Jimmie Kimmel Show gone !

And feeding African children that should die of disease or starvation.

If they can't feed and give their children clean drinking water at this point yet continue to reproduce like rabbits not much anyone is going to do to help. You are free to go over there and solve their problems, but let's be honest you ain't solving jack **** and jack left town.
 
Cancel culture allowed his Karl Malone skit because he’s one of them.
I mean you aren't entirely wrong here. He dressed entirely in black face and no one has said anything about it which is odd (not that I think he should have to). Hadn't thought about that skit in a long time.
 
By your standard Kimmel never said Kirk was maga.

I and most would agree he was speaking of all black⁰ women. How does a college dropout qualify to doubt the abilities of college graduates? You believe Barack Obama dei hired Michelle? How about his comment on black female customer service agents?
So by my standard, okay?
Why would most agree that he was speaking of all black women? If you watched the entire dialogue it is very clear that he is speaking of very specific people. I wasn't aware President Obama ever hired Michelle. I don't know enough about her( other than our food taste are way different) to make an intelligent argument either way. I don't know if she was a good lawyer. Best I can tell she is a good wife. It looks like she put his ambitions above her own.

I'm not here to defend everything the man said to you.

If you believe a piece of paper somehow makes you more qualified in every instance we are a long way from agreement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
And Charlie was a devout Christian that loved immagrants as Jesus commanded.
this type of analogy is so comical. If you are using "jesus" to try to prove political points then you don't understand anything about his life. I see people who don't even go to church or call themselves Christian love to make comments on what Jesus would or wouldn't have said about modern day politics. it's ignorant
 
I mean you aren't entirely wrong here. He dressed entirely in black face and no one has said anything about it which is odd (not that I think he should have to). Hadn't thought about that skit in a long time.
A little boy at a Chiefs game a few years back had his face painted black and red and got more national backlash by the left.
 
Last edited:
This what he said, verbatim: "We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” He did not explicitly say Robinson was MAGA. Folks, we are through the looking glass now.

Please explain?
 
Jimmy Kimmel didn't say he was one of them. In not as many words, he said that MAGA members were trying to place Tyler Robinson in every negative affiliation they could .... except their own.

I understand the confusion. He didn't articulate himself well at all. Also, I'm not condoning what he said. It was in poor taste and inappropriate, while the country is so bitterly divided.

I’m sure you’re the first person Jimmy called to tell what he specifically meant.

He saw your brilliant work on how Ashley Biden’s diary was altered.
 
Except for a few rogue politicians, gotta go outside the parties to find the small government folks.
Id prefer small government but that's a pipe dream... Won't happen without a they people taking down government. We are to far gone now
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Another poster alluded to the "hot monologue". Maybe they saw the same thing you did.

The only thing I don't like about this is the unnamed source. Erodes credibility.
Such a source can’t come public. It’s being reported by many sources including left leaning CNN and NY Times so I think that adds to its credibility. They wouldn’t all report it unless they were confident in its veracity
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Such a source can’t come public. It’s being reported by many sources including left leaning CNN and NY Times so I think that adds to its credibility. They wouldn’t all report it unless they were confident in its veracity
Russia hoax
 
Such a source can’t come public. It’s being reported by many sources including left leaning CNN and NY Times so I think that adds to its credibility. They wouldn’t all report it unless they were confident in its veracity
Understood. I already try to have skepticism with 'news'. unnamed sources simply heightens the distrust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
Except for a few rogue politicians, gotta go outside the parties to find the small government folks.
The small government notion is nowhere near a reality. Just look at this administration trying to reduce the size of the federal work force, eliminating departments and the backlash they are facing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
this type of analogy is so comical. If you are using "jesus" to try to prove political points then you don't understand anything about his life. I see people who don't even go to church or call themselves Christian love to make comments on what Jesus would or wouldn't have said about modern day politics. it's ignorant
If you say so. Matthew 25
 
Advertisement

Back
Top