Kiffin & Co. have committed numerous violations in the last 72 hours

#1
BROOKSPW

BROOKSPW

@brookspw on the twitter
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
346
Likes
0
#1
http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/AMA/recruiting_calendars/DI/Text/Football.pdf That is a link to recruiting calendar.

January 11-14: Dead Period, though staff are allowed to have contact with recruits who have been admitted for mid-year enrollment.
Click to expand...

This happened on the 12th.
1. Ogre called current UT EEs -- violation
2. Ogre (and others?) called other UT recruits. This is a dead period. -- violation
3. Ogre used a UT phone -- violation
4. Monte Kiffin mentioned a recruit's name on the radio yesterday, 1/14 -- violation.
5. Lane Kiffin did the same -- violation
6. Lane denied Ogre calling when he knew it was true -- violation.
 
#2
#2
Definition: A "Dead Period," as the name implies, is a time when nearly all recruiting activity is temporarily shut down.
During a dead period, coaches cannot:

-- Make in-person recruiting contacts
Click to expand...

Which he did in offering them to USC.
 
#3
#3
Question is, were they employed by anyone at the time? If not officially at USC yet, who gets in trouble with the NCAA? These weasels will find a way out of it.
 
#4
#4
Georgia Vol said:
Question is, were they employed by anyone at the time? If not officially at USC yet, who gets in trouble with the NCAA? These weasels will find a way out of it.
Click to expand...

If they are acting on behalf of USC, then they would be liable if a violation occurred. Extra benefits violations can be committed by others besides employees.
 
#6
#6
During a dead period aren't you allowed to call recruits once over the course of the period? So calling UT's recruits isn't a violation unless he did it more than once.

Allvol is right that who they are acting on behalf of matters. Not only that, but if they're not officially part of USC's staff wouldn't recruiting at all be against the rules since only USC's coaches are allowed to recruit?

There were definitely some violations, although I'm not sure if any of them are major. We already know about mentioning recruits by name.
 
#8
#8
WoMI said:
http://web1.ncaa.org/web_files/AMA/recruiting_calendars/DI/Text/Football.pdf That is a link to recruiting calendar.



This happened on the 12th.
1. Ogre called current UT EEs -- violation
2. Ogre (and others?) called other UT recruits. This is a dead period. -- violation
3. Ogre used a UT phone -- violation
4. Monte Kiffin mentioned a recruit's name on the radio yesterday, 1/14 -- violation.
5. Lane Kiffin did the same -- violation
6. Lane denied Ogre calling when he knew it was true -- violation.
Click to expand...

But would they be anything other than secondary violations? I think we all know how those f***sticks feel about those.
 
#9
#9
NWGVol said:
But would they be anything other than secondary violations? I think we all know how those f***sticks feel about those.
Click to expand...

I think some of those are big time, i.e. them contacting another school's EE's without permission.
 
#10
#10
I'm hearing something about USC under 3 year probation and possibly not a bowl game...
 
#12
#12
Can someone double check these violations? I would give my undivided attention to nonpstop calling the rules enforcement dept of the ncaa to lower the boom on these pissants
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#13
#13
Behuman13 said:
I'm hearing something about USC under 3 year probation and possibly not a bowl game...
Click to expand...

I heard, not read yet, that the New York Times reporting three years prob. and no TV. If true, thats going to effect the mighty recruiting machine that is Kiffins Gang.
 
#14
#14
Behuman13 said:
I'm hearing something about USC under 3 year probation and possibly not a bowl game...
Click to expand...



They said that on Basillio today. His sidekick said he just got a text saying that and Tony made him double check and it turned out to be what they got slapped with from the 1980s.

Hopefully they will get a lot worse than that...
 
#15
#15
general_93 said:
I heard, not read yet, that the New York Times reporting three years prob. and no TV. If true, thats going to effect the mighty recruiting machine that is Kiffins Gang.
Click to expand...

I would love that to happen. And no bowl.
It would be great..
 
#17
#17
showdogvol said:
Can someone double check these violations? I would give my undivided attention to nonpstop calling the rules enforcement dept of the ncaa to lower the boom on these pissants
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...


please do

they need to be fully aware of any possible violations these guys committed AFTER they left UT :)


then again, that could make them look into the past year here too :eek:hmy:
 
#18
#18
Phil lend us a hand here buddy.....give the NCAA a call as an interested bystander.
 
#20
#20
general_93 said:
I heard, not read yet, that the New York Times reporting three years prob. and no TV. If true, thats going to effect the mighty recruiting machine that is Kiffins Gang.
Click to expand...

The article^ going around is from 1982. Easy mistake to make, though.
 
#21
#21
It's all fine and dandy when Kiffin was committing violations at UT, correct? Running what basically was a brothel, talking about unsigned recruits on the radio, can go on and on. He's scum.
 
#23
#23
The fact that USC is under investigation right now, really makes me question why Kiffin would go there. They have to be bordering on lack of institutional control with the OJ Mayo thing they admitted to in combination with Reggie Bush/Joe McKnight. Of course, Lane's IQ is in the high 60's so I guess he probably did not think about that. I hope the NCAA hits them hard. This Reggie Bush investigation has been going on for 3 years.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top