DiderotsGhost
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 4,671
- Likes
- 23,794
- Spurrier had 3 years at Duke before arriving in Florida. Leach has been a head coach for 17 years. Not much of a comparison.
- Bryant won conference titles at both Kentucky and A&M before landing in Alabama. Leach has won exactly zero. Not a good comparison.
But do you seriously think Spurrier would've won a national title at Duke if given 10 years? I don't. Spurrier is one of the most brilliant coaches in CFB history, but he wasn't winning big at Duke. In fact, Spurrier got slaughtered by Tennessee in 1989, his final season at Duke.
Also, while Leach has technically had 17 years as a coach, that's misleading. He had 10 years at T-Tech and 7 at Wazzou. It's not like he got to carry forward the progress at Texas Tech to Wash State. He started over and Wash State was a major rebuilding job.
Wash State was 7-29 the 3 seasons before Leach got there. He's 28-11 the past 3 seasons. So he's basically a +7 win / year coach over the previous coach. There are very few coaches in college football history that can say that.
Leach wanted this job bad because he knew it might be his final chance to head a program he could win a national title with. And frankly, I hope no other SEC school (e.g. Auburn) hires him, because he'd be a nightmare to face.
