Minutes per points for each player whole season

#51
#51
mudcat1973 said:
tess took 173 fga plus 6 fta total of shots 179 total points score 183 @ 179 divide 183 = .97814 boyd took 84 fga plus 37 fta total of shots 121 total of points score118 @ 121 divide by 118 = 1.02542 latham took fga 93 plus 33 fta total of shots 126 total of points score 108 @ 126 divide 108 =1.66666 if you are going to put free points in points per shots you got to put free attamps. in your points per shots. @ thats why they do not put free points in field goal percents or 3 pointer percents % they keep free throw points out of fg% and 3pts % @ if you are going to put free points into your points per shot math . then you have to put free attampts in your math.... this is before post season stats or before todays game.
Click to expand...
All scoring counts in your efficiency rating and free throws don't count as shots that is why they are a seperate stat.
 
#52
#52
GUNTERSVOL said:
But you might have to factor in +- stuff because the defense’s spacing when she is in the floor creates space that you don’t get from the others. NOT an exact science out there, stats are just stats, she may improve every other player out there.
Click to expand...
Coach Kim evidently disagrees to some extent so I will just leave it at that. If you agree to the premise that she should be playing 20 minutes or more no problem with me more with the current coaching staff. I do agree with how they are using the players and also am glad she is not getting 20 or more minutes a game. I much rather have Boyd, Latham, Spencer, Spearman, Spear, and Whitehorn playing those minutes.

She got 15 minutes today made 1 of 5 shots and otherwise a bunch of zeroes. Boyd played 22 made 2 of 5 and 3 of 4 from the line 3 rebounds 1 assist and 2 steals she played 22 minutes. Latham 3 for 5 7 rebounds 1 assist and 1 steal in 15 minutes and that is the way it has been going for several games.

I do want her to succeed in the minutes she gets, but no please no more minutes I would be happy if they cut it to 12 and added them to Latham.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: volsagain, chuckiepoo and brittannica
#53
#53
still does not show production points per shots if you do not add free atts in . in your goal is do solve points per shots on the court when the defense is guarding you. take free points and atts out then you can solve . points per shot when the defense is guarding the shoter.@ I GIVE YOU THE POINT OF TESS NOT IN THE TOP FIVE AS THIS SYSTEM IS BUILT FOR CREATING YOUR OWN SHOTS. LESS ON PASS AROUND TO GET A GOOD OPEN LOOK. @ heres the other stats on those three players before today@ tess ast 18 blk 3 stl 19 rb 51 to 6 @ body ast 38 blk 3 stl 36 rb41 to 18 @ latham ast 7 blk 6 stl 26 rb 106 to 17 @ those numbers where before todays game @ assist @ blocks@ steals@ rebounds@ turnovers @ is the stats provide dont want debate those . share them because i wrote them down. @ tess would do better where they share the basketball . play ground basketball as not tess strong point. as coach jumper said got to get mime is not tess strong point. @Coach Jumper sorry coach for using your words.
 
#54
#54
mudcat1973 said:
still does not show production points per shots if you do not add free atts in . in your goal is do solve points per shots on the court when the defense is guarding you. take free points and atts out then you can solve . points per shot when the defense is guarding the shoter.@ I GIVE YOU THE POINT OF TESS NOT IN THE TOP FIVE AS THIS SYSTEM IS BUILT FOR CREATING YOUR OWN SHOTS. LESS ON PASS AROUND TO GET A GOOD OPEN LOOK. @ heres the other stats on those three players before today@ tess ast 18 blk 3 stl 19 rb 51 to 6 @ body ast 38 blk 3 stl 36 rb41 to 18 @ latham ast 7 blk 6 stl 26 rb 106 to 17 @ those numbers where before todays game @ assist @ blocks@ steals@ rebounds@ turnovers @ is the stats provide dont want debate those . share them because i wrote them down. @ tess would do better where they share the basketball . play ground basketball as not tess strong point. as coach jumper said got to get mime is not tess strong point. @Coach Jumper sorry coach for using your words.
Click to expand...
love ya mud ;o)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mudcat1973
#55
#55
they do not count free throw attamps or free throw made points in fieldgoal% threepointer% @ so you can not put in a stat for points per shots when the defence is guarding the offence player. do not agree on your stat of points per minuets.
 
#56
#56
RespectAPA said:
.71 points per minute × 1.4 minutes per point = '1', not '1 point'. Points and minutes both cancel out.

