Nationalized Voting

#26
#26
Godfatha said:
General rule of thumb is, if you don't want it done to you, don't be willing to do it to someone else. While your guy may be the one making a power grab by the government, the other guy will be able to do so when his turn comes around.
Click to expand...
How is this a power grab, and not an exercise of the power given in the Constitution?
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
#29
#29
Delmar said:
Babble is a good word to use. Personally I think he is getting more unstable by the day. Throwing more 💩 against the wall daily on numerous topics and I think Americans on both sides are starting to notice the insanity and the increased pettiness. I would say that he will need to be replaced but then we get Vance and that could be an utter disaster.
🤦🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
I think I saw something the other day that betting odds having Trump not finish the term at around 30%.
 
#30
#30
MercyPercy said:
Where is the pants shidding coming from? I've seen references to that a lot lately. I mean, I don't doubt it really but that seems to have gotten a lot of traction as of late.
Click to expand...

He definitely sharted big time. And this is on the heels of somebody making the claim last year that he smells like poop all the time. Something about the powder he's using does nothing to mask the smell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#31
#31
DinkinFlicka said:
He may or may not have dumped himself during a presser in tge oval office a few days ago.

You can audibly hear a fart, but the real meat of the clip are the reactions of the two sycophants behind him.

I got a good chuckle out of it.

"Defecon 1"
"Shart of the deal"
"THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS SPLATTER"
"there will immediately be a congressional hearing so Hillary can confess as to how Biden wrapped in Donald's diaper"
Click to expand...

I just found the video, Lmao. POOTUS was the top comment.
 
#34
#34
n_huffhines said:
Spoken like someone who didn't get the point.

I voted Chase Oliver because I care a lot, but if there isn't someone to cast a symbolic vote to, I am not voting in support of people I know are going to use the force of the government to push their bad ideas on America....because I care a lot.

A monkey can cast a vote, and might do a better job than Americans, but people act like it's their golden ticket to civic achievement. You're just voting to force BS on others. Way to go.

You can vote for both parties to grow ICE, subvert the bill of rights, fund genocide in Gaza, etc. but morally I cannot justify any of that stuff.
Click to expand...
I understand the moral views of it... and I appreciate the honesty. All I'm saying is that all the Harris supporters or anti-trump people who couldn't bother voting don't have one bit of reason to bitch about it, since there's so many I'm sure it could've gone the other way if they had just gotten off their asses and voted!
 
#35
#35
Orange_Crush said:
Also LOLing at the logic that defends ignoring what the Constitution says on this when it doesn't suit us, but Trump is wiping his *** with it by not ignoring what it says on this.

You just can't make this stuff up.
Click to expand...
Based on recent information and video Trump needs to wipe his ass with something and since the Constitution is one of his favorite targets it makes sense.

Oh sure this passes the equivalence bar of past actions because not allowing states to prevent citizens from voting is totally equal to just taking over the whole process.🤡

The water pail line is over there ——>
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeardedVol
#36
#36
NorthDallas40 said:
Based on recent information and video Trump needs to wipe his ass with something and since the Constitution is one of his favorite targets it makes sense.

Oh sure this passes the equivalence bar of past actions because not allowing states to prevent citizens from voting is totally equal to just taking over the whole process.🤡

The water pail line is over there ——>
Click to expand...
Can you tell me the specifics of what he meant by that?

USF grad in TN said:
You left out the part of the Constitution that says "Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators."
Click to expand...
NorthDallas40 said:
I’m ok with leaving that out. Because there is zero chance Congress does a thing if they even have the power. This is just Trump wiping his ass with the constitution again.
Click to expand...
Ouch. Just a brutal self-own. "I'm OK leaving the part I don't like out, but Trump is the one wiping his *** with it."

Your hatred is clearly thinking on your behalf.
 
#37
#37
Orange_Crush said:
Can you tell me the specifics of what he meant by that?



Ouch. Just a brutal self-own. "I'm OK leaving the part I don't like out, but Trump is the one wiping his *** with it."

