MAC Offense?

#1

lonelawyer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
1,112
Likes
1,023
#1
We get a lot of posts complaining about Butch's "MAC offense" not working in the SEC. It obviously doesn't unless you have a rocket scientist at quarterback who can improvise. But what exactly is Butch's offense? It isn't a true read option because the QB is apparently given some strict limits. It is often called a West Coast spread, but if that is true, then we haven't seen it run correctly.

One thing that is certain, it is not designed for SEC offensive linemen. Big aggressive monsters are unable to thrive in this system. It is designed for smaller linemen who move well horizontally and simply redirect the defense. In fact, an offensive linemen who is aggressive in this system actually ends up leaving gaps for stunting D linemen and blitzing linebackers.

I would like some posters who truly understand football to tell us what Butch's system is really all about.

And don't say "crap". I think we know that. But there has to be a scheme to it or Brian Kelly wouldn't be using a variation of it at ND.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4
#4
His offense, ideally, is a product of resilient individuals who exhibit good eye discipline and harness the positive fallout from countless leadership reps so they can execute fundamental football in order to score touchdowns, which as we all know is a key part in going 1-0 in a giving week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#5
#5
Brian Kelly's is different, there's an article from a while back that explains the differences pretty well. I'll see if I can find it again, I remember one part of it saying Kelly's O relied on the deep pass while Butch's used a bunch of curl routes.

Edit: Found it in a Volnation thread from 2012.lol

A good overview of the offensive scheme favored by Butch Jones

The Difference Between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly: Part 1 - Down The Drive

The Difference Between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly: Part 2 - Down The Drive

The Difference Between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly: Part 3 - Down The Drive
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#6
#6
Brian Kelly's is different, there's an article from a while back that explains the differences pretty well. I'll see if I can find it again, I remember one part of it saying Kelly's O relied on the deep pass while Butch's used a bunch of curl routes.

Another thing I've noticed is that every play seems to be slow developing. Every play. And when you play against SEC D ends and linebackers, they are simply too quick to be redirected out of a play, particularly one that doesn't happen fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#7
#7
Brian Kelly's is different, there's an article from a while back that explains the differences pretty well. I'll see if I can find it again, I remember one part of it saying Kelly's O relied on the deep pass while Butch's used a bunch of curl routes.

Edit: Found it in a Volnation thread from 2012.lol

A good overview of the offensive scheme favored by Butch Jones

The Difference Between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly: Part 1 - Down The Drive

The Difference Between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly: Part 2 - Down The Drive

The Difference Between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly: Part 3 - Down The Drive

Wow! Why in the name of all that is good and beautiful did we ever hire Butch?:banghead2: If UC fans knew his scheme was crap, what idiot thought that it would work differently here? I'm glad I'm not a conspiracy believer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9
#9
I'll say it again: when you have bean counters/fund raisers who don't know shat about football, what we have now is what you end up with...no if, ands, or buts...:):)

GO VOLS!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10
#10
Wow! Why in the name of all that is good and beautiful did we ever hire Butch?:banghead2: If UC fans knew his scheme was crap, what idiot thought that it would work differently here? I'm glad I'm not a conspiracy believer.

I dunno, I guess it was the safe hire at the time. It's definitely time to move on though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#11
#11
What I don't get is why we seem married to an 11 personnel grouping. At some point doesn't it have to dawn on you that 3 and 4 wide sets don't even slightly scare a defense when they know they can rush 4 and get to the QB AND they can stop the run with a 6 man box if they need to?. Don't you have to show double TE or 2 RBs to help the o-line and QB out?

The 3/4 wide spread has to stretch the defense vertically with the pass or horizontally with speed. We don't do either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#12
#12
I don't think Butch even knows what his offense is supposed to be.

I think that’s accurate. How many times did he flip out when the media tried to get clarification on his offensive scheme? And he would give some generic answer that never really explained how what he claims he’s running doesn’t match up with what’s on the field.
 
#13
#13
His offense, ideally, is a product of resilient individuals who exhibit good eye discipline and harness the positive fallout from countless leadership reps so they can execute fundamental football in order to score touchdowns, which as we all know is a key part in going 1-0 in a giving week.
you had me until giving...
 
#14
#14
What I don't get is why we seem married to an 11 personnel grouping. At some point doesn't it have to dawn on you that 3 and 4 wide sets don't even slightly scare a defense when they know they can rush 4 and get to the QB AND they can stop the run with a 6 man box if they need to?. Don't you have to show double TE or 2 RBs to help the o-line and QB out?

