lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 74,878
- Likes
- 44,260
I think you misunderstood the report and this PC. He is saying that they didn't have an option to charge a sitting President with a crime and also that if he was innocent, they could have and would have stated so. I like what Trump is doing for the country right now, specifically the job market and other things, but how could anyone see this and not see it as something bad for Trump? This gives the Dems more ammo to go forward with impeachment IMO.Because it's not a prosecutor's place to say someone is innocent
I hope they try, let's f'ing go. Nothing came out of this, except for the extreme left.I think you misunderstood the report and this PC. He is saying that they didn't have an option to charge a sitting President with a crime and also that if he was innocent, they could have and would have stated so. I like what Trump is doing for the country right now, specifically the job market and other things, but how could anyone see this and not see it as something bad for Trump? This gives the Dems more ammo to go forward with impeachment IMO.
And he needs to be taken to task on that as it directly conflicts with Barr stating the Muell said three times OLC opinion had no bearing on his decision to not charge.I think you misunderstood the report and this PC. He is saying that they didn't have an option to charge a sitting President with a crime and also that if he was innocent, they could have and would have stated so. I like what Trump is doing for the country right now, specifically the job market and other things, but how could anyone see this and not see it as something bad for Trump? This gives the Dems more ammo to go forward with impeachment IMO.