Look at this prediction...wow, we shouldnt even showup

#1

goodolerockytop2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2007
Messages
1,824
Likes
0
#1
Game of the Week
Tennessee at California — Saturday at 8 p.m. ET
Why to watch: The only game of the opening weekend featuring Top 25 teams is a rematch of last year's 35-18 Tennessee win that was even worse than the score indicated. If there's such a thing as a must-win situation in Week One, this is it for Cal, which despite blowing out Texas A&M in the Holiday Bowl is still looking for national respect, at least from the SEC folk. Even without RB Marshawn Lynch, the Bear offense will again be prolific behind big junior QB Nate Longshore and one of the most dangerous receiving corps in America. After excelling as a spare part for years, 5-8 Justin Forsett gets a grand stage to show that he's not too small to carry the load in the running game. Cal won't be the only team with something to prove in Berkeley as Tennessee has to start showing it's Tennessee again. Without an SEC title since 1998 and with barely a hint of any noise in the national title race since winning it all almost a decade ago, the natives are getting restless. The Vols are light on star power in 2007, which is why plenty of first-year players will contribute and QB Erik Ainge is being counted on to have the best season of his up-and-down college career.
Why Tennessee might win: Cal can score, but can it stop a quality SEC opponent from going up and down the field? This is the Bears' first game without defensive stars Brandon Mebane, Desmond Bishop and Daymeion Hughes, something that won't be lost on Ainge as he begins implementing UT's new no-huddle offense. Cal is green at corner and suspect up front, which means lots of time for Ainge and enough running room for Arian Foster to keep the Bear offense in hibernation. This is still Tennessee, and there are still plenty of NFL caliber athletes, even if they're not household names quite yet.

Why Cal might win: Last September, Tennessee had the dynamite receivers and Cal had the secondary that was still in diapers. This year, the roles are reversed. The Vols' first test with three new starters in the defensive backfield comes against the quartet of Jackson, Lavelle Hawkins, Robert Jordan and tight end Craig Stevens, which combined for 168 receptions in 2006. Tennessee is also very soft in the middle, so look for Alex Mack to create space for Forsett and James Montgomery, while displaying why he's one of the nation's premier centers.

Who to Watch: Last September, then-freshman CB Syd'Quan Thompson became the poster boy for Cal's loss to UT, getting burned repeatedly by Robert Meachem and Jayson Swain. Today, he's one of the emotional leaders of the defense, who'll be on a mission to shut down a Volunteer receiving corps that's a far cry from last year's group. Also worth watching will be the matchup of Tennessee's Britton Colquitt and Cal's DeSean Jackson, the SEC's best punter and the nation's premier punt returner, respectively.

What Will Happen: After getting embarrassed and knocked down a peg a year ago, Cal will get revenge on Tennessee in one of the biggest wins of the Jeff Tedford era. The Vols will get their yards, making heavy use of TEs Chris Smith and Brad Cottam, but it won't be enough with the Bear offense clicking. Jackson will crank out a highlight-reel play that'll ignite the home crowd and earn him some early Heisman attention in a thrilling game that'll be as good as advertised.

Line: California -5.5

Must See Rating: (5 Hef wants you to take his place on The Girls Next Door, but you can't because you have to watch this game - 1 Cavemen) ... 4.5

Fearless Prediction: California 30 … Tennessee 24
 
#2
#2
Somebody explain this "FOX" reporters thinking...how is our secondary in diapers?? 1 starter........and the #1 high school db prospect at that.....
 
#3
#3
Somebody explain this "FOX" reporters thinking...how is our secondary in diapers?? 1 starter........and the #1 high school db prospect at that.....

Who really has much experience in the secondary? Hefney and........? There's your diapers.
 
