Michelle Obama: 'Hillary was the best qualified candidate in history'

#1

Darkman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2018
Messages
690
Likes
269
#1
Shows what arrogant elitist the democrats are. Shows the Obama's are out of touch with the rest of the country ...

Michelle Obama: Hillary was the best qualified candidate in history ? GOPUSA

At the Simmons College leadership conference in Boston on Thursday, former first lady Michelle Obama praised her husband’s presidency while taking a veiled swipe at the current occupant of the White House. She said that her husband’s administration was “like having the good parent at home.” In Michelle Obama’s warped view, her husband filled the national role of a “responsible parent, the one who told you to eat your carrots and go to bed on time.”

This analogy is ridiculous as a “good parent” would not practically double the national debt, socialize healthcare, unconstitutionally grant amnesty to illegal aliens and disregard the readiness level of our military forces. This “good parent” pulled troops from Iraq too soon, which led to the formation of ISIS, and totally bungled a military intrusion into Libya, which led to the terrorist attack at our compound in Benghazi and the death of four brave Americans.

After the disastrous reign of the “good parent,” Americans were obviously ready for another type of “parent” and had the good sense to elect Donald Trump as President. In her remarks at the conference, Obama laughably implied that Trump was the “other” type of parent that allowed Americans to “eat candy all day and stay up late and not follow the rules.” Her clear implication was that while it may feel good to choose this type of a leader, the country will pay a terrible price for splurging on these unhealthy Trump induced habits.

Of course, Obama’s biased analysis was the result of wishful thinking and pure fantasy. In reality, President Trump is the “responsible parent” leading the country toward sane fiscal, trade, immigration and military policies. This President is the one who is finally dealing with the longstanding problems plaguing America such as open borders, horrible trade deals, high corporate taxes and a declining military.

During the Obama years, these crises were ignored, so no action was taken, and the problems worsened. For example, President Trump inherited from Obama a nuclear armed North Korea, an ISIS terror threat and military readiness crisis. A truly “responsible” parent would not have left such a miserable set of problems for his successor.

In her comments, Michelle Obama did share some truly wonderful news. Thankfully, she expressed no appetite to follow in her husband’s footsteps and run for President. She said, “I don’t want to be president; I don’t think I should be president; I think I can do a lot of things, but that’s not one of them.” For millions of Americans, this reassurance was quite a relief, as one Obama presidency is one too many.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#3
#3
I place the Middle Eastern small ball policy, ramped up drone strikes, and Sryian humanitarian nightmare directly at her feet. She's got just as much blood on her hands as the W admin.

Both candidates in the general were disgusting human beings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#5
#5
That's not exactly a new development.

The availability of info on candidates this past go around was transcendent...and yet people still picked the turds in the primaries.

A civic competency test should be taken in order to qualify to vote in the primaries. One where the test taker has to demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the candidates and current events.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7
#7
A civic competency test should be taken in order to qualify to vote in the primaries. One where the test taker has to demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the candidates and current events.

That won't work and the DNC won't go for it.

I mean, how are you going to pick a good candidate based on the 34 registered Democrats voting in the primary?
 
#8
#8
The availability of info on candidates this past go around was transcendent...and yet people still picked the turds in the primaries.

A civic competency test should be taken in order to qualify to vote in the primaries. One where the test taker has to demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the candidates and current events.

Look man. Both candidates absolutely sucked. No disagreement. I didn’t vote for either of them I went libertarian. But the sheer continuous incessant volume of *****ing by the libtards about Hills losing a freaking rigged election has me squarely in Trumps corner now.

Don’t blame Trump on us. And if the left would drop the incessant crying and manufacturing obstruction for the legally elected admin you’d be amazed how quickly a lot of us would clam up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9
#9
That won't work and the DNC won't go for it.

I mean, how are you going to pick a good candidate based on the 34 registered Democrats voting in the primary?

The DNC already openly believes a large portion of their voting base can’t find their way to the DMV. They damn sure won’t believe they could pass a civics test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10
#10
I place the Middle Eastern small ball policy, ramped up drone strikes, and Sryian humanitarian nightmare directly at her feet. She's got just as much blood on her hands as the W admin.

Both candidates in the general were disgusting human beings.

That's interesting. Why aren't those BHO's instead of Michelle's?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#11
#11
3f6.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#12
#12
In her comments, Michelle Obama did share some truly wonderful news. Thankfully, she expressed no appetite to follow in her husband’s footsteps and run for President. She said, “I don’t want to be president; I don’t think I should be president; I think I can do a lot of things, but that’s not one of them.” For millions of Americans, this reassurance was quite a relief, as one Obama presidency is one too many.

Michelle Obama: Hillary was the best qualified candidate in history ? GOPUSA

This actually should read something like:

'Thankfully, by not running for President herself, she's expressed no appetite to follow in Hillary's footsteps.'
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
Look man. Both candidates absolutely sucked. No disagreement. I didn’t vote for either of them I went libertarian. But the sheer continuous incessant volume of *****ing by the libtards about Hills losing a freaking rigged election has me squarely in Trumps corner now.

Don’t blame Trump on us. And if the left would drop the incessant crying and manufacturing obstruction for the legally elected admin you’d be amazed how quickly a lot of us would clam up.


Yeah, well Russia got involved, attacking the sovereignty of our electoral process. That is established fact and something we should be pissed off about.

