Lindsey Graham Compromised - Dems accuse his sexuality the root

[volinbham]

Stay classy party of acceptance - not the first time Graham has been attacked by Dems for his possible sexual orientation.

Rep. Ilhan Omar Recklessly Accuses Lindsey Graham of Being 'Compromised'

Nice

Jon Cooper

✔@joncoopertweets
· Jan 13, 2019

A Republican just told me that he doubts @LindseyGrahamSC is kowtowing to Trump (and indirectly Putin) because he’s being blackmailed over his sexual orientation (an open secret) or even financial corruption. Rather, he thinks it probably involves some pretty serious sexual kink.​

Jon Cooper

✔@joncoopertweets

By the way, as an openly gay man myself, I couldn’t care less about Lindsey Graham's sex life (gay, straight or otherwise). However, Graham is the Senate Judiciary Chair and there’s a strong likelihood that he's being blackmailed by the Russians. If so, that needs to be revealed.​

​

 

[zeppelin128]

Stay classy party of acceptance - not the first time Graham has been attacked by Dems for his possible sexual orientation.

Rep. Ilhan Omar Recklessly Accuses Lindsey Graham of Being 'Compromised'

Nice

​

Jon Cooper​

✔@joncoopertweets​

· Jan 13, 2019​

A Republican just told me that he doubts @LindseyGrahamSC is kowtowing to Trump (and indirectly Putin) because he’s being blackmailed over his sexual orientation (an open secret) or even financial corruption. Rather, he thinks it probably involves some pretty serious sexual kink.​

​

Jon Cooper​

✔@joncoopertweets​

​

By the way, as an openly gay man myself, I couldn’t care less about Lindsey Graham's sex life (gay, straight or otherwise). However, Graham is the Senate Judiciary Chair and there’s a strong likelihood that he's being blackmailed by the Russians. If so, that needs to be revealed.​

​

Rep. Omar did not bring up Graham's sexuality, just to be clear.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.

 

[0nelilreb]

Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.

Nothing should seem odd anymore . All core party values are suspended if and when need be , everything no matter how insane it may seem at the time is now fair game , the end now openly justifies the means , whatever it takes . This is a direct byproduct of squeezing out moderates , when there’s no middle ground to stand on any longer people only have one extreme or the other to choose. The place in the middle where sane people use to stand and go “meh it doesn’t bother me so much one way or another “ is almost non existent .

 

[Mick]

Rep. Omar did not bring up Graham's sexuality, just to be clear.

A Republican just told me that he doubts @LindseyGrahamSC is kowtowing to Trump (and indirectly Putin) because he’s being blackmailed over his sexual orientation (an open secret) or even financial corruption. Rather, he thinks it probably involves some pretty serious sexual kink. - Jon Cooper.

You ruined Bhams anti-anti-trump narrative.

 

[Mick]

Nothing should seem odd anymore . All core party values are suspended if and when need be , everything no matter how insane it may seem at the time is now fair game , the ends now openly justifies the means , whatever it takes . This is a direct byproduct of squeezing out moderates , when there’s no middle ground to stand on any longer people only have one extreme or the other to choose. The place in the middle where sane people use to stand and go “meh it doesn’t bother me so much one way or another “ is almost non existent .

The middle ground is there but 37% of the population took a hard right turn and now believe a wall all along the southern border is going to make them "safe". The polar opposite view is open borders. I'm not hearing the saber rattling from that side. The middle ground that most agree is border security. Most of america is waiting for that 37% to be reasonable with respect to border security. Secure our ports of entry and work our way out.

 

[0nelilreb]

The middle ground is there but 37% of the population took a hard right turn and now believe a wall all along the southern border is going to make them "safe". The polar opposite view is open borders. I'm not hearing the saber rattling from that side. The middle ground that most agree is border security. Most of america is waiting for that 37% to be reasonable.

