Again, you are trying too hard. At this point, it is likely you are arguing just to avoid admitting you overstated things.
Banks played a lot of snaps. As you stated (contradicting yourself), that both gave him more opportunities and caused him to play tired. You can't have it both ways. Either he sucked and was a top tackler in the SEC just because he played so many snaps or he was pretty productive in spite of playing a lot more snaps than you'd hope.