And yet Trump & the people in his camp can't say one turse thing about the Kremlin. You (and many other Trumpers) should be bigger than this reactionary/defensive posturing. You're adults

I was prepared to vote conservative until Trump got the nod.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#17
#17
That won't work and the DNC won't go for it.

I mean, how are you going to pick a good candidate based on the 34 registered Democrats voting in the primary?

They'd try to paint it as racist. GOP would at this point go the populist route & claim it was an assault on the Joe the Plumbers of the world.

Both parties have "go-to" groups they can manipulate.
 
Last edited:
#20
#20
Yeah, well Russia got involved, attacking the sovereignty of our electoral process. That is established fact and something we should be pissed off about.

And yet Trump & the people in his camp can't say one turse thing about the Kremlin. You (and many other Trumpers) should be bigger than this reactionary/defensive posturing. You're adults

I was prepared to vote conservative until Trump got the nod.

Dude there isn’t a piece of evidence associating Trump with Russian meddling.

I think he indeed made some poor decisions when getting his feet under him at the start of his admin.

And look at the drive by time Manafort was associated with the campaign. I would guess once they started talking to him and took another look they ran like hell from him.

Who cares what Trump is saying about Russia? Barry was focused for 8 years on tough talk and no action. Trump has already taken more action against Russia than Barry did in 8 years! And he’s even arming the Ukrainians! That’s freaking great!

Edit: also it’s our responsibility to protect our elections from foreign power influence. If Russia or others weren’t trying to interfere I’d wonder wtf good their intelligence corps were good for.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#21
#21
Qualified doesn't mean good. As far as political resume, it's hard to argue she wasn't extremely qualified. However, she's an awful person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#22
#22
Dude there isn’t a piece of evidence associating Trump with Russian meddling.

I think he indeed made some poor decisions when getting his feet under him at the start of his admin.

And look at the drive by time Manafort was associated with the campaign. I would guess once they started talking to him and took another look they ran like hell from him.

Who cares what Trump is saying about Russia? Barry was focused for 8 years on tough talk and no action. Trump has already taken more action against Russia than Barry did in 8 years! And he’s even arming the Ukrainians! That’s freaking great!

Edit: also it’s our responsibility to protect our elections from foreign power influence. If Russia or others weren’t trying to interfere I’d wonder wtf good their intelligence corps were good for.


I never stated there was a direct connection between Trump and the Kremlin (although the Stone, Flynn, and Manafort connections look shady at best).

Mattis, Tillerson, and Congress shoved the Ukraine deal in Trump's face at a time when he knew he had to sign off. Those 60 "diplomats" we kicked out? We're letting Russia send 60 new "diplomats" over. We're inviting Putin over and talking about re-establishing a friendship while NATO and our oldest ally (UK) are trying to draw a line. Meanwhile Russia is continuing to accuse us and the UK of the murders on British soil.

The only reason you are dismissive of Russia's behavior on the world stage over the past few years is due to some real cognitive dissonance. You're afraid acknowledging it would affect the legitimacy of an outcome you liked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#23
#23
I never stated there was a direct connection between Trump and the Kremlin (although the Stone, Flynn, and Manafort connections look shady at best).

Mattis, Tillerson, and Congress shoved the Ukraine deal in Trump's face at a time when he knew he had to sign off. Those 60 "diplomats" we kicked out? We're letting Russia send 60 new "diplomats" over. We're inviting Putin over and talking about re-establishing a friendship while NATO and our oldest ally (UK) are trying to draw a line. Meanwhile Russia is continuing to accuse us and the UK of the murders on British soil.

The only reason you are dismissive of Russia's behavior on the world stage over the past few years is due to some real cognitive dissonance. You're afraid acknowledging it would affect the legitimacy of an outcome you liked.

You would prefer to go back to the Cold War way of doing things when they didn't talk?
 
#24
#24
I never stated there was a direct connection between Trump and the Kremlin (although the Stone, Flynn, and Manafort connections look shady at best).

Mattis, Tillerson, and Congress shoved the Ukraine deal in Trump's face at a time when he knew he had to sign off. Those 60 "diplomats" we kicked out? We're letting Russia send 60 new "diplomats" over. We're inviting Putin over and talking about re-establishing a friendship while NATO and our oldest ally (UK) are trying to draw a line. Meanwhile Russia is continuing to accuse us and the UK of the murders on British soil.

The only reason you are dismissive of Russia's behavior on the world stage over the past few years is due to some real cognitive dissonance. You're afraid acknowledging it would affect the legitimacy of an outcome you liked.

I’m not dismissive of Russia’s behavior. That is your interpretation not my stance. Russia is a criminal state as far as I’m concerned. They invaded and still occupy Crimea and took it by force from the Ukraine. They should be held accountable. Show me one single action Barry took against Russia on that other than harsh language. Trump is putting arms into the hands of the Ukranians. Effective anti armor weapons not some M-16s and Berettas.

And, again, it’s our responsibility to protect OUR elections. If foreign nationals or even US citizens *cough-DNC rigging-cough* are found to have broken laws on our books then prosecute them!

But, again, there is no information typing Trump to any Russian interefeence!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#25
#25
You would prefer to go back to the Cold War way of doing things when they didn't talk?

We definitely need to refuse this meeting - and Trump will probably get pressured by his cabinet(what's left of it) and congress into doing so.

Putin is trying to use it as an opportunity to his people that Russia isn't isolated.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top