Turd Ferguson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,835
- Likes
- 0
I'm confused. If it was 4th and 1 on his opponents 30 then I don't see a huge deal. I would have prob kicked the fg, but I wouldn't hold it against him either.
The type of tactics he was using that big0 described are what's bothering me. If he was in fact dropping back 30 yards and chucking it up then that's really lame.
I am not going to waste my time playing in what is supposed to be a legit sim football tourney against a cheeseball. Did you not see dude come in here before anything was even said?Grown man football IS NOT quitting in the 3rd quarter down 2 scores, sir.
You dont have any evidence of 30 yard dropbacks and what he did/admitted is on the line of cheese and not cheese. Fact remains that you quit and he didnt. He doesnt carry the burden of proof. You do. So my opinion is that he wins because you quit. What made you think a forfeit would make sense to plead your case? Just wondering... If you win should you play again for a best out of three? Where does it end?I am not going to waste my time playing in what is supposed to be a legit sim football tourney against a cheeseball. Did you not see dude come in here before anything was even said?
Explain to me how someone could beat a corner blitz with 0 coverage in the backfield with dime coverage to get the time for the crossing routes to go across the football field and get open without getting sacked unless they ran straight back for 15 or more yards with TN qbs? Is that real football? No! Is going for it on 4th and over 3 yards in field goad range real football? No! The lame lag excuse is shady for sure. Finally someone can pass for over 200 yards with the "online lag" but cannot kick a field goal??? Lastly i challenged him to a rematch with the recorder on. So what is your argument now?
I am not going to waste my time playing in what is supposed to be a legit sim football tourney against a cheeseball. Did you not see dude come in here before anything was even said?
Explain to me how someone could beat a corner blitz with 0 coverage in the backfield with dime coverage to get the time for the crossing routes to go across the football field and get open without getting sacked unless they ran straight back for 15 or more yards with TN qbs? Is that real football? No! Is going for it on 4th and over 3 yards in field goad range real football? No! The lame lag excuse is shady for sure. Finally someone can pass for over 200 yards with the "online lag" but cannot kick a field goal??? Lastly i challenged him to a rematch with the recorder on. So what is your argument now?
Really so if i finished the game than people would suddenly see the "evidence"? I challenged dude to a recorded game. Why would i do that if i was lying and outmatched. I think the burden of proof is on him.You dont have any evidence of 30 yard dropbacks and what he did/admitted is on the line of cheese and not cheese. Fact remains that you quit and he didnt. He doesnt carry the burden of proof. You do. So my opinion is that he wins because you quit. What made you think a forfeit would make sense to plead your case? Just wondering... If you win should you play again for a best out of three? Where does it end?
My opinion is the forfeiter doesnt move on. No disrespect.