#4
#4
37 Antonio Gaines | 5-9, 185, Sr., 3V
14 Eric Berry | 5-11, 195, Fr., HS
41 Dennis Rogan | 5-10, 182, Fr., HS

31 Marsalous Johnson | 5-9, 185, So., 1V
24 D. Willingham | 6-0, 195, Jr., JC
25 Art Evans | 6-1, 185, Fr., HS

19 Jarod Parrish | 6-3, 197, Sr., 3V
20 Nevin McKenzie | 6-2, 210, Jr., JC
38 Antonio Wardlow | 6-1, 185, So., 1V

33 Jonathan Hefney | 5-10, 185, Sr., 3V
23 Ricardo Kemp | 5-11, 190, So., 1V
6 Ja'Kouri Williams | 5-10, 189, Jr., 2V

all but 1 has been in real time action
 
#5
#5
Not sure if this warrants a "wow, we shouldn't even showup" response. Each comment about why the other team could win sounded pretty reasonable to me. AND he picked Cal to win by 6, not 60. Take a look at the Louisville line for this week. Based on that line, their opponents really shouldn't show up.
 
#6
#6
Come on you know their prolific offense is just going to be too much for us. How could our guys possibly match up athletic wise. Oh G-d, please be Saturday. I cannot wait.
I am predicting 3 plus ints by Longshore.
 
#7
#7
Isn't Brad Cottam out for the season? The guy didn't do much homework but other than that he at least supports his opinion with something more than the tired and full of bull "revenge factor"......If I hear revenge factor again I am going to vomit.
 
#12
#12
Yeah but something he said i don't agree with.If tennessee gets their yards.We win,the only way we don't is if we turn it over and waste a lot of time going up and down the feild.
 
#13
#13
Not sure if this warrants a "wow, we shouldn't even showup" response. Each comment about why the other team could win sounded pretty reasonable to me. AND he picked Cal to win by 6, not 60. Take a look at the Louisville line for this week. Based on that line, their opponents really shouldn't show up.

I agree. The article was written well enough and the pick wasn't crazy. There was no Why Should UT Even Show Up mentality....

On the other hand, are we soft off the middle? When I hear that, I think our MLB and FS are soft...which is obviously not true. Or...was he talking about Bolden and Mapu...who, I guess, could be called soft until proven otherwise.
 
#14
#14
The question I have is who thought we would have "dynamite receivers" going in to the Cal game? There was no indication RM would have the season he did last year.
 
#15
#15
The question I have is who thought we would have "dynamite receivers" going in to the Cal game? There was no indication RM would have the season he did last year.

Yep. I have said this before. We may find another one Saturday....I doubt it because the game experience isn't there, which we did have (right?). But, no one was saying Meach was going to be All-SEC last year as I recall...
 
#16
#16
The question I have is who thought we would have "dynamite receivers" going in to the Cal game? There was no indication RM would have the season he did last year.

The most often forgotten point about what was thought of the Vols at this time last season. Meach, Swain, Smith were complete question marks going into Cal...
 
#17
#17
Not sure if this warrants a "wow, we shouldn't even showup" response. Each comment about why the other team could win sounded pretty reasonable to me. AND he picked Cal to win by 6, not 60. Take a look at the Louisville line for this week. Based on that line, their opponents really shouldn't show up.
based on the result last night, it appears that they didn't.
Yep. I have said this before. We may find another one Saturday....I doubt it because the game experience isn't there, which we did have (right?). But, no one was saying Meach was going to be All-SEC last year as I recall...
correct.

as for the analysis of the game, it seemed fair to me. let's face it, it's not a secret that our secondary is "unproven". I do think they will get better as the year goes along, but this is a fairly tall test for game one for 3 "new" starters.

the thing though that no one is really talking about, o/t to say it's motivation for Cal, is that the pressure in this game is all on Cal. EVERYONE expects them to win. the line has been moved up to 6.5 pts as of this morning. they're at home, they have the AA's, etc, etc, etc.....

i just wonder how they react when the big lights come on for a national audience and the memory of last year's game apparently still so fresh on their minds.

i've said it before, i like the spot we're in, emotionally and attitude wise. and while that won't win the game for us, i do think it helps. If we can get some execution and a pass rush on defense and stop the run a little bit, reduce errors offensively (penalties and turnovers), this game will be plenty competitive and close, for whoever wins. i can't see either team blowing the other out.

and at the end of the day, i still think we're more physical than Cal and that will play a role before the day is done.

Go Vols.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top