Don’t , just don’t . I just wrote a whole paragraph without mentioning either party and including both . Don’t even try that 30-37% crap that’s at fault . The people in the middle are being squeezed out and both sides are doing it . There’s never been talk of a “wall “ before , ok and now we have open socialist in Congress . So the it’s their fault argument doesn’t hold up .

 

[Orange_Crush]

A Republican just told me that he doubts @LindseyGrahamSC is kowtowing to Trump (and indirectly Putin) because he’s being blackmailed over his sexual orientation (an open secret) or even financial corruption. Rather, he thinks it probably involves some pretty serious sexual kink. - Jon Cooper.

You ruined Bhams anti-anti-trump narrative.

You guys need to get your story together. Half the time you tell us trump is hated by his party. And when you have something more than unsourced quotes...

 

[Orange_Crush]

The middle ground is there but 37% of the population took a hard right turn and now believe a wall all along the southern border is going to make them "safe". The polar opposite view is open borders. I'm not hearing the saber rattling from that side. The middle ground that most agree is border security. Most of america is waiting for that 37% to be reasonable with respect to border security. Secure our ports of entry and work our way out.

Since when has the supposed middle mattered? We'll have to build the wall to see if it'll work. right?

 

[Mick]

Don’t , just don’t . I just wrote a whole paragraph without mentioning either party and including both . Don’t even try that 30-37% crap that’s at fault . The people in the middle are being squeezed out and both sides are doing it . There’s never been talk of a “wall “ before , ok and now we have open socialist in Congress . So the it’s their fault argument doesn’t hold up .

Just saying the middle ground is there and I will blame the wallnuts. You take the all so wonderful idea of better border security and conclude that a wall is the one and only solution (It's not even close to a solution) and dig in on that position. Damn right I blame the redhatted idiots that see a wall as a solution.

 

[Orange_Crush]

Just saying the middle ground is there and I will blame the wallnuts. You take the all so wonderful idea of better border security and conclude that a wall is the one and only solution (It's not even close to a solution) and dig in on that position. Damn right I blame the redhatted idiots that see a wall as a solution.

Now that they know you will blame them, they're calling a meeting now to change their stance and see how to appease you and get you back in their corner. Well played.

 

[0nelilreb]

Just saying the middle ground is there and I will blame the wallnuts. You take the all so wonderful idea of better border security and conclude that a wall is the one and only solution (It's not even close to a solution) and dig in on that position. Damn right I blame the redhatted idiots that see a wall as a solution.

What is the dims “ solution “ ? Example : how many are running for president in 2020? The left can’t figure out where they are on the scale anymore they are so fractured and the wall is the big problem ? Pull back on the magnification and look at the bigger picture . The wall , like it’s been mentioned several times in here ( I believe ) is just a political chip or pawn both sides want the win on it and both have decided to make it the hill they are digging in on . The answer to Trump isn’t AntiTrump in 2020 ( hard left ) , that will just cause a rebound back . These political hacks better find some moderate candidates to go in or we are just going to continue this cycle of hard left and right .

 

[McDad]

If Barney Frank can serve without concern of compromise, anybody can. Personally, I'm still hoping for a plague which attacks federal politicians.

 

[McDad]

Now that they know you will blame them, they're calling a meeting now to change their stance and see how to appease you and get you back in their corner. Well played.

I detect a high level of sass in your post. We should, as a board, designate Friday as our back sass day.

 

[theFallGuy]

Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.

It's not odd at all. In fact, this is quite normal.

 

[Mick]

What is the dims “ solution “ ? Example : how many are running for president in 2020? The left can’t figure out where they are on the scale anymore they are so fractured and the wall is the big problem ? Pull back on the magnification and look at the bigger picture . The wall , like it’s been mentioned several times in here ( I believe ) is just a political chip or pawn both sides want the win on it and both have decided to make it the hill they are digging in on . The answer to Trump isn’t AntiTrump in 2020 ( hard left ) , that will just cause a rebound back . These political hacks better find some moderate candidates to go in or we are just going to continue this cycle of hard left and right .

