Joey's Court Date Set for Feb 10

#2
#2
Since we have little chance of getting anything better than what we already have, I suppose Heupel has no other choice. He's gonna wait on Aguilar and pray for the best. Hey, that's what Spanky does. He's never proactive. Always reactive....after lunch....and a nap.
 
#6
#6
Since we have little chance of getting anything better than what we already have, I suppose Heupel has no other choice. He's gonna wait on Aguilar and pray for the best. Hey, that's what Spanky does. He's never proactive. Always reactive....after lunch....and a nap.

The Vols would be so much further along if only @CAVPUT were in charge
 
#16
#16
Since we have little chance of getting anything better than what we already have, I suppose Heupel has no other choice. He's gonna wait on Aguilar and pray for the best. Hey, that's what Spanky does. He's never proactive. Always reactive....after lunch....and a nap.
Always a day late and a lot of dollars short.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustFunnN'Orange
#18
#18
What's the argument against it? My understanding of it is that there's no reason not to allow Aguilar to play.
My understanding is Pavia’s case was not settled by a court ruling. The ruling judge just gave Pavia an injunction to play until the NCAA took it to court. They never challenged the injunction
he played, but the matter was never settled over the right to play 4 years of Div 1 in addition to JUCO.
 
#21
#21
My understanding is Pavia’s case was not settled by a court ruling. The ruling judge just gave Pavia an injunction to play until the NCAA took it to court. They never challenged the injunction
he played, but the matter was never settled over the right to play 4 years of Div 1 in addition to JUCO.
But, you could say that the effect of the injunction last season was to grant the 4th year, post juco.
 
#24
#24
My understanding is Pavia’s case was not settled by a court ruling. The ruling judge just gave Pavia an injunction to play until the NCAA took it to court. They never challenged the injunction
he played, but the matter was never settled over the right to play 4 years of Div 1 in addition to JUCO.
So if Pavia is to lose the case he should be ruled ineligible for the 2025 season and Vandy should have to vacate all wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40
#25
#25
So if Pavia is to lose the case he should be ruled ineligible for the 2025 season and Vandy should have to vacate all wins.
The NCAA agreed to let Pavia play after the injunction so the lawsuit was declared moot by the court.

 

Advertisement



Back
Top