'26 NC EDGE Rodney Dunham (Notre Dame commit)

#57
#57
expert prediction for Dunham to Notre Dame. Our recruiting has been suspect this year. that now makes Keys and Dunham we lead for and lost
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jackcrevol
#58
#58
ABtheVolsfan92 said:
expert prediction for Dunham to Notre Dame. Our recruiting has been suspect this year. that now makes Keys and Dunham we lead for and lost
Click to expand...

We always “lead” for kids in the spring that go elsewhere. It isn’t a this year issue.

It’s a no one knows anything in the spring issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexvol, Big Orange#1, therickbol and 5 others
#67
#67
Notre Dame did just picked up another 4* edge from central NC, they've been going hard in the state.
 
#70
#70
Announced today to Notre Dame- yawn.

I was initially really excited about all the guys we “led” for in Carolina.
 
#72
#72
Jackcrevol said:
This one is a head scratcher, same for TK.

But I do think we are going to have a good weekenxd.
Click to expand...
TK makes more sense to me than this one… can’t really deny how good LSU receiving prowess has been..

Even in down years they still throw the ball all around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jackcrevol
#73
#73
RockiesTop22 said:
Announced today to Notre Dame- yawn.

I was initially really excited about all the guys we “led” for in Carolina.
Click to expand...
you need to realize that "led" isn't actually "leading" most of the time. its a meaningless term the writers use to drive up interest in the story.

so often they will translate, "the team talking to me the most" as "leads". it literally could be he spends the most time talking with them because they reach out the most, not because he likes them the most. or how often do we see the team who "leads" change with each visit a guy takes? Its all about driving interest in the story, rather than presenting factual information.

unless there is a direct quote from the player himself its absolutely meaningless.
if the player uses it before taking any visits, its meaningless.
if the player only says it months before commitment, its meaningless to bring up when the commitment finally happens.
 
#74
#74
LouderVol said:
you need to realize that "led" isn't actually "leading" most of the time. its a meaningless term the writers use to drive up interest in the story.

so often they will translate, "the team talking to me the most" as "leads". it literally could be he spends the most time talking with them because they reach out the most, not because he likes them the most. or how often do we see the team who "leads" change with each visit a guy takes? Its all about driving interest in the story, rather than presenting factual information.

unless there is a direct quote from the player himself its absolutely meaningless.
if the player uses it before taking any visits, its meaningless.
if the player only says it months before commitment, its meaningless to bring up when the commitment finally happens.
Click to expand...
I do understand this.. which is why early recruitment I try not to get too involved with.. but it’s still fun to pay attention to and I can’t help but get excited about it.. my bad..

I’ll just tune in for signing day stats
 
#75
#75
RockiesTop22 said:
I do understand this.. which is why early recruitment I try not to get too involved with.. but it’s still fun to pay attention to and I can’t help but get excited about it.. my bad..

I’ll just tune in for signing day stats
Click to expand...

Shiiiii transfer portal days you might as well skip NSD as well and just tune in to the first game of the season to see who’s on the roster 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt, cncchris33 and RockiesTop22
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top