Netflix

#5,152
#5,152
kiddiedoc said:
The Ballad of Buster Scruggs was very entertaining. I'm scrolling to see if there is anything i want to watch before my cancelation takes effect.
Click to expand...

Battered Bastards of Baseball is the best thing that will ever be on Netflix
 
#5,159
#5,159
The Crash was a solid documentary. I will be showing it to my kids when they are teenagers so they can learn about toxic relationships.

I thought it was pretty telling that his friends were saying the relationship was toxic, and her friends were saying it was fine/normal. The one unanswered question is that she texted his Mom that he was the one who endangered them by jerking the wheel in the previous incident, but I will chalk that up to her trying to control the narrative. It's compelling, but I can't reconcile it with everything else that happened (or was told to us, anyway).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MOOOOONEY, SpecialKVolfan and K-town Vol Fan
#5,160
#5,160
I just finished Love on the Spectrum. I'm glad there's a season 5. I don't know. It's just a show that is very endearing and heartwarming to me when you need something like that to watch.
 
#5,161
#5,161
Pennheel said:
I just finished Love on the Spectrum. I'm glad there's a season 5. I don't know. It's just a show that is very endearing and heartwarming to me when you need something like that to watch.
Click to expand...
One of the guys featured on the show works at a Publix down the road from us. Super nice guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennheel
#5,164
#5,164
n_huffhines said:
The Crash was a solid documentary. I will be showing it to my kids when they are teenagers so they can learn about toxic relationships.

I thought it was pretty telling that his friends were saying the relationship was toxic, and her friends were saying it was fine/normal. The one unanswered question is that she texted his Mom that he was the one who endangered them by jerking the wheel in the previous incident, but I will chalk that up to her trying to control the narrative. It's compelling, but I can't reconcile it with everything else that happened (or was told to us, anyway).
Click to expand...

There’s a couple of more documentaries about this incident.

I made the mistake of going down the rabbit hole.

1. The girl is very unlikable and egotistical (that’s not justification to be put in prison)
2. The boyfriend who died in the crash had his own issues and wasn’t the saint/martyr that he is being portrayed as. (Didn’t deserve to die like that)
3. Her parents are horrible people and did an injustice in how they raised her.
4. Her lawyer was terrible. Based on that she should get a retrial.
5. She was a 13 year old freshman and he was a 16 year old junior or senior when they began dating. He was 20 and she was 17 when they lived together.
6. On the night of the accident they went to a party to get high. From all the information available their drugs of choice were weed, shrooms, and acid. Why would a 20 year old man take a 17 year old girl to a party to get high and trip and then allow her to drive
7. If you listen to the interviews by the investigators you will notice a pattern of leading the witnesses to incriminate the defendant. It wasn’t really an investigation as it was a witch hunt.
8. I think she is guilty of dui manslaughter and not murder
 
#5,165
#5,165
MOOOOONEY said:
There’s a couple of more documentaries about this incident.

I made the mistake of going down the rabbit hole.

1. The girl is very unlikable and egotistical (that’s not justification to be put in prison)
2. The boyfriend who died in the crash had his own issues and wasn’t the saint/martyr that he is being portrayed as. (Didn’t deserve to die like that)
3. Her parents are horrible people and did an injustice in how they raised her.
4. Her lawyer was terrible. Based on that she should get a retrial.
5. She was a 13 year old freshman and he was a 16 year old junior or senior when they began dating. He was 20 and she was 17 when they lived together.
6. On the night of the accident they went to a party to get high. From all the information available their drugs of choice were weed, shrooms, and acid. Why would a 20 year old man take a 17 year old girl to a party to get high and trip and then allow her to drive
7. If you listen to the interviews by the investigators you will notice a pattern of leading the witnesses to incriminate the defendant. It wasn’t really an investigation as it was a witch hunt.
8. I think she is guilty of dui manslaughter and not murder
Click to expand...

Good info. How do you reconcile the max acceleration?
 
#5,167
#5,167
MOOOOONEY said:
There’s videos that she posted on social media of her filming the speedometer going 90 mph plus.

She was young, dumb, and high.
Click to expand...

Did anybody say she was high? Didn't they all say no, when it could get her off the hook, and toxicology was inconclusive? She doesn't remember? Weed doesn't make you wanna drive crazy anyway. It makes you drive like a grandma. There is no way you accidentally accelerate all the way through a brick wall.

If the credible claim is mushrooms, I'd give her reasonable doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MOOOOONEY and Vol423
#5,168
#5,168
n_huffhines said:
Did anybody say she was high? Didn't they all say no, when it could get her off the hook, and toxicology was inconclusive? She doesn't remember? Weed doesn't make you wanna drive crazy anyway. It makes you drive like a grandma. There is no way you accidentally accelerate all the way through a brick wall.

If the credible claim is mushrooms, I'd give her reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
Yes. Drug tests came back negative. She wasn't high.
 
#5,169
#5,169
n_huffhines said:
Did anybody say she was high? Didn't they all say no, when it could get her off the hook, and toxicology was inconclusive? She doesn't remember? Weed doesn't make you wanna drive crazy anyway. It makes you drive like a grandma. There is no way you accidentally accelerate all the way through a brick wall.

If the credible claim is mushrooms, I'd give her reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...

The text messages show that they were going to a party that night to trip.

If I remember correctly the toxicology test wasn’t done until 3 days later. It was alleged to have been ordered and then canceled the morning of the wreck. THC was in here system but the investigators stated because she smoked a lot it wouldn’t have affected her. Weed may not be the full culprit but it could have played a role.

Mushrooms were found at the scene.
 
#5,171
#5,171
MOOOOONEY said:
They didn’t come back negative.

She tested positive for THC 3 days later
Click to expand...
Yes, but THC stays in your system for a long time AND was not what they actually cared about. Weed doesn't make anyone drive into a building at nearly 100 miles per hour witht he gas pedal on the floor and zero application of breaks. They were looking for hallucinogens.
 
#5,172
#5,172
Vol423 said:
Yes, but THC stays in your system for a long time AND was not what they actually cared about. Weed doesn't make anyone drive into a building at nearly 100 miles per hour witht he gas pedal on the floor and zero application of breaks. They were looking for hallucinogens.
Click to expand...

No but it slows your reflexes

Her defense team did a piss poor job defending her.

They should have went with a jury trial instead of a bench trial.

The prosecution couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top