orangemadam
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 3,954
- Likes
- 4,560
The Nobel Peace Prize does actually mean something to people that can hold a meaningful, thought provoking conversation. Since you don't fall in that category, I understand your sentiment.
Nobel peace prize is absolutely useless. Has become a political award. For crying out loud, Yassar Arafat, one of the greatest terrorists of our time won the damn thing about 20 years ago and Obama was given the "award" right after entering office, before he'd ever done anything, and solely because of the things the committee said they "thought he'd do" going forward. And as we now know, he's done anything but promote peace in his two terms in office.
Let me start by saying I have not watched the Heisman since the G.O.A.T. left. Hurd must be the featured back, meaning 75% of the runs minimum. Problem, Butch had to promise Kamara a much expanded role to return. Solution, Kamara still gets 25% of touches and splits time at slot helping not only us out greatly in a position of need, but also himself if successful, improves his stock tremendously. I believe if Dobbs is more consistent then they can not key on Hurd and with Dobbs running ability even tougher. So no more then two losses, minimum 1500 yards and he has this wrapped up. GBO!
Should Hurd have it wrapped up if he puts up the number you suggest? Yes. .
Should Hurd have it wrapped up if he puts up the number you suggest? Yes. However, like many other Tennessee fans, I feel Big10 and Pac12 sportswriters are dead set against voting for a Vol. We got screwed over more than once before by those jerks, and we will again until proven otherwise.
Only way I feel he or any other Vol has an honest shot is if they take the voting out of sportswriters hands, and find a fair and honest system for letting the fans choose who receives it.
If one of our players wins the Heisman, it's because the team is in the National Championship picture. For that to happen, Dobbs is going to have to sling the ball around the field accurately. With that being the case, Dobbs would then be the Heisman candidate from our team.
Hurd isn't winning the heisman and it's not because he's not going to be good this year.
a) he's not the only feature back we have
b) he'll share carries with Kamara and Dobbs
c) the end of the season schedule doesn't set up for any real marquis games that will capture national attention
Just playing devil's advocate here:
We could totally make it to the championship without Dobbs slinging it all over the field. If he can just become slightly more efficient, the defense improves to being a top 10 unit, and Hurd elevates his game as well, then a playoff birth is likely. Basically, the Bama model. Strong run game, efficient, if less than spectacular passing game, stifling defense.
The Bama model still includes forcing the other team to respect the pass by being just accurate enough to be capable of saying "ok fine, we'll go down and put up 7 on you in 6 plays or fewer"
Yeah, but the point stands that Dobbs wouldn't have to be slinging the ball all over the field. He'd just need to be slightly more efficient with his passes. Just hitting one or two deep balls a game would be enough. Bama was middle of the pack in passing offense last year (they finished somewhere in the 60s).