Looks like

#3
#3
wouldn't worry about it too much. Its women's basketball.

Obviously you care enough to post about it :crazy:

Anyway, kinda thought LSU would be a better match-up but didn't happen. Soon we'll know if UT can bring home #7.
 
#4
#4
Just saw the final score of the LSU-Rutgers game. All I can say is "Women's Basketball Fever: Catch it, then die of boredom."
 
#8
#8
Women's basketball is terribly boring. Each team combines for at least 50 turnovers and hardly anyone can score inside, during the LSU-Rutgers game there was 3 positions in a row where LSU missed easy layups and point blank shots.
 
#10
#10
If you guys don't like it, don't post about it. It's that simple. This thread was about LSU losing, not another irreverent thread with the usual characters degrading its existence.
 
#13
#13
and another slurp from stunna

Here's a thought, if you don't care about it then don't comment.
Anything that wastes time on ESPN that could be used to show more interesting sports, like bass fishing, ice dancing, or competitive eating, merits comment.
 
#15
#15
Anything that wastes time on ESPN that could be used to show more interesting sports, like bass fishing, ice dancing, or competitive eating, merits comment.

Same could be said for Nascar. The best thing about a race is the 5 hrs before it starts sitting in the hospitality tent and leaving after 5 laps to beat traffic. However, I do not go into the nascar threads to voice my opinion. Just a little respect thing
 
#17
#17
you can't honestly think in your head that watching womens basketball isn't less interesting than men's. also, how is it that the women get away with being less fundamentally sound just bc they are women? that's no excuse, anybody on scholarship for playing basketball, no matter the sex, should be able to hit at least 95% of their layups, especially if wide open......its 2 feet away for god sakes


beginning of unc ut game=my point proven
 
#19
#19
you can't honestly think in your head that watching womens basketball isn't less interesting than men's. also, how is it that the women get away with being less fundamentally sound just bc they are women? that's no excuse, anybody on scholarship for playing basketball, no matter the sex, should be able to hit at least 95% of their layups, especially if wide open......its 2 feet away for god sakes
personally, its just not as big. and most peoploe agree with me as men's is much more popular than women's basketball.
 
#20
#20
you can't honestly think in your head that watching womens basketball isn't less interesting than men's. also, how is it that the women get away with being less fundamentally sound just bc they are women? that's no excuse, anybody on scholarship for playing basketball, no matter the sex, should be able to hit at least 95% of their layups, especially if wide open......its 2 feet away for god sakes

Never said that but the possibility exists to enjoy both. I would also doubt Ramar Smith hit 95% of his layups so he should have his scholly pulled?
 
#23
#23
Anyone who willingly watches women's basketball would have to provide me with some documentation that their IQ is above room temperature.

ill have to agree with you on this one....it's just not ENTERTAINING, which is the whole reason sports exist in this country.....we don't give nba players millions of dollars to play like high school teams that don't have the athletic ability to make the game enjoyable
 
#24
#24
Those of you that hate women's ball. why would you want to mess up a thread for people that like it.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top