Mark Jones vs. Charles Woodson

#1

utvol0427

Bring back post junkies!!
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
11,718
Likes
6
#1
The other thread talking about Ainge winning the heisman got me thinking about Peyton losing to Woodson. I have heard before that Mark Jones numbers from 2003 were very comparable to that of Woodson's in 1997, so I decided to research the stats for the two players.


Charles Woodson:

5 Rush 41 Yards 8.2 Avg. 0 TD
12 Rec. 238 Yards 19.8 Avg. 2 TD
36 PR 302 Yards 8.4 Avg. 1 TD
27 Tack 1 Sack 8 INT


Mark Jones:

7 Rush 65 Yards 9.2 Avg. 0 TD
35 Rec. 556 Yards 15.9 Avg. 5 TD
20 PR 303 Yards 15.1 Avg. 1 TD
20 Tack 0 Sack 2 INT


I thought these were interesting and figured I would share them with you all. Discuss amongst yourselves.
 
#9
#9
Or maybe the six less picks he had?
What about the 300+ yards receiving that Mark Jones had. I in no way think that Mark Jones should have won the Heisman, or even been considered for it, I just think the numbers show that Woodson shouldn't have won it either.
 
#11
#11
What about the 300+ yards receiving that Mark Jones had. I in no way think that Mark Jones should have won the Heisman, or even been considered for it, I just think the numbers show that Woodson shouldn't have won it either.

As was said earlier in this thread or the Ainge thread the Heisman has become a complete "Hype Machine," nothing more and nothing less...
 
#13
#13
As was said earlier in this thread or the Ainge thread the Heisman has become a complete "Hype Machine," nothing more and nothing less...
I agree, I just think the numbers were interesting and wanted to throw them out there.
 
#16
#16
Completely offset by the huge difference in catches and yards plus MJ has 2x the TD's.

The difference was a 1-handed int that Woodson made vs. OSU(?).

I think the difference was that Woodson's punt return for a touchdown came at a pivotal moment in a critical game against rival Ohio St. It's not fair, but all you really need to win the Heisman is to play on a national championship caliber team, and a signature moment in a big game.
 
#17
#17
I think the difference was that Woodson's punt return for a touchdown came at a pivotal moment in a critical game against rival Ohio St. It's not fair, but all you really need to win the Heisman is to play on a national championship caliber team, and a signature moment in a big game.

Yeah, and strike the Heisman pose in the endzone
 
#19
#19
I think the difference was that Woodson's punt return for a touchdown came at a pivotal moment in a critical game against rival Ohio St. It's not fair, but all you really need to win the Heisman is to play on a national championship caliber team, and a signature moment in a big game.

Johnny Majors lost the Heisman Trophy to Paul Hornung, who starred for Notre Dame. That year Notre Dame had a losing record. To date, this is the only time the Heisman Trophy has been awarded to a player on a losing team.

Let the damn yankees have their boring award.
 
#21
#21
Johnny Majors lost the Heisman Trophy to Paul Hornung, who starred for Notre Dame. That year Notre Dame had a losing record. To date, this is the only time the Heisman Trophy has been awarded to a player on a losing team.

Let the damn yankees have their boring award.
It has always baffled me that the one and only time a player from a losing team one the Heisman, he beat out someone from UT.:banghead2:
 
#23
#23
I think the difference was that Woodson's punt return for a touchdown came at a pivotal moment in a critical game against rival Ohio St. It's not fair, but all you really need to win the Heisman is to play on a national championship caliber team, and a signature moment in a big game.

I think you nailed it.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top