- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 95,083
- Likes
- 67,592
To be fair, no one has a freaking clue what you're babbling about anymore. I'm beginning to think you've even confused yourself
Give me a break. Diversity offices, such as the one in question, serve underrepresented groups. Which would imply that there is no equity among groups, races, etc. White men still have it made, regardless of what they tell you ( white male here). The gender neutral pronoun and Christmas party stuff is extremely stupid (conservative Christian here), but there's a legitimate need for diversity in our world, especially at a place like UT that's supposed to represent an enlighten segment of society.
Cutting the budget item was a punitive measure and not a part of sound fiscal policy. That's the point you can't seem to grasp of just willfully ignore . It was done out of spite
What are the salaries, office costs, retirement programs, how many employees, etc.???? Do you know these answers, or are you just spouting off with a knee jerk reaction? I believe we are talking budget cuts.
I can easily grasp that concept. Oh, BTW, I'm glad you've dropped the "stupid act" for just on second, and got back on the subject of Budget. The assertion that this budget cutting measure is nothing more than a punitive measure, is not a fact. Without knowing what we are getting for $5,000,000.00/year, it may very well turn out to be a sound financial decision. I've yet to see any figures as to things such as salaries, and costs. Without that info, you're pulling "Punitive measure" out of thin air.
Cutting the budget item was a punitive measure and not a part of sound fiscal policy. That's the point you can't seem to grasp of just willfully ignore . It was done out of spite
Was spite the motive for the "diversity" office's call to ban CHRISTmas parties? Maybe a call to be discriminatory against CHRISTians? Seems a little biased in it's diversity mission don't you think?
Maybe our legislatures making a statement that all the PC MUST STOP WASTING MY TAX DOLLARS? Looks like good fiscal policy to me!
Only if you're looking for a reason to continue funding the dept. I somehow don't think that's what you want
I was at the game . They occupied the student cheering section and did different chants during the game. Then with ten minutes to go in the game they walked out leaving the student section empty. I thought it was an insult to our bb team and the seniors on senior day. That wasn't the place for a protrst.
Pretty sure none of that happened (including the last part about how they stop wasting tax dollars)
Wait, you're one of those who believe a war on Christmas really exists aren't you?
You just made my point in a "liberal" sort of way! Debating you is not even a challenge! I bet you feel the "Bern." Am I right?
lol:
Your statement is a little unsettling. When you say, "Sexual tendencies", I hope you don't mean meeting and trying to arrange sex with 14 year olds? Or other types of pedophile activity-these are crimes, as they should be. Regarding open ideas, some may argue that if the vast majority of a school's tenured professors belonged to the socialist party, or the Nazi party, or the democrat party, etc. that the state was not providing a open environment-while it wouldn't be a school affiliated with a given religion, it would be one affiliated ( numerically) with a given political party. I'm sure you're 100% opposed to that also. While many parents do not want their children "Sheltered" they also do not want their values, and religion belittled. It's a fine line, when you set yourself up as what is sheltering and what is Ok.
I can easily grasp that concept. Oh, BTW, I'm glad you've dropped the "stupid act" for just on second, and got back on the subject of Budget. The assertion that this budget cutting measure is nothing more than a punitive measure, is not a fact. Without knowing what we are getting for $5,000,000.00/year, it may very well turn out to be a sound financial decision. I've yet to see any figures as to things such as salaries, and costs. Without that info, you're pulling "Punitive measure" out of thin air.
All I know is that I know a fairly recent 2009 Mizzou graduate, and he says that he thinks that the administration put pressure on Pinkel to leave after the protest. I know that Pinkel has non Hodgkins Lymphoma. He coached all season after his diagnosis. It is just a possibility.
I know no one really is happy with the Tennessean so if you dont want to go to to the link i will provide the text:
Kamara, Reeves-Maybin join UT diversity protest
KNOXVILLE University of Tennessee students gathered at the school's men's basketball game Saturday, holding signs in protest of a panel of state lawmakers' movement to take state funding away from the school's diversity office.
Among them were current Tennessee football stars Alvin Kamara and Jalen Reeves-Maybin.