sami
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
- Messages
- 3,769
- Likes
- 10,902
193 vs 172 isn’t that big of a difference. We both played three top 40 KenPom opponents. Our buy games are a little worse than theirs, overall. Also doesn’t help us that Syracuse and Miami are having terrible seasons.No doubt there. I still don’t get the OOC ranking but it must just be because we have a lot more really lowly ranked teams than they do.
That’s a by-product of 16 team leagues - there’s no way to avoid it.Interesting that we could see 2 conference foes facing off against each other the first weekend of the NCAA Tournament.
Miami shocks me. When we played them they hung tough for a while. They didn’t look like a team that would be nearly as bad as they are.193 vs 172 isn’t that big of a difference. We both played three top 40 KenPom opponents. Our buy games are a little worse than theirs, overall. Also doesn’t help us that Syracuse and Miami are having terrible seasons.
Agree. We may be able to get stood but can we score down the stretch when the game is on the line. The answer was no vs. both games against KY, and on the rd @ Vandy and Auburn. The good news is we had a chance to tie or win three if those four games.Our offense scares me way more than our defense inspires confidence honestly.
Are you saying the SEC being the best ever is now a COLD take?There are so many cards left to be dealt. We need to play well down the stretch, get better, and hope for a seed that gives us favorable matchups. We’re pretty far away from enough data to have any idea where we’ll sit. UF has Condon hurt, Auburn and Bama knock each other around, and there are non- SEC teams looking in from the outside. A&M away is daunting. Alabama at home is a massive opportunity. If we knock off number one in the country and get to the tournament with two or fewer losses, we can land a great two or possibly a one depending on the circumstances. Two things are true: This year’s SEC is being discussed as the best conference in NCAA history. That’s been repeated so often it’s a talking point. Secondly, Lunardi and others have said that they WILL have to use tournament data this year (at least from the SEC) because the top seed separation will be razor thin. None of it matters now. We just need to finish strong and keep improving.
To be fair, we’re 0-3 in their gyms. We won’t be playing in their gyms though. I wouldn’t want to see UK in the tourney but I believe someone will bounce them before we would see them anyway.And they are 1-4 in those games which means any high rated offense we run into in March is likely sending us home.
It’s just hard when we don’t have a true number one scorer. Forget 2 or 3 we’re having trouble finding a consistent 1. Lanier and Igor are goint to need to be more consistent come tournament time. They can do it. Will they? Not sureAgree. We may be able to get stood but Dan we score down the stretch when the game is on the line. The answer was no vs. both games against KY, and on the rd @ Vandy and Auburn. The good news is we had a chance to tie or win three if those four games.