Lennon Creer

#2
#2
Just put 149 and 2 tds on Boise State. That gives him 448 and 6 tds in his last 3 games. He struggled early but he has figured out that offense now.
 
#3
#3
Solid player, too bad things played out how they did. At least we got Denarius out of the deal.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#4
#4
Noone wants to talk about how bad he is and how kiffin made the right decision putting him at the bottom of the depth chart?
 
#5
#5
BigOrangePassion1 said:
Noone wants to talk about how bad he is and how kiffin made the right decision putting him at the bottom of the depth chart?
Click to expand...

Bottom of the depth chart at UT is top at LA Tech. Just because he's good there doesn't mean he was misplaced on the depth chart at UT.
 
#6
#6
Glad to see he's being successful at La Tech. I watched a few minutes of the game and both he and Paige looked good. Wish we still had both of them just for depth sake.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
#10
#10
BigOrangePassion1 said:
Unfortunately for your argument his results at UT say otherwise.
Click to expand...

and please stop. i think creer had the potential to be a decent back at ut, but he still should have been behind hardesty on the depth chart while he was there. like hohen said, there's a difference most of the time between starters at ut and starters at la tech.
 
#13
#13
duckman398686 said:
and please stop. i think creer had the potential to be a decent back at ut, but he still should have been behind hardesty on the depth chart while he was there. like hohen said, there's a difference most of the time between starters at ut and starters at la tech.
Click to expand...

Who said he should have been ahead of hardesty last year. In previous years, yes. He was alot better than hardesty the previous years. Last year hardesty finally put it together. But he should have been 2nd or 3rd on the depth chart instead of 5th. We could really use him right now as a second quality back, we dont have that.
 
#15
#15
kptvol said:
Yup. Transferring because you're fourth on the depth chart in your third year is the stuff legends are made of.
Click to expand...

This is your argument? Lane kiffin didnt think he was good? He stats were good. When he got to play, he looked good. But lane kiffin said he wasnt. OK
 
#16
#16
droski said:
i forgot that only on a tenn board is ltech playing more than terrible competition.
Click to expand...

Well they didnt play terrible competition last night, and regardless 448 yds and 6 tds in 3 games is solid for any d-1 player. We could definitely use him right now. Our previous coach ran him out for an overrated freshman.
 
#17
#17
BigOrangePassion1 said:
Who said he should have been ahead of hardesty last year. In previous years, yes. He was alot better than hardesty the previous years. Last year hardesty finally put it together. But he should have been 2nd or 3rd on the depth chart instead of 5th. We could really use him right now as a second quality back, we dont have that.
Click to expand...

He was never at any point better than Hardesty. Don't be crazy.
 
#19
#19
BigOrangePassion1 said:
Well they didnt play terrible competition last night, and regardless 448 yds and 6 tds in 3 games is solid for any d-1 player. We could definitely use him right now. Our previous coach ran him out for an overrated freshman.
Click to expand...

Creer was fourth on the depth chart before those freshmen arrived. He didn't want to put in the work and now he's at a place where it isn't required.
 
#20
#20
BigOrangePassion1 said:
Well they didnt play terrible competition last night, and regardless 448 yds and 6 tds in 3 games is solid for any d-1 player. We could definitely use him right now. Our previous coach ran him out for an overrated freshman.
Click to expand...

why would he run out a guy who was good enough to be #2? that doesnt' seem in his best self interest.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top