Monte on Tennessee

#202
#202
Rock33 said:
We are on page 11......... I just told you guys that the Face of ESPN's College Football crew asked 8 weeks ago if we were over Kitten ........ I also gave you first hand info of how they percieve our comments. AND the thread is growing !!!! What don't you get ?

GTFOIT !!!! NOBODY THINKS ITS NEWS WORTHY BUT YOU !!!!!

Let it go ....................for US please !
Click to expand...
I've been saying for months that everyone needs to get over Kiffin. But seriously, I really don't give a damn what Mo, Larry, and Curly think or say about us on Gameday.
 
#203
#203
medium_monte%20kiffin%20mug.jpg

tennessee.jpg
 
#206
#206
canine_vol said:
The dude is absolutely senile. He will probably have a stroke soon. How good do you think a defensive coordinator that has had a stroke is?
Click to expand...

Can you have any less class? Regardless of how you feel about the guy there is no reason to say anything about his age or his prospects of having serious health issues. Sickening........
 
#207
#207
MrVOL2U said:
I hate the Kiffins more than you can imagine...thats why I launched www.F*ckKIFFIN.com it was a good release....Feel free to enjoy it... I do.
Click to expand...

I apologize for having the temerity to suggest that your post was inaccurate or your use of English was, well, shall we say sub-optimal? I can see that no-one can tell you that you are wrong, but it might be a good idea to see a clinical psychologist to discuss your last suggestion and the emotions that gave rise to it.

:hi:
 
#208
#208
sjt18 said:
Monte is one of the best DC's at any level of football... and like many parents he is blind to many of his son's flaws.

As for UCLA beating UT... seems like the Kiffin's had some hand in that second loss.
Click to expand...

By all accounts, the team loved the elder Kiffin, and he was a great guy. He's going to defend his son; he's trying to ensure he can keep a job in coaching - hence the Daddy Clause in the TN contract, and following him at 70+ to USC. His defenses last year were great against pro-style offenses.

I just have to say a word on Chavis - I thought he was a great DC. He grew into the job, and the defense has been stalwart since '96.

As for the two UCLA losses recently, they are 100% on coaching, without question. It was the same coaching error too - if you gave Crompton enough attempts, the game would slow down for him.
 
#209
#209
kptvol said:
Our defense didn't cause us to lose against UCLA.
Click to expand...

Agree, but I still don't rate the Kiffins much higher than doggy do. IMO, they were trash when they came here, they were trash while they were here, and they ain't changed since they left.
 
#212
#212
utgibbs said:
By all accounts, the team loved the elder Kiffin, and he was a great guy. He's going to defend his son; he's trying to ensure he can keep a job in coaching - hence the Daddy Clause in the TN contract, and following him at 70+ to USC. His defenses last year were great against pro-style offenses.

I just have to say a word on Chavis - I thought he was a great DC. He grew into the job, and the defense has been stalwart since '96.

As for the two UCLA losses recently, they are 100% on coaching, without question. It was the same coaching error too - if you gave Crompton enough attempts, the game would slow down for him.
Click to expand...

Chavis coached two of UT's worst defenses of all time in 2006 and 2007. I don't understand why everyone seems to forget how recently horrible we were. I also seem to remember Monte's defense holding Florida to fewer yards than any team they faced last season, so I guess maybe he did know how to coach against something other than pro-style.
 
#215
#215
well, i'm glad we have wilcox because he's young, knows how to stop the spread (monte didn't) and his defenses consistently were the best in his conference.

rmsmith said:
Ok gotta ask. Why are you glad to have Wilcox? He hasn't coached a game at UT yet but you hold last year against monte?

To me you have to take ut out of the equation. Compare Boise State vs. Tampa Bay. Or wait til this year is complete then see which one was better.
Just for clarification i'm not against Wilcox. I hope he'll do well here.
Click to expand...
 
#223
#223
tennezz said:
It was obvious after the UCLA game that we needed a new DC! How do you like that Monte?
Click to expand...

Monte is over-rated. Has anyone actually looked at the defensive rankings of the Bucs during his tenure? They only had a few really good years. Most of the time, however, they were the middle of the league.
 
#224
#224
fbcgovols said:
Monte is still a hell offa coach
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Like him or not, his D did hold the national champ without a touchdown, or am I dreaming. And as far as the UCLA game . . . . . . the D didn't lose that game, the O did. That's my opinion, ought to be yours . . . .
 
#225
#225
davethevol said:
Monte is over-rated. Has anyone actually looked at the defensive rankings of the Bucs during his tenure? They only had a few really good years. Most of the time, however, they were the middle of the league.
Click to expand...

His defenses were in the NFL top 10 in both points and yards allowed 10 of his 13 years in Tampa.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top