Movies you've seen recently

Status
Not open for further replies.
#8,077
#8,077
Saw Interstellar today. Good movie, probably 8.5-9 for me. I'd recommend it to anyone.

Movies with time paradoxes always irk me, but at least it was kinda of creative.
 
#8,081
#8,081
Coug said:
I wish Knoxville had a legit IMAX theater, that would be cool.
Click to expand...

I don't know if I could have handled any more. The Regal mini-version was still awesome. That sound... You could hear every word and feel the bass all the way out at the concessions.
 
#8,082
#8,082
Robocop (New)
7.5/10
Not a bad remake,kinda slow in the middle,and I think they could have had more action
 
#8,090
#8,090
Interstellar should be renamed "Inter" because it was far, far, far, from stellar.

Don't even spend your dollar when it goes RedBox.

Story was dumb and the "twists" were easier to figure out than the convoluted spin on the theory of relativity. I'm surprised with that cast, that it wasn't a good movie.

In fact, I want to go back in time and get my two hours back, where is that black hole when I needed it?
 
#8,091
#8,091
37L1 said:
Interstellar should be renamed "Inter" because it was far, far, far, from stellar.

Don't even spend your dollar when it goes RedBox.

Story was dumb and the "twists" were easier to figure out than the convoluted spin on the theory of relativity. I'm surprised with that cast, that it wasn't a good movie.

In fact, I want to go back in time and get my two hours back, where is that black hole when I needed it?
Click to expand...

I knew there was one of you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#8,094
#8,094
37L1 said:
Interstellar should be renamed "Inter" because it was far, far, far, from stellar.

Don't even spend your dollar when it goes RedBox.

Story was dumb and the "twists" were easier to figure out than the convoluted spin on the theory of relativity. I'm surprised with that cast, that it wasn't a good movie.

In fact, I want to go back in time and get my two hours back, where is that black hole when I needed it?
Click to expand...

Seriously? It was nearly 3 hours, btw. Maybe you left too early?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8,098
#8,098
The Amazing Spider-Man 2

-4/10 wtf was that crap? I hate Andrew Garfield as Spidey, I can't stand Emma "Bag of bones" Stone. The kid that played Harry was Turrible. Oh screw it, all but 10 minutes or so was hot garbage.
 
#8,099
#8,099
BadJerry20 said:
The Amazing Spider-Man 2

-4/10 wtf was that crap? I hate Andrew Garfield as Spidey, I can't stand Emma "Bag of bones" Stone. The kid that played Harry was Turrible. Oh screw it, all but 10 minutes or so was hot garbage.
Click to expand...

You realize that the Amazing Spiderman movies were done merely to maintain ownership rights? They do/did not care how good or bad the series really was.
 
#8,100
#8,100
Coug said:
You realize that the Amazing Spiderman movies were done merely to maintain ownership rights? They do/did not care how good or bad the series really was.
Click to expand...

Which is a shame. Disney/Marvel would kill it with Spider-man, in his own movies and the Avengers.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top