Mueller accuses opponents of offering women money to make ‘false claims’ about him

#231
#231
evillawyer said:


Smells like wire fraud to me.
Click to expand...


18 U.S.C. § 1343
Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.
 
#234
#234
C-south said:
You have to believe her. She’s a hero.
Click to expand...
Believe who? Do you understand the woman in that picture is not named "Carolyne Cass"? She is just another writer at Gateway Pundit. There has still not been a woman step forward and put both her name and face behind an accusation against Mueller... yeah, we heard a name "Carolyne Cass", although there seems to be confusion over how her name is spelled.

These guys are terrible liars.
 
#235
#235
lawgator1 said:
I remember something about this guy in another thread. He's the one who holds alt right lunatic fringe GOP press conferences at the Holiday Inn.

Desperation and fear about what is coming is palpable.
Click to expand...
Nothing is coming from mueller. Nothing has come from mueller. Trump indicted yet or are we relying on the collective indictment count all without trumps name in it?
 
#238
#238
NurseGoodVol said:
Nothing is coming from mueller. Nothing has come from mueller. Trump indicted yet or are we relying on the collective indictment count all without trumps name in it?
Click to expand...
Trump is not going to be indicted. This is about proving collusion between his campaign and the Russian government - which isn't technically illegal. The point is then to use that determination of collusion against the 2020 Trump reelection campaign and also against Republicans who defend him. As I posted in another thread, Mueller seems very close to reaching that conclusion when you look at both Roger Stone's October 3, 2016 tweet in which he predicts WikiLeaks releases which are damaging to Hillary Clinton are to come soon and then look at the e-mails between Roger Stone and Steve Bannon on October 4, 2016 (the very next day). Stone (a Trump surrogate) clearly had advanced knowledge of when the WikiLeaks document dumps would be made and what they contained. Stone even reassured Bannon the WikiLeaks releases that were damaging to the Clinton campaign, would still be coming after Julian Assange had made an announcement to the contrary earlier that same day (October 4th). Mueller has already interviewed Steve Bannon twice. Roger Stone has been caught in several lies regarding his contacts with Julian Assange. Put a happy face on this if you want to... but this looks bad for the "No collusion!" and "Witch hunt!" crowd.
 
#239
#239
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump is not going to be indicted. This is about proving collusion between his campaign and the Russian government - which isn't technically illegal. The point is then to use that determination of collusion against the 2020 Trump reelection campaign and also against Republicans who defend him. As I posted in another thread, Mueller seems very close to reaching that conclusion when you look at both Roger Stone's October 3, 2016 tweet in which he predicts WikiLeaks releases which are damaging to Hillary Clinton are to come soon and then look at the e-mails between Roger Stone and Steve Bannon on October 4, 2016 (the very next day). Stone (a Trump surrogate) clearly had advanced knowledge of when the WikiLeaks document dumps would be made and what they contained. Stone even reassured Bannon the WikiLeaks releases that were damaging to the Clinton campaign, would still be coming after Julian Assange had made an announcement to the contrary earlier that same day (October 4th). Mueller has already interviewed Steve Bannon twice. Roger Stone has been caught in several lies regarding his contacts with Julian Assange. Put a happy face on this if you want to... but this looks bad for the "No collusion!" and "Witch hunt!" crowd.
Click to expand...
Meanwhile at Dimwit HQ......
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top