Lunardi Bracket Update - 2/13

#27
#27
No doubt there. I still don’t get the OOC ranking but it must just be because we have a lot more really lowly ranked teams than they do.
193 vs 172 isn’t that big of a difference. We both played three top 40 KenPom opponents. Our buy games are a little worse than theirs, overall. Also doesn’t help us that Syracuse and Miami are having terrible seasons.
 
#28
#28
Interesting that we could see 2 conference foes facing off against each other the first weekend of the NCAA Tournament.
That’s a by-product of 16 team leagues - there’s no way to avoid it.

I just turned on the UCLA-Indiana game and wondered why they were playing a non-conference game so late in the season, Then I realized this is now a B1G game. Still getting used to it.
 
#31
#31
193 vs 172 isn’t that big of a difference. We both played three top 40 KenPom opponents. Our buy games are a little worse than theirs, overall. Also doesn’t help us that Syracuse and Miami are having terrible seasons.
Miami shocks me. When we played them they hung tough for a while. They didn’t look like a team that would be nearly as bad as they are.
 
#33
#33
Our offense scares me way more than our defense inspires confidence honestly.
Agree. We may be able to get stood but can we score down the stretch when the game is on the line. The answer was no vs. both games against KY, and on the rd @ Vandy and Auburn. The good news is we had a chance to tie or win three if those four games.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Orangecrush#27
#34
#34
Lunardi may not be the most accurate overall but the committee or sources close to it 100% feed him some of the top seed order. He kept us a 2 several times when we felt we were a 1 the past few years and it didn’t make sense other than the fact he was fed that.
 
#38
#38
And they are 1-4 in those games which means any high rated offense we run into in March is likely sending us home.
You missed the qualifier:

(Just gotta make a few more shots.)

Yep. That 30 something offense ain’t gonna cut it.
 
#39
#39
There are so many cards left to be dealt. We need to play well down the stretch, get better, and hope for a seed that gives us favorable matchups. We’re pretty far away from enough data to have any idea where we’ll sit. UF has Condon hurt, Auburn and Bama knock each other around, and there are non- SEC teams looking in from the outside. A&M away is daunting. Alabama at home is a massive opportunity. If we knock off number one in the country and get to the tournament with two or fewer losses, we can land a great two or possibly a one depending on the circumstances. Two things are true: This year’s SEC is being discussed as the best conference in NCAA history. That’s been repeated so often it’s a talking point. Secondly, Lunardi and others have said that they WILL have to use tournament data this year (at least from the SEC) because the top seed separation will be razor thin. None of it matters now. We just need to finish strong and keep improving.
Are you saying the SEC being the best ever is now a COLD take?
 
#40
#40
And they are 1-4 in those games which means any high rated offense we run into in March is likely sending us home.
To be fair, we’re 0-3 in their gyms. We won’t be playing in their gyms though. I wouldn’t want to see UK in the tourney but I believe someone will bounce them before we would see them anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#43
#43
Just win out and we are a one seed.
Lose one to either TAMU or Bama and we are still probably a 1 or a high 2 seed.
 
#44
#44
Agree. We may be able to get stood but Dan we score down the stretch when the game is on the line. The answer was no vs. both games against KY, and on the rd @ Vandy and Auburn. The good news is we had a chance to tie or win three if those four games.
It’s just hard when we don’t have a true number one scorer. Forget 2 or 3 we’re having trouble finding a consistent 1. Lanier and Igor are goint to need to be more consistent come tournament time. They can do it. Will they? Not sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: vol94

VN Store



Back
Top