NBA Finals poll? Who ya got?

All I know is lue had the same look on his face the first two games of the series as he had when Iverson stepped over him
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You're outside your damn mind. He WAS the offense, who else was going to take those shots? George Lynch? Eric Snow? Matt Gieger? Please.

Iverson was a black hole. Once he got the rock there was no getting it back. He didn't know a bad shot.
 
Super weak.

You've convinced me to come halfway. He did need to shoot a lot, he just didn't do it effectively.
 
Super weak.

You've convinced me to come halfway. He did need to shoot a lot, he just didn't do it effectively.
Nobody ever said he was superman. He played his heart out and completely changed the way 6 footers are viewed in the NBA. He wasn't the best but he was never scared. He might notve been the ideal player for a team sport but there was tons about him to admire.
 
Nobody ever said he was superman. He played his heart out and completely changed the way 6 footers are viewed in the NBA. He wasn't the best but he was never scared. He might notve been the ideal player for a team sport but there was tons about him to admire.

I don't really think this is the conversation that I'm having. The conversation I'm having is whether or not scoring less points than attempts is "pretty amazing". That's it.
 
I don't really think this is the conversation that I'm having. The conversation I'm having is whether or not scoring less points than attempts is "pretty amazing". That's it.

Did you see love's or for this series?
 
Not sure what you're asking, but based on context my answer is that Love hasn't played well for the 6 quarters he's appeared in.
I'm drunk and sloppy so don't take that as a deflection. Its just awful how awful he's been.
 
Curry's actually shooting well, he's just not shooting a lot. His turnovers are out of control though.
 
I'm drunk and sloppy so don't take that as a deflection. Its just awful how awful he's been.

He's been bad. Anybody can have a bad 6 quarters. Anybody can have a bad series. All I'm saying with Iverson is call it what it is.
 
So far Curry has only played well when his team is already winning big, in both finals
 
Tyson Chandler was on the Jump the other day. He has really good commentary, I hope he ends up in broadcasting.

Anyway, he was saying after game 2 that even when Curry doesn't blow up, he has such a big impact. His point was that you can't adequately defend the pick 'n roll if it's 4 on 4, and with Curry you can literally have him go talk to Kerr out of the way, and they still have to respect his range and defend 4 on 4.

I was thinking that GS should play Livingston with Curry and Klay off the ball more, because then you have 3 on 3 basically.
 
IDK if he's booth material. You have to talk so much that it takes a special talent to be able to constantly have meaningful insights. Chandler was very good, but only talked for a few minutes and answered direct questions. Not saying he can't do it, I'm just saying it's a different skill set than he exhibited.

He didn't seem too reactionary like a lot in the media and he also seems to be the type (like Jeff Van Gundy) who cares less about how things appear and more about the result. He dismissed somebody's points about body language, which jives with me.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top