A rate and the rate's inverse always multiply to 1. (This is the multiplicativ equivalent of the fact that a number and its negativ always sum to 0)
Click to expand...
Thanks for the clarification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RespectAPA
#57
#57
krichunaka said:
One could make the case that Coach Kim should have phased in her high-octane approach to basketball; because, when all is said and done, and, no matter the suggestions/claims at her Intro, this was to be a two, three year (or more) installment plan. She must have known, as many here have suggested, that the depth of our current roster was not fully-suited, or quite up to the SEC task, especially in this initial season. But then, there was that incredible, 14-0 early-season, and well, here we are.

We really did appear to lack confidence on Sunday. Missing shots, many of them, uncontested, can have that effect. OTOH, we were actually there, or almost there, and in some big games, against three, four, or more ranked opponents, precisely due to the System. How many times did we endure stall tactics, most recently the Georgia Lady's two-minute shoe lacing demonstration? And, remember the Iowa All-American - Lucy Olsen - inexplicably heaving two, game-changing, awful passes ...due to exhaustion? Iowa's starting five committed 23 turnovers! In other words, because of the System, we beat some really good teams; plus, a missed, wide open three, a put back in Nashville, a couple key missed shots or assignments in the Texas and LSU games, or we have at least three more wins. And, very importantly, Talaysia is on the recliner, looking forward to our first SEC Tournament game, Tomorrow, or even Friday. Oh well.

I think what I'm getting at is, that, in year one - Kim Caldwell - we're close. Very close. Rather than a thing of beauty, however, it is oftentimes, disheveled. Yes, a few close games were literally won by exhausting our opponents. Now, we're having to admit to what some have claimed: this approach (with our current personnel) does not always work against the better, deeper teams. However, if you think you're witnessing the finished Kim Caldwell Project, be prepared to be pleasantly surprised. Soon.

I still fear that we will lose against hair-on-fire Vanderbilt, tomorrow. IF we play tomorrow (I believe we will). And, we might lose key prospects, precisely due to the System we run. And yet, we literally have five very promising Ladies, three of them, All-Americans, heading our way! And the pluses-minuses of the portal are just around the corner. So, exciting times, regardless of how the SEC-NCAA Tournaments play out.

Cheers.
Click to expand...
We do play tomorrow. Lots of players saw action today so rest shouldn't be a problem. I'm excited about the future also and am hoping Coach Caldwell gets the thoroughbreds she needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo, th2421 and krichunaka
#59
#59
krichunaka said:
One could make the case that Coach Kim should have phased in her high-octane approach to basketball; because, when all is said and done, and, no matter the suggestions/claims at her Intro, this was to be a two, three year (or more) installment plan. She must have known, as many here have suggested, that the depth of our current roster was not fully-suited, or quite up to the SEC task, especially in this initial season. But then, there was that incredible, 14-0 early-season, and well, here we are.

We really did appear to lack confidence on Sunday. Missing shots, many of them, uncontested, can have that effect. OTOH, we were actually there, or almost there, and in some big games, against three, four, or more ranked opponents, precisely due to the System. How many times did we endure stall tactics, most recently the Georgia Lady's two-minute shoe lacing demonstration? And, remember the Iowa All-American - Lucy Olsen - inexplicably heaving two, game-changing, awful passes ...due to exhaustion? Iowa's starting five committed 23 turnovers! In other words, because of the System, we beat some really good teams; plus, a missed, wide open three, a put back in Nashville, a couple key missed shots or assignments in the Texas and LSU games, or we have at least three more wins. And, very importantly, Talaysia is on the recliner, looking forward to our first SEC Tournament game, Tomorrow, or even Friday. Oh well.

I think what I'm getting at is, that, in year one - Kim Caldwell - we're close. Very close. Rather than a thing of beauty, however, it is oftentimes, disheveled. Yes, a few close games were literally won by exhausting our opponents. Now, we're having to admit to what some have claimed: this approach (with our current personnel) does not always work against the better, deeper teams. However, if you think you're witnessing the finished Kim Caldwell Project, be prepared to be pleasantly surprised. Soon.

I still fear that we will lose against hair-on-fire Vanderbilt, tomorrow. IF we play tomorrow (I believe we will). And, we might lose key prospects, precisely due to the System we run. And yet, we literally have five very promising Ladies, three of them, All-Americans, heading our way! And the pluses-minuses of the portal are just around the corner. So, exciting times, regardless of how the SEC-NCAA Tournaments play out.

Cheers.
Click to expand...
I don't believe any will decommit, I am more worried about CKC getting offers from the WNBA than I am about players walking.
 