Your hatred is clearly thinking on your behalf.
Click to expand...
Look I’ll make it easy for you Bobby Boucher I’ve got a tee time to make and you are absolutely out over your skis on this particular water carrying tasker. Enjoy convincing everyone else this is a good thing.
 
#39
#39
NorthDallas40 said:
Look I’ll make it easy for you Bobby Boucher I’ve got a tee time to make
Click to expand...

You made it easy the moment you posted "I’m ok with leaving that out." and then accused someone else of not respecting the Constitution. I mean, wow. It's like a neon sign begging to be commented on.

NorthDallas40 said:
and you are absolutely out over your skis on this particular water carrying tasker.
Click to expand...


I seem to remember being told that about a certain image as well. Pardon me for not considering that particular criticism to be worth much.


Enjoy convincing everyone else this is a good thing.
Click to expand...

Changing the subject? Convenient.


Elections are already "nationalized", per the Constitution. It's merely a matter of how (and how much) Congress wants to implement it.

1770134280688.png

1770134305022.png

My argument is not about whether it is good or bad. It's not an "ought" argument. It is an "is" argument,
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#41
#41
Orange_Crush said:
You made it easy the moment you posted "I’m ok with leaving that out." and then accused someone else of not respecting the Constitution. I mean, wow. It's like a neon sign begging to be commented on.




I seem to remember being told that about a certain image as well. Pardon me for not considering that particular criticism to be worth much.




Changing the subject? Convenient.


Elections are already "nationalized", per the Constitution. It's merely a matter of how (and how much) Congress wants to implement it.

View attachment 812107

View attachment 812108
Click to expand...
🏌️wasting your time Bobby! But just up one post from yours you got a live one. Chop chop!
 
#42
#42
Orange_Crush said:
Can you tell me the specifics of what he meant by that?



Ouch. Just a brutal self-own. "I'm OK leaving the part I don't like out, but Trump is the one wiping his *** with it."

Your hatred is clearly thinking on your behalf.
Click to expand...
When you have no argument that's the responses you get..we want rule of law till I don't like what the law says..I'm follow the Constitution till it says what I dont like...
And now we are at the repeating the same things claimed about Biden.
As a gotcha ya...its all rinse and repeat
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN and W.TN.Orange Blood
#43
#43
Good Ol' Charlie Brown said:
Trump's changed up his agenda so much you gotta wonder if he got outside influence.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the influence is from Stephen Miller, Laura Loomer and the rest of the nuthouse incompetents he has surrounded himself with. Most of them belong in a padded room. Hard to believe we are in this position as a country but here we are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and EasternVol
#46
#46
n_huffhines said:
Spoken like someone who didn't get the point.

I voted Chase Oliver because I care a lot. But if there isn't someone to cast a symbolic vote to, I am not voting in support of people I know are going to use the force of the government to push their bad ideas on America....because I care a lot.

A monkey can cast a vote, and might do a better job than Americans, but people act like it's their golden ticket to civic achievement. You're just voting to force BS on others. Way to go.

You can vote for both parties to grow ICE, subvert the bill of rights, fund genocide in Gaza, etc. but morally I cannot justify any of that stuff.
Click to expand...
The group funding genocide is the Islamic Republic on October 7. When Hamas and Palestinians massacred 1200 Israelis and kidnapped 100s.

Interesting how we haven’t heard a peep from you about the massacre in Iran against the Iranian people by the exact same group that supports and funds Hamas in an effort to destroy the only Jewish state.

This is how Huffs selective outrage works.

Is this a news story?

Does it involve Trump? ✅
Does it involve Joos? ✅

Huff: posts

Does it involve Trump? ❌
Does it involve Joos? ❌

Huff: crickets
 
#50
#50
hog88 said:
Just because congress CAN pass laws doesn't mean they should.

This should galvanize both the right and left into support for neutering the federal government.
Click to expand...
We don't live in a world where thing aught to be a certain way...we live in a world where things are a certain way...so are they violating the Constitution with this act?? If no then the moral opinions are not important to the discussion.
And as I have heard you say numerous time if you disagree with way it is there are avenues to change it legally...which seems to be the case here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top