How many people that signed it really thought it would bring Pearl back?
Here's the funny thing about those saying the petition worked...
Attention:
The Bruce Pearl Petition started on February 12, 2014, on February 22, 2014 the petition already has 20k signatures. You know what also happened that day, the Texas A&M loss.
So if this petition is what caused the turnaround, why did it magically happen AFTER the A&M loss?
People can say what they want but the petition got Martins attention. the Martin we have seen since the A&M loss isn't the same coach we have in the last 3 years. He has fire and shows emotion. If anybody says all the talk about him getting fired and the petition did not have anything to do with it is in denial.
This is all I can think about when I hear Rome's name ... Jim Rome vs. Jim "Chris" Everett - YouTube
The people in denial are those who thought the petition would ever work.
It seems that generally the people who signed the petition wanted a team that was playing with fire, passion, and to their abilities. Perhaps the vitriol was misplaced on Martin, and admittedly it is questionable if the petition had a direct impact on the team's performance, but ultimately those who signed the petition (myself included), got exactly what they wanted (though not what the petition specifically asked for).
And, while I regret signing the thing, the petition itself has added some majesty to the narrative of this Tennessee team as they perform in the tournament. Every announcer gleefully points out that this is the same coach who fans wanted replaced a few months ago. Without that petition, the media story line loses some shine. In a way, the petition has become some of the fuel for the large media narrative surrounding the team currently. Even if you believe the petition had zero effect on the team's performance, it has undoubtedly had some effect on the team's coverage.
tl;dr The media loves the Cinderella or under-dog story, and the Vol fan's discontent via the petition has made Tennessee's story more compelling, fueling even more coverage. Media coverage of this team is warranted and is good for the overall program. Ultimately it could be argued that the petition was good for the program, even if it feels a bit embarrassing for those who signed it (me).
Yes, I have publicly renounced my sins:
http://www.volnation.com/forum/tenn...ake-up-disappointing-season.html#post10013008
well it was first reported by a local station on the 18th.....then the most of the rest of the media(local and national) started reporting on it after the texas A&M game. either way who cares, we are winning and thats all that matters.
well it was first reported by a local station on the 18th.....then the most of the rest of the media(local and national) started reporting on it after the texas A&M game. either way who cares, we are winning and thats all that matters.
I wouldn't worry too much about somebody calling anybody an idiot. After all probably 90% of them signed the petition. The same ones calling people an idiot will be signing their 3rd petition next year if Tn goes 15-15. That's how it works in VN land.
Im still not sold on Martin but that is my opinion.
This. The petition is what started most of the national media heat on CCM. But like you said who cares we are winning now and Idc what caused it. But if it makes you sleep better BTO the petition had 0% to do with the team waking up.
If the petition is why we are winning then why did we lose to A&M when the petition had 20k signatures?
Seems contradictory.
Perhaps the petition was a distraction leading up to the aTm game, which led to poor play in that stretch, and after that game, they had the meeting to decide that things like that petition could no longer affect their on court performance, their focus, and their goal. Maybe they decided to band together in that meeting to make that petition as worthless as the bandwidth it was coded on, and figgt for their coach and their season. That's what senior leaders do.
I'm open to that interpretation too, but you seem to believe it as gospel truth with no evidence that it is in fact true.