I don't know what the dems solution is but I would start with ports of entry along the border (where most illegal immigration, human trafficking, and drugs come into this country) and provide them with vehicle scanners. I think I read that would cost $300-800 million.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Isnt it a little weird that the pro gay civil rights would attempt to use possible gay sexual innuendo as a political weapon?

Forget what the word is..something the democrat party and its supporters wallow in constantly..begins with an H..

 

[FLVOL_79]

Not a fan of Lindsey Graham, although he has seemed to have turned around over the last year or so... but its odd that the Dems would engage in shaming someone over sexual orientation.

It would be odd if one didn't understand that democrats and their pursuit of liberty and freedom only applies to them. When an issue can be weaponized to be used against a political opponent no subject is off limits. Opponent maybe gay? OUT HIM/HER! Opponent White? Obvious White Supremacist/Racist/Klansman/Nazi/Christopher Columbus devotee. Opponent a woman? She is an obvious Whore/Intellectually Challenged/In an abusive relationship. Opponent black? Uncle Tom/White Privileged. Opponent an American? Become pro non American citizen/terrorist/drug-human trafficker/criminal/felon.

 

[AirVol]

The party that screeches about judging people are judging people?
Figures, they are great at being hypocrites.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

Good place to leave this.

 

[volinbham]

Rep. Omar did not bring up Graham's sexuality, just to be clear.

She's peddling the rumor that is based around it - she danced like crazy on CNN

 

[zeppelin128]

She's peddling the rumor that is based around it - she danced like crazy on CNN

A republican brought up sexuality and fetishes. It is right there in your article and the tweet you posted. If anyone is making veiled threats and innuendos, it is Republicans pissed that Graham actually dares to sometimes criticize Lord Red Hat. They threaten him with exposing his sexuality because the Red Hats will crucify him at the polls, at the least. Classic right wing tactic of veiled threats if you don't fall in line.
Omar basically called him a hypocrite. She never once said anything about his sexuality, which really shouldn't matter at this point, I think it is the worst kept secret in DC. He's lived with a dude for like 30 years.

 

[Orange_Vol1321]

Stay classy party of acceptance - not the first time Graham has been attacked by Dems for his possible sexual orientation.

Rep. Ilhan Omar Recklessly Accuses Lindsey Graham of Being 'Compromised'

Nice

Jon Cooper

✔@joncoopertweets
· Jan 13, 2019

A Republican just told me that he doubts @LindseyGrahamSC is kowtowing to Trump (and indirectly Putin) because he’s being blackmailed over his sexual orientation (an open secret) or even financial corruption. Rather, he thinks it probably involves some pretty serious sexual kink.​

Jon Cooper

✔@joncoopertweets

By the way, as an openly gay man myself, I couldn’t care less about Lindsey Graham's sex life (gay, straight or otherwise). However, Graham is the Senate Judiciary Chair and there’s a strong likelihood that he's being blackmailed by the Russians. If so, that needs to be revealed.​

​

Lmao. Putin is the busiest som b!tch this side of the sun.

 

[1972 Grad]

A republican brought up sexuality and fetishes. It is right there in your article and the tweet you posted. If anyone is making veiled threats and innuendos, it is Republicans pissed that Graham actually dares to sometimes criticize Lord Red Hat. They threaten him with exposing his sexuality because the Red Hats will crucify him at the polls, at the least. Classic right wing tactic of veiled threats if you don't fall in line.
Omar basically called him a hypocrite. She never once said anything about his sexuality, which really shouldn't matter at this point, I think it is the worst kept secret in DC. He's lived with a dude for like 30 years.

....and the name of this "dude" since it's not a secret.

 

[05_never_again]

Politician you like changes views over time: "It isn't a flip flop, they evolved."
Politician you dislike changes views over time: "They're compromised!"