Lindsey Graham Compromised - Dems accuse his sexuality the root

#30
#30
zeppelin128 said:
Just saying that is what the rumor has been for decades now. I'm sure they have done their best to keep it private to avoid violence from the crazies.
Click to expand...
Oh BS. You can’t live in DC for 30 years with a secret like that and not have it come out. Not in this day and age. Today we would have pictures of J Edgar in a nice pink negligee within a year of the rumor.

Also this supposed republican was not named in the article where the democrat made the claim he was told by said Republican.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#31
#31
Rasputin_Vol said:
Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.
Click to expand...

I always assumed the turnaround had to do with the departure of Graham's vocal anti-Trump cronies (Corker, Flake, Ryan, etc) leaving him all alone as the lightning rod. That kind of attention causes plenty of people to rethink priorities and opinions. Funny thing is that I've never even thought about Graham's sexual preferences because he, unlike libs, doesn't prance around with whatever he/she/it may be on full display, so it just doesn't matter what his private preferences might or might not be. And I agree - I'm certainly not a fan of him either.
 
#32
#32
AM64 said:
I always assumed the turnaround had to do with the departure of Graham's vocal anti-Trump cronies (Corker, Flake, Ryan, etc) leaving him all alone as the lightning rod. That kind of attention causes plenty of people to rethink priorities and opinions. Funny thing is that I've never even thought about Graham's sexual preferences because he, unlike libs, doesn't prance around with whatever he/she/it may be on full display, so it just doesn't matter what his private preferences might or might not be. And I agree - I'm certainly not a fan of him either.
Click to expand...
Maybe Graham is asexual. Maybe he was born with no genitals. WGAF?
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-south and AM64
#34
#34
Mick said:
I don't know what the dems solution is but I would start with ports of entry along the border (where most illegal immigration, human trafficking, and drugs come into this country) and provide them with vehicle scanners. I think I read that would cost $300-800 million.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing you mean the inability or unwillingness to hunt down people who entered legally but have overstayed their welcome period? While that certainly needs to be fixed, it seems a lot easier and less costly to turn back a dozen or so illegals at a time with a good barrier and patrols than to individually hunt down people who've gone underground - especially knowing that courts will at most tell them to leave.
 
#36
#36
Rasputin_Vol said:
Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.
Click to expand...
you misspelled hypocritical. It has more than 3 letters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#37
#37
zeppelin128 said:
A republican brought up sexuality and fetishes. It is right there in your article and the tweet you posted. If anyone is making veiled threats and innuendos, it is Republicans pissed that Graham actually dares to sometimes criticize Lord Red Hat. They threaten him with exposing his sexuality because the Red Hats will crucify him at the polls, at the least. Classic right wing tactic of veiled threats if you don't fall in line.
Omar basically called him a hypocrite. She never once said anything about his sexuality, which really shouldn't matter at this point, I think it is the worst kept secret in DC. He's lived with a dude for like 30 years.
Click to expand...
I don't gaf what he does behind closed doors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321 and AM64
#42
#42
zeppelin128 said:
A republican brought up sexuality and fetishes. It is right there in your article and the tweet you posted. If anyone is making veiled threats and innuendos, it is Republicans pissed that Graham actually dares to sometimes criticize Lord Red Hat. They threaten him with exposing his sexuality because the Red Hats will crucify him at the polls, at the least. Classic right wing tactic of veiled threats if you don't fall in line.
Omar basically called him a hypocrite. She never once said anything about his sexuality, which really shouldn't matter at this point, I think it is the worst kept secret in DC. He's lived with a dude for like 30 years.
Click to expand...

So none of your Lord Red Hat stuff is supported in any article but you threw it out as if it's a fact then you say the facts are not there about the tweeter and Omar?

Actually if you read that tweet it says the Republican was directing the tweeter away from his sexual orientation and on to something else sexual related. He's correcting the tweeter. Regardless, the tweeter threw out an accusation that Graham could well be comprised because of some sexual activity. It's bush league. That actually did happen. I don't see anywhere where someone from the R side has done what you described them doing.

Omar said repeatedly he's "compromised" and "they got to him". That clearly implies she's saying he's being coerced by some threatening force to say things he doesn't believe. That's more than calling him a hypocrite.

I think it's bad behavior. Some of you seem to think it's fine.
 
#43
#43
MSNBC got in on it too.

Now purely by coincidence, a few days later MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle said on air that maaaaybe Lindsey Graham had some dark secret and that's why he was suddenly supportive of Trump. "It could be that Donald Trump or somebody knows something pretty extreme about Lindsey Graham," Ruhle said. "We’re gonna have to leave it there."


Democrats, MSNBC Should Punish the Lindsey Graham Gay-Baiters

Glenn Greenwald agrees with me.

 
#44
#44
Reddit on point with the photoshop for this trash.
 

Attachments

  • gettyimages-1046127856.jpg
    gettyimages-1046127856.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 10
#46
#46
If Lindsay Graham had a hint of being compromised I guarantee the secret service is aware of it and it's not a secret that he's gay to the ones that matter. This is just smear tactics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#48
#48
volinbham said:
So none of your Lord Red Hat stuff is supported in any article but you threw it out as if it's a fact then you say the facts are not there about the tweeter and Omar?

Actually if you read that tweet it says the Republican was directing the tweeter away from his sexual orientation and on to something else sexual related. He's correcting the tweeter. Regardless, the tweeter threw out an accusation that Graham could well be comprised because of some sexual activity. It's bush league. That actually did happen. I don't see anywhere where someone from the R side has done what you described them doing.

Omar said repeatedly he's "compromised" and "they got to him". That clearly implies she's saying he's being coerced by some threatening force to say things he doesn't believe. That's more than calling him a hypocrite.

I think it's bad behavior. Some of you seem to think it's fine.
Click to expand...
I never said it was okay behavior. It isn't. Politics is dirty, this isn't some new thing.
 
#50
#50
Rasputin_Vol said:
Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.
Click to expand...
Its the one sure way they can shame him with his party....or so they think.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top