volwarrior33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,854
- Likes
- 0
I agree with eric to an extent on this. I think given our situation it was going to be very hard to get a "big name" coach. I don't know if keeping Kippy would have the worst choice out there. I do believe we are better off with Dooley though. I was actually rooting for Kippy to get the job at one time. I lost some respect for him after he preached loyalty,UT is a family,there is no doom & gloom, etc. He said moving is over rated, & he was not a "west coast" guy etc. Then he straight BOLTS! Lol... I would have liked him stay on staff though, but I guess he had too much pride. On the other hand, I do agree were better off with Dooley at the helm. Jmo.Kippy would have been a BAD experiment, IMO. No HC experience, coupled with limited recruiting in many years, would have led us down a darker path than some think we are on right now. At least Dooley has been in the HS that we are currently trying to recruit. His last name also carries weight in the state we are trying to poach for talent.
I agree. Nice post!Something I want to know about the Dooley haters... were you excited about the Kiffin hire? I mean if you look at the 2 men they actually have a lot in common
Both are sons of legendary coaches... Vince Dooley and Monte Kiffin
Both are extremely passionate about coaching football and recruiting...
Both at their previous gigs had a very big role in building National Championship teams Kiffin with USC under Pete Carrol and Dooley at LSU under Nick Saban...
Both left their "mentors" to take head coaching gigs
Both had pretty lousy records at said HC gigs
Both got their big breaks from Mike Hamilton offering them the Head Coaching job at UT
Both put together top notch coaching staffs... who are known for both their coaching abilities and recruiting
The only difference in the two is their demeanor and the way they do their jobs... Kiffin is a personality all about the lights and attention Dooley is more low key and seems to be more about doing things to build a legacy here at UT. And I say that comes from their raising Kiffin is SoCal guy and lives that way... Dooley is Southern man and lives that way... If you don't like the Dooley hire.. that's fine.. but how can you not like this hire and supported Kiffin? if anything else you know Dooley knows what it takes to win in the SEC he was raised on the stuff
Something I want to know about the Dooley haters... were you excited about the Kiffin hire? I mean if you look at the 2 men they actually have a lot in common
Both are sons of legendary coaches... Vince Dooley and Monte Kiffin
Both are extremely passionate about coaching football and recruiting...
Both at their previous gigs had a very big role in building National Championship teams Kiffin with USC under Pete Carrol and Dooley at LSU under Nick Saban...
Both left their "mentors" to take head coaching gigs
Both had pretty lousy records at said HC gigs
Both got their big breaks from Mike Hamilton offering them the Head Coaching job at UT
Both put together top notch coaching staffs... who are known for both their coaching abilities and recruiting
The only difference in the two is their demeanor and the way they do their jobs... Kiffin is a personality all about the lights and attention Dooley is more low key and seems to be more about doing things to build a legacy here at UT. And I say that comes from their raising Kiffin is SoCal guy and lives that way... Dooley is Southern man and lives that way... If you don't like the Dooley hire.. that's fine.. but how can you not like this hire and supported Kiffin? if anything else you know Dooley knows what it takes to win in the SEC he was raised on the stuff
We were married to Coach Fulmer for 35 years. Those kids WERE HIS KIDS. His speech didn't hurt the program.
Tell me...What would you have said to those kids? Really!!! Think about it!!!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
There's a very good reason Kippy has never been a college HC or a coordinator on any level. There's a very good reason that every year when the fb season ends, his name is never brought up nor does he interview for a HC job.
With the exception of the XFL year, he's been a position coach his entire career.
There's a very good reason Kippy has never been a college HC or a coordinator on any level. There's a very good reason that every year when the fb season ends, his name is never brought up nor does he interview for a HC job.
With the exception of the XFL year, he's been a position coach his entire career.
Something I want to know about the Dooley haters... were you excited about the Kiffin hire? I mean if you look at the 2 men they actually have a lot in common
Both are sons of legendary coaches... Vince Dooley and Monte Kiffin
Both are extremely passionate about coaching football and recruiting...
Both at their previous gigs had a very big role in building National Championship teams Kiffin with USC under Pete Carrol and Dooley at LSU under Nick Saban...
Both left their "mentors" to take head coaching gigs
Both had pretty lousy records at said HC gigs
Both got their big breaks from Mike Hamilton offering them the Head Coaching job at UT
Both put together top notch coaching staffs... who are known for both their coaching abilities and recruiting
The only difference in the two is their demeanor and the way they do their jobs... Kiffin is a personality all about the lights and attention Dooley is more low key and seems to be more about doing things to build a legacy here at UT. And I say that comes from their raising Kiffin is SoCal guy and lives that way... Dooley is Southern man and lives that way... If you don't like the Dooley hire.. that's fine.. but how can you not like this hire and supported Kiffin? if anything else you know Dooley knows what it takes to win in the SEC he was raised on the stuff
at least DD was a HC. Being the HC of a 1 yr league isnt a resume booster
at least DD was a HC. Being the HC of a 1 yr league isnt a resume booster
1. Anywhere from 3-9 to 5-7. Probably not good.1) What do you think KB's record would have been? What would the consensus reaction be to that record?
2) Who would have been your *REALISTIC* ideal hire when the time came to replace Kippy? When would we have hired?
3) How would you see the '11 recruiting class filling out with your hire from #2 at the time we hired him?
4) Do you think keeping KB as HC would be a good career move for Mike Hamilton?
5) And finally, how would have the players on our existing rosters have advanced with KB?
Better than La Tech, where doubling as AD was part of the allure. Remember that you're shortly going to have to justify his losing record and breakeven conf job based upon the sorriness of the program. I can appreciate the point, but both were awful options to me, on simply had an easier out.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
If I'm not mistaken, Muschamp told Hamilton about Dooley and that Muschamp told Hamilton that it might be a good idea to grab Dooley while you can, before someone else does.
Dooley may not be sexy right now, but if given a chance, he might be that frog that turns into a prince.
If I'm not mistaken, Muschamp told Hamilton about Dooley and that Muschamp told Hamilton that it might be a good idea to grab Dooley while you can, before someone else does.
Dooley may not be sexy right now, but if given a chance, he might be that frog that turns into a prince.