New Orleans Saints Hire Jim Chaney As Offensive Analyst

#2
#2
Yes, It should, unless he has a “no mitigation” clause in derogation of common law. The mitigation of damages is a default rule of law and despite misinformed belief, there is no requirement that mitigation of damages be expressed in a contract. It’s implied in law and an injured party has a duty to mitigate damage.
 
#4
#4
Yes, It should, unless he has a “no mitigation” clause in derogation of common law. The mitigation of damages is a default rule of law and despite misinformed belief, there is no requirement that mitigation of damages be expressed in a contract. It’s implied in law and an injured party has a duty to mitigate damage.
Lol....most of the contracts have a mitigation clause in them. Question is, how little are the Saints paying to get him?
 
#8
#8
Lol....most of the contracts have a mitigation clause in them. Question is, how little are the Saints paying to get him?

Well it doesn’t hurt to spell out agreed terms on what it means to “mitigate.” But I recall a big fuss on Gus’s contact because it was being reported that he did not have mitigation of damages clause in his contract. And I’m thinking, so what? He still has to mitigate his damages!

With that said, I know executive level employees will sometimes have a”no mitigation” clause where the parties expressly agree they don’t have to mitigate their damages. But that’s the exception, not the rule.
 
#11
#11
Yes, It should, unless he has a “no mitigation” clause in derogation of common law. The mitigation of damages is a default rule of law and despite misinformed belief, there is no requirement that mitigation of damages be expressed in a contract. It’s implied in law and an injured party has a duty to mitigate damage.
chaneymitigation.png


http://tennessee.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Jim-Chaney-football.pdf
 
#15
#15
Does Chaney have kids attending UT?
Not sure but he and his wife definitely wanted to retire in Knoxville. They fell in love with the place during his first stint which is why he stayed on when Dooley asked him to. Had Butch not had such a radically different offense (and had Butch asked him) he probably would have never left.
 
#22
#22
Yeah the game has passed him by. ;) Pruitt says hi.
Chaney is an very smart guy. If Pruitt had asked him to run a version of what Heupel runs... he would have done it. His early O's were the forerunners of what Heupel and others do.

Fulmer hired Pruitt IMO because he still didn't want to admit that he was rightly fired. He wanted to prove that his old school, 1990's philosophy of football still worked. In Pruitt he found a willing disciple. Pruitt also wanted to believe that championships could still be won with defense, safe ball control O, and "managing" the game.

Chaney relished the idea of coaching in K'ville again. He likes UT. He gave Pruitt what he asked for... because he's not the HC and does not determine style of play.
 
#25
#25
Yes, It should, unless he has a “no mitigation” clause in derogation of common law. The mitigation of damages is a default rule of law and despite misinformed belief, there is no requirement that mitigation of damages be expressed in a contract. It’s implied in law and an injured party has a duty to mitigate damage.
Good to know ty
 

VN Store



Back
Top