local Imam hadn't been invited because muslims are terrorists? Thats essentially what you did.
 
Last edited:
Come on, what would your response have been had someone posted that a local Imam hadn't been invited because they are terrorists? Thats essentially what you did.
How many times has something like (Muslims are terrorists)that been posted on here with zero pushback? Much worse things said daily about Muslims and not a peep. Make one tongue in cheek current events reference about the right given the current climate with Epstein and all hell breaks loose. I'll never understand this board
 
How many times has something like (Muslims are terrorists)that been posted on here with zero pushback? Much worse things said daily about Muslims and not a peep. Make one tongue in cheek current events reference about the right given the current climate with Epstein and all hell breaks loose. I'll never understand this board
😂😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
How many times has something like (Muslims are terrorists)that been posted on here with zero pushback? Much worse things said daily about Muslims and not a peep. Make one tongue in cheek current events reference about the right given the current climate with Epstein and all hell breaks loose. I'll never understand this board
I think we've busted others down for similar.

The dude who posted about being afraid when a muslim gets on a plane is still referenced and mocked.

Right or wrong, I think posters expect more of you bc of mod status. Not me though. I 've learned to not expect anything from you ;)
 

Advertisement



Back
Top