The 3/4 wide spread has to stretch the defense vertically with the pass or horizontally with speed. We don't do either.
The same reason most teams college (even the SEC) and NFL are.. 11 (1 TE 1 RB), which covers shotgun, singleback and pistol is by far more common especially in the NFL than 21 which I think you are referring to (1 TE 2 RB) which covers I-form and pro-form. Even bamas base offensive depth chart is 11 2017 Alabama Crimson Tide Football Depth Chart | Ourlads.com
 
Last edited:
#15
#15
Another thing I've noticed is that every play seems to be slow developing. Every play. And when you play against SEC D ends and linebackers, they are simply too quick to be redirected out of a play, particularly one that doesn't happen fast.

Lonelawyer, you hit the nail squarely on the head. Under the "leadership" of both of our QBs thus far, our offense has moved like frozen molasses, sooooo slow-motion slowly... that is, when the center isn't butt-cheeking the ball instead of getting it cleanly to the QB. Our offense is a total wreck. However, I believe the defense would be quite serviceable IF they were not on the field 3/4 OR MORE of the game due to the ineptitude of the offense and the lousy offensive play-calling. GBO...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#16
#16
We get a lot of posts complaining about Butch's "MAC offense" not working in the SEC. It obviously doesn't unless you have a rocket scientist at quarterback who can improvise. But what exactly is Butch's offense? It isn't a true read option because the QB is apparently given some strict limits. It is often called a West Coast spread, but if that is true, then we haven't seen it run correctly.

No. It is a version of the west coast spread. The fundamental elements of a WC O are usually a zone blocking run game then lots of short passes meant to keep D's spread out. The "zone read" is NOT the O... it is incidental to the O being in a spread formation.

The WC O works across football. The spread works. Other versions of the WC spread work.

Jones has his own "take" on it.

I think there are two different ideas about why Jones' O has failed so badly. I've leaned toward the nuances of his particular version but it could be nothing more than he does not know how to coach players up. That would be a little surprising since he seemed to in the past but maybe that was just the residual from following B Kelly.

One thing that is certain, it is not designed for SEC offensive linemen. Big aggressive monsters are unable to thrive in this system.
This again could go two ways. Did he succeed because Kelly left him OL's that were already trained or did his scheme just work because it was mostly run against lesser athletes? I lean toward the latter but it could be either or both.

One thing is certain. It asks UT's OL's to do things that for 4 years they have been unable or unprepared to do. The only good OL Jones has had at UT was the one left to him... it was strongly rumored at the time that they refused to learn Jones' "techniques".

It is designed for smaller linemen who move well horizontally and simply redirect the defense. In fact, an offensive linemen who is aggressive in this system actually ends up leaving gaps for stunting D linemen and blitzing linebackers.
Don't know if that's the design but you've nailed the effect.

I would like some posters who truly understand football to tell us what Butch's system is really all about.
I won't claim to be any more knowledgeable than I am. You've already hit part of it with the OL's.

It only gets more complex for the receivers and QB's.

For the RB's, it is "different" somewhat but probably not more difficult. The way the OL is supposed to block should open holes at specific times and places for the RB. They have to play with a certain "technique" to be able to take advantage.

Jones' receiver route trees for the most part require them to get off coverage, read the D according to their route tree, run a perfect route in perfect timing,... then make a play on the ball. If those route trees don't work then there's not down field passing game. If they don't have that then D's play up on the LOS and stop the run game and short passes. Voila... you have the UGA and Bama game.

This is where Dobbs' running became the X factor. D's could stop the deep and intermediate passing game but then Dobbs would break contain and run for more yards than a pass would have gained. THIS is what allowed him to bail Jones' system out.

As for the QB's, they have to make good pre-snap reads (unless they can run like Dobbs). The O then gives them sight windows. None of this is uncommon. Within those sight windows you will have a convergence of routes and key defenders to read. The throw is supposed to be based on where the defenders are in the half second or so window when the ball is supposed to be delivered. Almost everything Jones' passing O does has some sort of timing element to it. Miss that throw window... and you better have Dobbs' hands on the ball.

What makes that much more difficult is that they have to make all of those post and pre-snap reads... then be in sync with receivers who may or may not be able to read the play correctly and be where they need to be for the play to succeed.

Early in the year, Dormady was throwing some passes to where they were supposed to go... but the receivers missed their assignments. It was kind of a theme for the coaches for a few weeks. Then Dormady started trying to compensate for the receivers... and things went rapidly down hill.

This is why I say JG isn't ready. He hasn't played great because they haven't taken any chances or given him a big playbook. That isn't his fault at all. He shouldn't need to know a scheme so nuanced and "fragile" as a RS Fr in college.

And don't say "crap". I think we know that. But there has to be a scheme to it or Brian Kelly wouldn't be using a variation of it at ND.
When Jones first arrived there was a repost here of an article by a pretty sharp Cincy fan discussing the differences between Jones' O and Kelly's. Both run a spread WC O. I'm not completely sure if Kelly uses different techniques with the OL... but their route trees aren't even built on the same foundations. The best I understand, Kelly's routes are designed to "scheme" players open whereas Jones' are designed to require execution to get them open.


