Kyle Rittenhouse - The Truth in 11 Minutes

#527
#527
Septic said:
I think the important take away here is that society should be arming more kids to roam the streets enforcing the law because, what could go wrong?
Click to expand...

Was he enforcing the law, or protecting himself? Seems it was a good thing he was armed given the number of “peaceful protesters” attacking him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed, SpaceCoastVol, InVOLuntary and 1 other person
#528
#528
The examples that were thrown out, were scenarios where Rittenhouse, defended his sister, called the cops on someone stealing..and a picture with the proud boys doing nothing..Weak case so far althought I am curious of the "new" FBI drone footage...curious as to what it shows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#531
#531
Vol8188 said:
Was he enforcing the law, or protecting himself? Seems it was a good thing he was armed given the number of “peaceful protesters” attacking him
Click to expand...

He was looking for trouble, and found it. What do they say about stupid games and stupid prizes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54
#533
#533
Septic said:
He was looking for trouble, and found it. What do they say about stupid games and stupid prizes?
Click to expand...

A lot of people on your side of politics want to ruin a young man’s entire life over this. So I think we should be really clear on these things.

How was he looking for trouble?

Does any of your answer to question 1 negate the fact that he was attacked and defended himself?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#534
#534
Vol8188 said:
A lot of people on your side of politics want to ruin a young man’s entire life over this. So I think we should be really clear on these things.

How was he looking for trouble?

Does any of your answer to question 1 negate the fact that he was attacked and defended himself?
Click to expand...
If you’re going to ask “how was he looking for trouble,” I think you should give a brief recitation of your understanding of the facts from the time he left his house until the time he got arrested so that we can more easily identify why you think that’s a legitimate question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
#535
#535
RockyTop85 said:
If you’re going to ask “how was he looking for trouble,” I think you should give a brief recitation of your understanding of the facts from the time he left his house until the time he got arrested so that we can more easily identify why you think that’s a legitimate question.
Click to expand...

Go ahead….you believe he was “looking for trouble” and that there’s a piece of the story I don’t know or understand.

So let’s stop with the circles. Go ahead and explain.
 
#536
#536
Vol8188 said:
Go ahead….you believe he was “looking for trouble” and that there’s a piece of the story I don’t know or understand.

So let’s stop with the circles. Go ahead and explain.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Circles is what I'm trying to avoid.

That’s why I’m asking you to recite your understanding of the facts, where it isn’t glaringly obvious that he went looking for trouble. Then I will be glad to tell you what you got wrong.
 
#537
#537
RockyTop85 said:
Exactly. Circles is what I'm trying to avoid.

You recite your understanding of the facts where it isn’t glaringly obvious that he went looking for trouble and I will be glad to tell you what you got wrong.
Click to expand...

Circles is what you’re accomplishing. You seem to be making the claim that he came looking for trouble. I’m not claiming that.

Please support your claim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, NorthDallas40, SpaceCoastVol and 2 others
#540
#540
Vol8188 said:
Circles is what you’re accomplishing. You seem to be making the claim that he came looking for trouble. I’m not claiming that.

Please support your claim.
Click to expand...

No thanks. The undisputed facts speak for themselves on that issue.

If you’re unfamiliar with the facts, it seems safe to assume that it’s willful and the question wasn’t asked in good faith.

If you are familiar with the facts, then you think that your refusal to acknowledge the obvious is somehow original, clever, or persuasive and the question still wasn’t asked in good faith.

Either way, your opinion is nearly worthless and trying to change your mind is not appealing to me. I suspect you’ll eventually find somebody else willing to beat you about the head with the facts and you’ll pretend they haven’t and believe that your refusal to concede results in a stalemate. Best of luck.
 
#543
#543
Much like the state is having issues in proving Rittenhouse was the instigator...they make the claim they have to prove...if you cant then why make the claim?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
#544
#544
Septic said:
He was looking for trouble, and found it. What do they say about stupid games and stupid prizes?
Click to expand...

I don’t know what he was looking for but he found 3 leftist scum (or they found him). 2 of them no longer exist and 1 of them is missing his bicep!

5nouo9.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: lukeneyland and davethevol
#545
#545
RockyTop85 said:
No thanks. The undisputed facts speak for themselves on that issue.

If you’re unfamiliar with the facts, it seems safe to assume that it’s willful and the question wasn’t asked in good faith.

If you are familiar with the facts, then you think that your refusal to acknowledge the obvious is somehow original, clever, or persuasive and the question still wasn’t asked in good faith.

Either way, your opinion is nearly worthless and trying to change your mind is not appealing to me. I suspect you’ll eventually find somebody else willing to beat you about the head with the facts and you’ll pretend they haven’t and believe that your refusal to concede results in a stalemate. Best of luck.
Click to expand...

You seem to believe there’s facts in this case that makes this young man guilty of murder, not self defense, as you imply that he instigated the engagement.

Instead of simply stating these facts you’ve requested me to provide you with a complete time line of events.

Why not simply tell me what I’m missing? It’s very possible I’ve simply never heard fact x, that you believe to be pivotal.

It would require a lot less time than you’ve already devoted
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, davethevol and Rickyvol77
#546
#546
RockyTop85 said:
No, not completely but it’s small circles to avoid much bigger and dumber circles.
Click to expand...

This is the problem with politics today and it mainly comes from the left. A lack of willingness to engage in a genuine exchange of ideas and opinions because you believe the other side is in some way evil, unreasonable, irrational, etc. I miss the days of people like Jon Stewart who were willing to engage in dialogue

This view is overwhelmingly what fuels cancel culture
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, NorthDallas40, hog88 and 2 others
#547
#547
RockyTop85 said:
No thanks. The undisputed facts speak for themselves on that issue.

If you’re unfamiliar with the facts, it seems safe to assume that it’s willful and the question wasn’t asked in good faith.

If you are familiar with the facts, then you think that your refusal to acknowledge the obvious is somehow original, clever, or persuasive and the question still wasn’t asked in good faith.

Either way, your opinion is nearly worthless and trying to change your mind is not appealing to me. I suspect you’ll eventually find somebody else willing to beat you about the head with the facts and you’ll pretend they haven’t and believe that your refusal to concede results in a stalemate. Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Bwaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaa 🤡

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, UT_Dutchman, davethevol and 1 other person
#548
#548
Vol8188 said:
How was he looking for trouble? Do you feel the same about the BLM and antifa members there that day?
Click to expand...

He willingly entered into a volatile situation where he thought a AR15 would be necessary, you can tell by the way he brought his AR15 to a riot. And yes, I feel the same way about the BLM and antifa members.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54 and USAFgolferVol
#549
#549
Vol8188 said:
This is the problem with politics today and it mainly comes from the left. A lack of willingness to engage in a genuine exchange of ideas and opinions because you believe the other side is in some way evil, unreasonable, irrational, etc. I miss the days of people like Jon Stewart who were willing to engage in dialogue

This view is overwhelmingly what fuels cancel culture
Click to expand...

I mostly agree, which is why I asked you to express a basis for your idea/opinion. You declined and I concluded that you’re either uninformed or making an argument in bad faith.
 
#550
#550
Septic said:
He willingly entered into a volatile situation where he thought a AR15 would be necessary, you can tell by the way he brought his AR15 to a riot. And yes, I feel the same way about the BLM and antifa members.
Click to expand...

I just want to clarify. Do you believe going armed in some way negates his innate right to self defense?

I’m typing this message while traveling, armed, to Taco Bell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and davethevol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top