Lamichael James

#6
#6
If we come out like we did against Cal in 06 it won't matter if he is back or not. However, that's a big IF.
 
#18
#18
tell us about Ainge and the differences.

better footwork, better pocket presence, better checkdown. erik was just a better QB.

we wanted him pretty badly as a matter of fact. i believe he made the right choice coming to UT rather than possibly spending his career stuck behind clemens and dixon.

so you tell me, do you honestly believe simms has the same potential?
 
#19
#19
ainge was his 3rd year in the program and had better receivers. that is your answer.
 
#21
#21
better footwork, better pocket presence, better checkdown. erik was just a better QB.

he never had any of the above. His checks came from the sidelines. He was never allowed to throw down the field because it overwhelmed his brain. He was scared in the pocket for the entirety of his career. Cutcliffe built our offense around a bunch of three step drop deliveries because it was the extent of what the guy could handle. When we tried to run a real offense around him, it was the biggest disaster in the history of our program.

we wanted him pretty badly as a matter of fact. i believe he made the right choice coming to UT rather than possibly spending his career stuck behind clemens and dixon.

so you tell me, do you honestly believe simms has the same potential?

See Bold.

I absolutely believe Simms has the same potential, but that's just not a very high bar. I know for absolutely certain that Bray has more potential.
 
#22
#22
better footwork, better pocket presence, better checkdown. erik was just a better QB.

we wanted him pretty badly as a matter of fact. i believe he made the right choice coming to UT rather than possibly spending his career stuck behind clemens and dixon.

so you tell me, do you honestly believe simms has the same potential?

Ainge was coming off a disaster of a sophomore season. He was no sure thing going into the Cal game.
 

VN Store



Back
Top