'Boro-vol
The one, the original. Accept no Substitutes.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2006
- Messages
- 11,364
- Likes
- 22,517
We all have. I specifically meant from this team and coaching staff. The trackrecord deserves consideration.
Why does it deserve consideration? What does Dooley's track record have to do with the Georgia game this week? Nothing. He wins and opinions will change again. He loses and people will just say "That's what Dooley does." But either way his track record won't effect the play calling on Saturday. It won't effect Tyler Bray's decision making. It won't effect our secondary's ability to cover. It won't effect our ability to run the ball. It's just a record. That is the past. People can improve in this world. Dooley can improve as a head coach. Tomorrow he can be better than he was yesterday.
Do I know for sure that he is going to better? I do not. But for now, he is our head coach.... so I sure as hell hope he does.
'Asked if Tennessee's offense is the best the Bulldogs have faced this season, Richt said, "I think so, definitely throwing the ball.
"They are throwing it and catching it extremely well. Their run game is starting to come around, too, and I know that has been important to them to do that. They want balance in their attack and it's hard to have balance when you have the types of receivers they've got."'
Here is the link to the article
Georgia Article
Cop out answer.
So was yours. To say that a coaches historical track record is inconsequential is absurd.
Vegas doesn't think so.....neither will AD's when considering a coach for employment. It is what a coach and a team are just by, otherwise we'd have 6-6 teams playing for National Championships based upon potential.
I hate UGA more than any other team in America.
UF is a close 2nd.
I don't even hate Bama as bad as those two, Saban being the man and all.
Can't stand Va Tech or K-St either.