txbo
Never worked for a Vandy grad
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 17,275
- Likes
- 46,729
I'm not taking a shot at those kids. Clearly they are very talented players that excelled on the field. Transfers will never add that special something that it takes to go all the way.
I'm not taking a shot at those kids. Clearly they are very talented players that excelled on the field. Transfers will never add that special something that it takes to go all the way.
Meaning Peyton didn't? Got it.I think that just shows that Tee Martin had something special.
We had 8 guys drafted on day one. The talent was there.Meaning Peyton didn't? Got it.
Every comment you present is making team sports very individual-focused. Leaders lead, but they dont play every possession at every position. Good leaders exist on both good and bad teams. You'd have us believe that if leadership doesn't produce titles, then leadership didn't exist or was ineffective. Talent still matters. So does a bit of luck.
I'm not trying to make a point about Bargo or anybody else. The 2022 team might be the greatest collection of college baseball talent to ever take the field together.... but they couldn't get to Omaha. It takes something special in the locker room to go all the way.... and I don't believe that first year players can provide that. They can certainly contribute in a big way but can't provide that special something.I disagree, we don’t win a national championship without a core of transfers that had huge moments in 2024. If this is about Bargo and wanting him back next year, he’s also a transfer. I guess I’m just confused what the argument even is right now. If it’s claiming we need leadership for next year, I’m not sure Bargo is the solution. He didn’t strike me as one of the more vocal players on last year’s team.
I'm not trying to make a point about Bargo or anybody else. The 2022 team might be the greatest collection of college baseball talent to ever take the field together.... but they couldn't get to Omaha. It takes something special in the locker room to go all the way.... and I don't believe that first year players can provide that. They can certainly contribute in a big way but can't provide that special something.
"Baseball is 90 percent mental. The other half is physical." Yogi Berra
Was there any real leadership from the players that left?It seems that Tony would disagree with you there otherwise he wouldn’t have jettisoned our entire pitching staff to bring in more talented players that will be first-year in the system either as a high school player or transfer portal commit.
To be clear, I’m not saying that leadership and continuity aren’t important in championship teams. They very much are. But that leadership can come from many different places.
Next year’s team also isn’t going to be void of continuity. Marin, Newstrom, Clark, and Abernathy are all going to be major contributes that will be taking similar steps up in responsibility just like Dylan Dreiling and Kavares Tears did as Sophomores. Dean Curley was a true freshmen on that championship team as well.
LOL all you want...It's the same level of rationale that you've presented to this point.LOL. That has all the rationale that can only come from a child or the female persuasion.
Was there any real leadership from the players that left?
Clearly first year players are an essential element in today's game... but I don't believe they can bring the championship glue that a core of C Mo, Burke, Sechrist and Kirby can add.
Exactly. It isn't nearly as black and white as that poster is trying to make it. Sometimes leadership pushes you over the top when everyone is pulling their weight on the field. Sometimes it fails when multiple guys are in slumps and you run up against a good team playing their best on their home field. Sometimes you have great leadership and great talent, and things just dont go your way in a make-or-break moment. It happens, but it isn't proof-positive that leadership does/doesn't exist.I feel like leadership isn’t a tangible thing that is easy to measure. Yes, Christian Moore was very vocal and loud and it was easy to see his impact on the TV, but since I’m not in the dugout I can’t say with confidence if other forms of leadership were present.
Tony is ride or die for Doyle and Fischer so I can’t imagine he’d be as vocally supportive of them if he felt they were poor leaders and didn’t have the skills and intangibles needed to lead a team to a championship. It didn’t work out for us this year, but it didn’t work out for Arkansas either who had a ton of older players on that roster and a lot of continuity on that team.
Again, I didn't say they were "poor leaders". I'm just saying they didn't provide that special "it" factor. Going simply by results.I feel like leadership isn’t a tangible thing that is easy to measure. Yes, Christian Moore was very vocal and loud and it was easy to see his impact on the TV, but since I’m not in the dugout I can’t say with confidence if other forms of leadership were present.
Tony is ride or die for Doyle and Fischer so I can’t imagine he’d be as vocally supportive of them if he felt they were poor leaders and didn’t have the skills and intangibles needed to lead a team to a championship. It didn’t work out for us this year, but it didn’t work out for Arkansas either who had a ton of older players on that roster and a lot of continuity on that team.
Again, I didn't say they "poor leaders". I'm just saying they didn't provide that special "it" factor. Going simply by results.
I don't have a negative opinion about them. Without them this would have been a rough year. That 2022 team had arguably the most talent of any baseball team to ever take a college field.... but they did not have "it" between the ears. They beat themselves because they could not control their emotions... and baseball is a mental game.We’ll just agree to disagree. Championships are part luck. I don’t know how you personally are measuring the “it” factor but I’d say Gilbert, Beck, Tidwell, etc. all had “it” and still didn’t win a championship.
It’s easy in hindsight to say a particular player didn’t have “it” instead of in the moment. I’m a bit surprised you are so cemented in your fairly negative perception of those guys. You are normally extremely positive and level-headed about these things but you seem to almost have a less than favorable opinion about them.
I’m with you here. That 2022 team just so happened to play their worst 2 games of the year against a really hot ND team. Saying that didn’t have “it” when they are arguably the greatest college baseball team is something.I feel like leadership isn’t a tangible thing that is easy to measure. Yes, Christian Moore was very vocal and loud and it was easy to see his impact on the TV, but since I’m not in the dugout I can’t say with confidence if other forms of leadership were present.
Tony is ride or die for Doyle and Fischer so I can’t imagine he’d be as vocally supportive of them if he felt they were poor leaders and didn’t have the skills and intangibles needed to lead a team to a championship. It didn’t work out for us this year, but it didn’t work out for Arkansas either who had a ton of older players on that roster and a lot of continuity on that team.
Peyton's lack of leadership caused Tennessee's defense to give up an average of 42 ppg in the 3 games he started against Florida. Tee's leadership caused Tennessee's defense to only allow 17 points to Florida in 1998. Plus, there was the 64 yards passing he had in that game.Meaning Peyton didn't? Got it.
Every comment you present is making team sports very individual-focused. Leaders lead, but they dont play every possession at every position. Good leaders exist on both good and bad teams. You'd have us believe that if leadership doesn't produce titles, then leadership didn't exist or was ineffective. Talent still matters. So does a bit of luck.