New Emails New Clinton Foundation Questions

#27
#27
jvol1 said:
Where has Newt Gingrich's money come from post house? If we had controls on PAC spending it might fix this to some degree.
Click to expand...

Deflect, deflect, deflect. "Hillary just murdered someone? Well, I bet Marco Rubio is a lousy tipper!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#30
#30
davethevol said:
Deflect, deflect, deflect. "Hillary just murdered someone? Well, I bet Marco Rubio is a lousy tipper!"
Click to expand...

It's a valid point to mention that Republicans have made ridiculous amounts of money in just the same way the Clintons have. You only mention the one because it suits your view.

Your living in fantasy land on the subject of murder, but that's your business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#32
#32
jvol1 said:
Where has Newt Gingrich's money come from post house? If we had controls on PAC spending it might fix this to some degree.
Click to expand...

Newt has a consulting firm that works on issues with various lobbying groups, some speeches and I believe he occasionally lectures at some colleges and universities around GA. He was a history professor for a while.
 
#33
#33
Vol737 said:
Newt has a consulting firm that works on issues with various lobbying groups, some speeches and I believe he occasionally lectures at some colleges and universities around GA. He was a history professor for a while.
Click to expand...

Newt is worth about 18 million...still Bill is worth more than him, both Bushes, and Carter combined..life lesson, if you want to get rich go the nonprofit route.
 
#34
#34
VolnJC said:
Newt is worth about 18 million...still Bill is worth more than him, both Bushes, and Carter combined..life lesson, if you want to get rich go the nonprofit route.
Click to expand...


I used to work for a publication that covered health care policy in Florida. One day I was speaking to one of the lobbyists for the All Voluntary Hospital Association, and he told me "There are three types of hospitals. For profit. Not for profit. And not for obvious profit."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#36
#36
jvol1 said:
It's a valid point to mention that Republicans have made ridiculous amounts of money in just the same way the Clintons have. You only mention the one because it suits your view.

Your living in fantasy land on the subject of murder, but that's your business.
Click to expand...

I firmly believe both sides consist of really bad people. However, that's not the topic at hand. Each situation should be dealt with appropriately. If Hillary wasn't in a position of power, she'd be spending the rest of her life in prison based on the evidence so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#37
#37
VolnJC said:
Newt is worth about 18 million...still Bill is worth more than him, both Bushes, and Carter combined..life lesson, if you want to get rich go the nonprofit route.
Click to expand...

No doubt. Thought I saw Bill/HRC combined net worth is over $100M. I wouldn't walk across the street to hear them speak, much less pay them that kind of money for a speaking engagement.
 
#40
#40
davethevol said:
I firmly believe both sides consist of really bad people. However, that's not the topic at hand. Each situation should be dealt with appropriately. If Hillary wasn't in a position of power, she'd be spending the rest of her life in prison based on the evidence so far.
Click to expand...

Jeez, just no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#41
#41
ClearwaterVol said:
And yet Trump has commanded 17M+ for a 17 speech contract. That is more than the Clintons have earned for speeches.
Click to expand...

Candidates speaking at a $25,000 dollar a plate fund raiser is different than getting millions of dollars "donated" to the Clinton Foundation BY BOTH SIDES -foreign power wanting to buy, and US military industrial manufactures- to broker arms sales.

It well known. It is proven. It is ignored by lib-dems.

What say you HiLIARly supporters? Whether or not this particular deal made for Saudi Arabia had or had not the United States, the Middle East, and the worlds best interests as basis:

The obvious and evident $10.9 million quid pro quo of a Secretary of State should forever disqualify this weapons brokering thug from political office.

Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department

"In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#42
#42
VolnJC said:
So the State Department was helping Lance Armstrong?
CpdGjppWcAA_MIy.jpg:large
Click to expand...

Evidently not.
 
#45
#45
jvol1 said:
It's a valid point to mention that Republicans have made ridiculous amounts of money in just the same way the Clintons have. You only mention the one because it suits your view.

Your living in fantasy land on the subject of murder, but that's your business.
Click to expand...

Actually in this context, not even close. But thanks for playing.
 
#46
#46
jvol1 said:
It's a valid point to mention that Republicans have made ridiculous amounts of money in just the same way the Clintons have.
Click to expand...

Aside-I'm neither Republican nor Democrat nor Libertarian nor Green. I don't support any party. A pox on all their houses. I'm more centrist... maybe.

But I do totally agree with that Green Party speaker that the Democratic Party movers and shakers made sure Clinton would be their candidate. They really don't "give a flying ****" about you. From my youth in a several generations Yellow Dog Southern Democrat Pork Barrel benefitting household, I believe that. It's "Let's Make a Deal" and most of that is under the table. That is pure fact. FACT.

https://youtu.be/yTnEP9olNoQ

The repubs ... proly very close second. But second none the less.

But, in any correct evaluation of truth; whether or not any other politicians from any other party "do it too"; that is no justification, by any stretch, for allowing HiLIARly to skate.

----------------
Now jvol1 your statement above is as if you know it for fact. Tell us who, when, what deal, how much. Provide verifiable documentation just like I did. Put up or shut up. Frankly, I hope you do because we are close in this country to needing to hit reset and vote every last one out of office within as short a time as possible. Six years for the Senate.
--------------------
Clinton has shown, over and over and OVER AND OVER: by the quid pro quo monies she got "donated" to the Clinton Foundation as a senator, her mis-handling of Ben Ghazi as Secretary of State, her apparent quid pro quo arms brokering as the SOS, and the abject manipulative disregard she has for truth and security protocol with her, "I'm just a dumb blonde, that security stuff found on my server, it just is beeyond little ol' me how it got there"!

If that's true, she's just too incompetent to be POTUS and Commander in Chief.

But it's not true. She used that server to subvert the law. She KNEW she was doing it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#47
#47
ClearwaterVol said:
Jeez, just no.
Click to expand...

Jeez, just yes.

If you are an attorney, and if you have past military experience you would know that being careless with classified information is a federal felony.

Even if she wasn't hacked, and evidence shows she was, the exposure was careless as reported by the FBI.

Then there is the issue of lying to congress under oath and lying to the FBI which is a felony under oath or not. Don't believe me, ask Martha Stewart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#48
#48
KentheOrange said:
Jeez, just yes.

If you are an attorney, and if you have past military experience you would know that being careless with classified information is a federal felony.

Even if she wasn't hacked, and evidence shows she was, the exposure was careless as reported by the FBI.

Then there is the issue of lying to congress under oath and lying to the FBI which is a felony under oath or not. Don't believe me, ask Martha Stewart.
Click to expand...

All we are asking for is consistency. Don't think that's too much.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top