IMHO, Jones tries to be "too NFL". I'm not saying he'd be good in the pros but much of what he asks these guys to do requires A LOT more time to perfect than college programs are allowed to practice. I think that's why emphasizes truly stupid stuff like "mental reps". Yes you want guys watching to learn... but there is a massive chasm between watching and doing when it comes to football practice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#19
#19
PS- Compare Jones' complexity to Spurrier's simplicity. Spurrier schemed receivers open on every play. There were some reads but not the kind that Jones' O demands. He simplified things for everyone on the O but it wasn't simple at all for the opposing D.

Jones' O has the O players trying to execute a bunch of "fine details" while D's just have to "attack" to disrupt that execution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#20
#20
PS- Compare Jones' complexity to Spurrier's simplicity. Spurrier schemed receivers open on every play. There were some reads but not the kind that Jones' O demands. He simplified things for everyone on the O but it wasn't simple at all for the opposing D.

Jones' O has the O players trying to execute a bunch of "fine details" while D's just have to "attack" to disrupt that execution.

Thank you. I was just making that same comparison to some colleagues.
 
#21
#21
it's alternating between hilarious and sickening that going back 5 plus years his teams had trouble with pass defense and short yardage.

I think I'm going to stop worrying about saying that Dooley was a smarter game day coach than Jones. He may have been an unlikeable jerk. He definitely didn't put time and effort into recruiting. But I truly miss an offense that plays like that. Aggressive OL play. Routes designed to stretch secondaries open. A marginally talented RB getting to the 2ns or 3rd level before being touched.... I'd take it.
 
#22
#22
I think I'm going to stop worrying about saying that Dooley was a smarter game day coach than Jones. He may have been an unlikeable jerk. He definitely didn't put time and effort into recruiting. But I truly miss an offense that plays like that. Aggressive OL play. Routes designed to stretch secondaries open. A marginally talented RB getting to the 2ns or 3rd level before being touched.... I'd take it.

Plus, Dooley was hilarious, sometimes even on purpose.

Dooleyisms: Memorable sayings from former UT head coach Derek Dooley - YouTube
 
#23
#23
I actually like Butch's O conceptually. It's very similar to the Urban Meyer power spread concept. Where I think Butch falters is recruiting and development. On the recruiting side, I think he was more of a star chaser at UT rather than being able to identify talent that fits his system and dam the star rankings. I think Jalen Hurd is a perfect example. Coming out of high school this kid just screamed All-American safety or LB but Jones was determined to use a RB that wasn't very nimble in an O system that need a Kamara or Sony Michel type of back over a bruiser.

UGA fans always complained about Mark Richts OL recruiting because he recruited smaller guys that moved well laterally over road graders. Even though Richt didn't get the D side of the ball right after Van Gorder left, he almost always had a decent O because he knew what his system required.

As far as player development, I never really saw an experienced player that was markedly better as a SR than he was as a Soph outside of normal maturity. Imo, Jones just never recruited kids that fit his system and developed them accordingly. When he did stumble on a great fit for his system like Kelly and Kamara, he almost always under utilized them.
 
#24
#24
The same reason most teams college (even the SEC) and NFL are.. 11 (1 TE 1 RB), which covers shotgun, singleback and pistol is by far more common especially in the NFL than 21 which I think you are referring to (1 TE 2 RB) which covers I-form and pro-form. Even bamas base offensive depth chart is 11 2017 Alabama Crimson Tide Football Depth Chart | Ourlads.com
I know it's popular. But how long do you have to watch WRs disappear, pass protection fall apart, QBs struggle etc before you realize your offense is stuck in a bad place? Effectively, if you're spread out and the WRs pose no threat, you're playing 9 on 11 football. It's a Power Spread with no power and no ability to spread the defense; especially if you're so married to it that you pay it exclusively in the red zone.

It's why I've always liked the FSU/Mark Richt spread better where they spread things out, but still get under center and use 2 RBs 30-40% of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#25
#25
I have to give Jones credit for believing in his way and sticking to it. Too many coaches fail because they DON'T do that. But... his way failed. It doesn't work and he's been too rigid and stubborn to change.

Hurd makes a great example. He was great athlete... and RB. But the spread didn't play to what he really did best. They needed to adjust the O to run more under center with aggressive man on man blocking.

This year makes another great example. The QB who apparently won the 8 month competition for the starting job was/is a pro-style QB. Give him some plays under center with PA off of them coupled with simple routes and reads... and maybe the whole thing goes different. Larry Scott might have saved Jones if Jones would have allowed it. Scott wanted to run under center all along.

But Jones believes in his O and will NOT budge. His O should look very different now from when he arrived. He's in trouble because it doesn't.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top