You're so full of BS, it's ridiculous. The fact that Texas A&M threw a sky-high offer at Chavis to lure him away from LSU says a lot about the "demand for Chavis" which you imply is non-existent.
You throwing around insults doesn't help your cause. I never implied any such thing as you suggest, its like you are having a mystery conversation with yourself.
I never implied there was no demand for Chavis, matter of fact, there was, which is why LSU actually offered more.
Your comment is just incredibly stupid to begin with.
More insults does not help your cause.
LSU is a top 10 program. The fact that Chavis accepted the job there in '08 doesn't mean he couldn't have gotten a job somewhere else.
I never said he couldn't get another job, I said he was basically fired, no I don't believe he was hot demand at that time.
He was a top 5 DC nationally at UT and he was a top 5 DC nationally at LSU. There's always been plenty of demand for Chavis.
Never said there would be no demand, nobody was knocking down the door, I mean you do know the Vols let him go?
He was a good hire for LSU, not sure what you problem is.
However, I suspect that Alleva's view on Chavis was very similar to your own. Alleva viewed Chavis as a "commodity" and was insulted that he might actually understand his own value. Too bad for Alleva (and morons like you), Chavis went where he was wanted.
Who cares? LSU offered him good money, he rejected, I see no problem with that.... bye.
Calling me a moron for a DC being offered basically the highest assistant coaching salary or close to it (and rejecting it) somehow has anything to do with me being a moron is kind of funny. Maybe I am a moron, but he was offered good money.... he rejected the offers... which is okay in my book but he then proceed to burn the bridge which is the subject of the litigation.
The result is that your all's defense has gone from the #13 in the nation in defensive efficiency last year to #32 this year.
1. Its not my (your) defense.
2. So, if this had to do with Chavis, not sure what can be done... he was offered great money and rejected it, so mostly irrelevant.
Pretty good chance LSU might be 9-2 or 10-1 right now with Chavis. (Also, fwiw, Chavis absolutely owned Texas A&M while at LSU).
Not sure about that, but even if true, he rejected a great offer. I see no reason to pay him more, matter of fact, I wouldn't mind LSU making cuts across the board.
Don't blame the Mad Hatter for your woes. The issues fall squarely on Alleva.
Not sure I am blaming anyone, actually I have said 2-3 years ago that plans need to be put for a replacement for Les medium-term. 10-15 years is plenty of time.
I actually like Les, which is why all of your hyperbole is quite humorous and insane, I do want to kick him in the nuts probably once a game though.

ESPN has created a story whether that was leaked by the AD or not, I don't know, but a decision has to be made within the next couple of weeks, if not by next Monday or this will probably turn out fairly bad. Ole well.
I'm not sure if you are just having a terrible day or what but most of your comments seem to be a conversation with someone else, calling me names really isn't going to help your day... but hate on if you must, I'm actually getting a kick out of it.
As far as Chavis, he was unemployed, LSU got him fairly cheap, LSU rewarded him over and over, LSU offered him a great contract, he rejected the offer.... Chavis is not being sued because he rejected an offer... coaches leave or get fired all the time. Chavis turned his back on the players and in the process, my speculation is that he violated portions of the contract and owes LSU funds.
For some reason you are emotionally attached, to be honest, I think Chavis did a good job at LSU but maybe his true colors came out at the end. I see nothing wrong with him rejecting the contract... bye.
Les is a good coach, to be honest, not going to be easy to replace as some think, but either way the game is well under way one way or another. If LSU has support to pay the bill, then they will have to make a move in the next couple of weeks if they want to have a successful 2016 or the AD is going to have to say he will be back.