NBA Game Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,961
#1,961
My All-Star team

West Starters

G Stephen Curry
G Chris Paul
F Kevin Durant
F Blake Griffin
F Kevin Love

Reserves

G Goran Dragic
G James Harden
G Damien Lillard
G Wes Matthews
F Chandler Parsons
F DeAndre Jordan
F Dwight Howard

East Starters

G Kyle Lowry
G Lance Stephenson
F LeBron James
F Paul George
F Andre Drummond


G John Wall
G DeMar DeRozan
G Arron Afflalo
F Carmelo Anthony
F Paul Millsap
F Joakim Noah
F Roy Hibbert
 
#1,968
#1,968
BadJerry20 said:
25% is surprising amount for a 6'9 pf? He normally shoots 4 a game. Plus the Clippers schedule without CP3 is east heavy. Ah screw it the Clippers are better off without Paul.
Click to expand...

It seems your problem is you don't know how to interpret stats. They aren't saying in any way, shape, or form that they are better off without Paul. The stat is interesting because it tells you how good the rest of the team is. He may be the best defensive PG in the league. Not to mention the scoring efficiency could be a fluke streak. Not to mention maybe a weak schedule, like you say.

Nobody said they're better off without CP3. Straw man
 
Last edited:
#1,969
#1,969
Notorious B.E.N said:
Coaches picked the bench players, sounds like Huff says he's smarter than NBA coaches? Hmmm
Click to expand...

It's not about being smart.

Also, politics are involved with the picks, it's not necessarily going to who they think is the best. You pretty much have to take Nowitzki and Parker.

I'm not ever saying I'm smarter than anybody else. I'm saying the data is smarter. The funny thing is I know you disagree with some coaches from time to time, so you would be the one who thinks you're smarter than coaches based on your subjective player evaluations.
 
#1,971
#1,971
n_huffhines said:
It's not about being smart.

Also, politics are involved with the picks, it's not necessarily going to who they think is the best. You pretty much have to take Nowitzki and Parker.

I'm not ever saying I'm smarter than anybody else. I'm saying the data is smarter. The funny thing is I know you disagree with some coaches from time to time, so you would be the one who thinks you're smarter than coaches based on your subjective player evaluations.
Click to expand...

I do disagree with coaches sometimes :). But they all voted on these players so the majority of the coaches agreed on these.
 
#1,974
#1,974
n_huffhines said:
It seems your problem is you don't know how to interpret stats. They aren't saying in any way, shape, or form that they are better off without Paul. The stat is interesting because it tells you how good the rest of the team is. He may be the best defensive PG in the league. Not to mention the scoring efficiency could be a fluke streak. Not to mention maybe a weak schedule, like you say.

Nobody said they're better off without CP3. Straw man
Click to expand...

Good lord Huff learn to take a joke.
 
New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top