#61
#61
mudcat1973 said:
still does not show production points per shots if you do not add free atts in . in your goal is do solve points per shots on the court when the defense is guarding you. take free points and atts out then you can solve . points per shot when the defense is guarding the shoter.@ I GIVE YOU THE POINT OF TESS NOT IN THE TOP FIVE AS THIS SYSTEM IS BUILT FOR CREATING YOUR OWN SHOTS. LESS ON PASS AROUND TO GET A GOOD OPEN LOOK. @ heres the other stats on those three players before today@ tess ast 18 blk 3 stl 19 rb 51 to 6 @ body ast 38 blk 3 stl 36 rb41 to 18 @ latham ast 7 blk 6 stl 26 rb 106 to 17 @ those numbers where before todays game @ assist @ blocks@ steals@ rebounds@ turnovers @ is the stats provide dont want debate those . share them because i wrote them down. @ tess would do better where they share the basketball . play ground basketball as not tess strong point. as coach jumper said got to get mime is not tess strong point. @Coach Jumper sorry coach for using your words.
Click to expand...
rest of my notes from utsports before texas a&m stats @tess fgm 64 fga 173 fg %37 3 pt51 3 pta 145 3pt 352% ftm 4 fta 6 ft .667% points 183 @ boyd fgm 42 fga 84 fg .50% 3 pt 5 3pta 22 3pt .227% ftm 29 fta 37 ft .784% points 118 latham fgm 43 fga 93 fg .462% 3pt 9 3pta 29 .310% ftm 13 fta 33 . .393% points 108 @ correction tess fg% .369 % not 37 % utsports round it up .
 
#62
#62
chuckiepoo said:
Not even that. That incentive clause is huge money 💰
Click to expand...
like those high basketball goals at the fair . thats not any easy price non knoting over the milk bottles at the fair. it is also like darts at fair where you have to hit lot ballons to get a worth wild prize. same as wining national chmpship. got be out everyone for the big prize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: krichunaka
#64
#64
37620VOL said:
What if we just don't lose?
Click to expand...
even the winer of sec post season will leave south caroline by monaday if they are not the home team. if a non top four seed wins they would have won five /four games and need some rest before the ncaa. do not think a non south caroline team wants to get stay in south caroline to ncaa starts. if they do who ever in sec front office will never move the sec post games. besides some players might have classes next week. women get extra week rest / relaxation before march madness starts than the mens team. some gym time with the coaches will take place. just in case tenn wins pot at poker table with the five cards they draw each day till sunaday is a wining hand. AS KENNY ROGERS USED TO SAY YOU GOT TO KNOW WHEN AND WHEN TO HOLD THEM AND WHEN TO FOLD THEM WHEN SITING AT STACK TABLE THAT SOMEONE IN SOUTH CAROLINE AS SLIP DEALER SOME MONEY. YOU GOT KNOW WHEN WALK AWAY AND RUN WITH DEALER STACK THE DECK OF CARDS IN THOSE ____ GAMECOCKS FAVOR!! AND WITH THE DEALER FROM SOUTH CAROLINE PUTING ODDS IN THEIR FAVOR NON SOUTH CAROLINE WILL GET A TARGET ON HER BACK IF THEY SLIIP OUT OF SOUTH CAROLINE WITH THE HOUSES MONEY!!!!
 
Last edited:
#66
#66
37620VOL said:
Hey man, mudcat gonna mudcat, just enjoy the ride -- seems like a good dude
Click to expand...
Post this thread because a poster post Hollingshead - Darby's - Puckett
Posted in a different thread those three should have scored 15 points for their combine minutes 38 minutes in that game.
Thread was to show how many points a player score per minute in the regular season games.
As far as who gets minutes that's up to coach .
As the blame who wins or lose blame starts there so Coach should do what she/he thinks after all it's thre job to win that's on the line.
And for other combine commits I have seen posted by posters since Darby's been a vol.
I just partly read threads hope family members don't read posters postings commits like where a player should have gone.
Thread wasn't about more minutes was about post saying the starter's got 118 minutes and average 55 points that post lump Sara - Tessa Jillian and their scoring together and minutes in that game were Tennessee loss together.
This system not built for working the ball around and getting better shots.
It built for quick scoring and attacking the basket
And trying to pressure the team and get more shots than the other team

One thing for sure Kim will have mostly her style of player's next year sink or swim it will be with her style of player's.

They just be Cooper two years left
Boyd three years left
Ace one year left
12 spots open some teams have play season with that number of players.
In football it takes four year's for a coach to get their player's in especially before transfer portal. And see what a coach can do.
Kim goings to have a team of her style in year two.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top