Mannings mooning incident on ESPN.

#51
#51
Whether that's a fact, or not, it doesn't mean that's what happened in Peyton's situation. Peyton Manning shouldn't have to go through the rest of his life carrying the label of "sex offender" if he is not guilty. As I understand it, the so-called "victim" didn't come forward until long after this incident supposedly occurred. She was looking for money and it's not the only time she's done so. That, alone, is enough to make me suspicious of her version of what happened.

So no sex offender label for Manning but a gold-digger label for her beccause we don't know what happened..?

Might proofread for logical continuity before submitting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#52
#52
I don't think this was just a "mooning incident". Manning put his penis on her face.

There's debate about that. She claimed that about 4 years after the fact when she sued Peyton for defamation....but that's not what she originally alleged when she first sued the University.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#53
#53
This is an attempt to keep Manning off the airways as a commentator. In private conversations, he's probably leaning toward Fox and E$PN is slinging mud to discredit him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#54
#54
It sounds like PM was in the wrong, though it certainly wouldn't be the first time a young man acted inappropriately.

Here's my Q: if it was instead a walk-on QB at UT whose time at UT was minimal, would this issue be in the paper today?

If the answer is NO, then this is an orchestrated attack to obtain money and not a suit aimed at the betterment of work conditions at UT or any school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#56
#56
This was a pretty bad incident that turned out to be Peyton vs. Trainer. She has a lot of testimony backing her version evidently. It would have gone away of Peyton hadn't written about her in his book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#57
#57
I guess I don't know what teabagging is... I just googled it based on the responses. That sounds disgusting and why didn't she bite down. I was thinking more placed on victims shoulder or something like that.

Sorry, I've never been in a frat and never knew what that was.

At least now, you get it. A bunch of these hero worshippers never will.
 
#58
#58
I guess I don't know what teabagging is... I just googled it based on the responses. That sounds disgusting and why didn't she bite down. I was thinking more placed on victims shoulder or something like that.

Sorry, I've never been in a frat and never knew what that was.

The Bama fan teabagging the LSU fan at that krystal after 2011 national championship was a sex crime and handled immediately. This junk that this lady is spewing was unlikely to be proven so easy to throw out that alleged behavior.
 
#59
#59
So no sex offender label for Manning but a gold-digger label for her beccause we don't know what happened..?

Might proofread for logical continuity before submitting.

There's this quaint little legal principle called presumption of innocence. That's how it's supposed to work, anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#60
#60
The way I look at it, there can't be much substance to the current allegations if they have to try so hard to win their case in the media. They obviously aren't very confident of their chances in an actual courtroom.

Beware. Someone will probably pull out something of Neyland, Majors or whoever to get themselves more in their 401k.
 
#61
#61
I played football, basketball and baseball in high school (a long time ago). If I got money for every time I have been mooned I might be a rich man today. Dragging up these old stories has got to stop. Our justice system is so screwed up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#62
#62
Jesus. Manning isn't being sued. He's listed in the papers as an evidentiary citation of the school being at fault.

Read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#64
#64
At least now, you get it. A bunch of these hero worshippers never will.

This is why I was confused.

"The UT lawsuit filed last week calls out an alleged 1996 incident in which Manning, a UT football player, was accused of placing his naked genitals on the face of the female trainer while she was examining him"

I guess I assumed this was teabagging. No actual contact just a nasty sight.
 
#66
#66
I suspect it was more than just a mooning. I don't know if I would say a lot more. The truth is none of us knows exactly what happened.

You state no one knows exactly what happened immediately after speculating it was more than just mooning. So which road you taking, high or low?
 
#68
#68
Where there is smoke, it follows that there must be lawyers.

There must have been damages (real or imagined) or there would not have been a $300,000 settlement (real).

Part of that settlement was a non disclosure clause. That means you don't talk about it even if you have spent the money.

Why do we have to listen to these forbidden words twenty years later?

Most of us probably did shat much worse than that when we were twenty years old and nobody talks about or even thinks about it twenty years later.

Some little people like to see their names in print and will do almost anything to accomplish that goal.

And besides, there might be a dollar in it.

Give it a rest. Give us all a break and let's move on!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#70
#70
This is why I was confused.

"The UT lawsuit filed last week calls out an alleged 1996 incident in which Manning, a UT football player, was accused of placing his naked genitals on the face of the female trainer while she was examining him"

I guess I assumed this was teabagging. No actual contact just a nasty sight.

What I understood from Mike and Mike this morning was on her head. Pretty sure it wasn't in her mouth, on her lips, etc. as an intentional sexual act. I understood more of a prank. Although, the guy they tried to get to back up the story of mooning said no and supposedly lost his eligibility over it.
 
#72
#72
Jesus. Manning isn't being sued. He's listed in the papers as an evidentiary citation of the school being at fault.

Read.

No, but his celebrity is being used to garner negative attention. The more the plaintiff's lawyers can keep this in the media, the better their chances of getting paid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#73
#73
I think it was a lot more than that

It is important to point out that Peyton Manning denied that there was ever any physical contact involved in the 1996 training room incident and that Jamie Whited only stated that there had been physical contact during the defamation suit in 2003 that she filed because he had referenced the incident in his book and said that she had a "vulgar mouth". The settlements are not an admission of guilt or an agreement of any facts. You were also wrong when you said that this incident had been "swept under the rug". This story has been covered extensively since 1997 and run into the ground. I have read far more about this than I ever did Ben Roethlisberger's rape allegation. It has been hashed and rehashed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#74
#74
What I understood from Mike and Mike this morning was on her head. Pretty sure it wasn't in her mouth, on her lips, etc. as an intentional sexual act. I understood more of a prank. Although, the guy they tried to get to back up the story of mooning said no and supposedly lost his eligibility over it.

That's what I alway thought. I would think that, for a doctor, albeit a female doctor, this sort of thing can happen in a college boys locker room. It's not like he laid them on the shoulder of Gert sitting in the pew in front of him at church.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Advertisement



Back
Top