Line?

#6
#6
Does anyone else feel like that is a pretty wide line. Have we been drinking the orange cool-aid too much? That is significantly higher than last year's as I remember. Maybe VIA saw the size of that line, bet the farm, and that is why he was admittedly almost melting down over Ainge's injury......any truth VIA? :)
 
#7
#7
give em 3 for home field advantage....3 more for the hype.... true spread would be right around 3-4 pts......
 
#9
#9
Cal was favored by 3 last year in Knoxville, only hurt them.

I love the +6, we usually do very well on the road as an underdog against ranked teams.
 
#10
#10
I love the +6, we usually do very well on the road as an underdog against ranked teams.

we were 0-1 last year (Arkansas)
we were 1-2 in 2005 (loss against Florida, Notre Dame, win v. LSU - push against Bama) but straight up as a dog we were 1-3
In '04 we lost to Georgia - our only ranked team on the road - but we did win ATS

So I have us either 2-3 or 1-5 depending on what you mean:
2-3 with the spread, 1-5 straight up as the road dog
 
#11
#11
we were 0-1 last year (Arkansas)
we were 1-2 in 2005 (loss against Florida, Notre Dame, win v. LSU - push against Bama) but straight up as a dog we were 1-3
In '04 we lost to Georgia - our only ranked team on the road - but we did win ATS

So I have us either 2-3 or 1-5 depending on what you mean:
2-3 with the spread, 1-5 straight up as the road dog

I'm thinking Miami.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top