JohnnyJava
Subversive iconoclast
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 1,411
- Likes
- 3,057
This year, Knowles' PSU team was 34th in total defense and 37th in scoring defense. I didn't know anything about him, so I asked Google Gemini for a scheme and results overview which follows:
I. Defensive Philosophy: The "Safety-Driven" 4-2-5
Knowles calls his scheme a "Safety-Driven Defense." While it is technically a 4-2-5 base (4 defensive linemen, 2 linebackers, 5 defensive backs), it functions differently than standard nickel packages.- Aggression & Disguise: Knowles views defense through an "offensive" lens. He wants to dictate the tempo rather than react. His hallmark is disguising coverages—showing one look pre-snap and rotating into a completely different one post-snap to trick the quarterback.
- The Three Safeties: The scheme relies heavily on three safeties on the field simultaneously.
- Bandit/Boundary Safety: Plays into the boundary (short side of the field) and is often involved in run support.
- Field Safety: Covers the wide side of the field.
- Strike/Nickel: A hybrid safety/linebacker who covers the slot but also fits the run aggressively.
- Bandit/Boundary Safety: Plays into the boundary (short side of the field) and is often involved in run support.
- The "Jack" Position: This is a hybrid defensive end/linebacker position (sometimes called a "Leo"). Knowles recruits an athletic pass rusher for this spot who can line up with his hand in the dirt, stand up on the edge, or drop into coverage. This moving piece prevents the offense from predicting where the pressure is coming from.
- "Touching" the Quarterback: Knowles tracks a specific metric called "havoc" or "touching the QB." He emphasizes that even if you don't get the sack, physically hitting or moving the quarterback off his spot is the primary correlation to winning games.
II. Statistical Success & Rankings
Knowles has a distinct track record of "build-up" success. At his previous stops (Duke and Oklahoma State), his defenses often struggled statistically in Year 1 as players learned his complex system, but they improved drastically by Year 3 or 4 to become top-tier units. At Ohio State, however, the turnaround was much faster due to the elite talent available.1. Ohio State (2022–2024)
- The Turnaround: Knowles inherited a defense that ranked #59 in total defense the year prior (2021).
- Results: He produced an immediate turnaround, culminating in one of the nation's best units.
- 2022 (Year 1): Improved to 14th in Total Defense.
- 2023 (Year 2): Ranked 3rd nationally in Total Defense and 2nd in Scoring Defense (11.2 ppg).
- 2024 (Year 3): His unit ranked 1st in the nation in both Scoring Defense and Total Defense.
- 2022 (Year 1): Improved to 14th in Total Defense.
2. Oklahoma State (2018–2021)
- The Build: Inherited a unit ranked in the 90s.
- Results: The defense improved steadily each year, peaking in his final season with historic numbers.
- 2018 (Year 1): 112th in Total Defense (Struggle year).
- 2020 (Year 3): 1st nationally in 3rd Down Defense; led the nation in defensive touchdowns.
- 2021 (Year 4): The defense was elite, ranking #3 in Total Defense and #1 in the nation in Sacks (57).
- 2018 (Year 1): 112th in Total Defense (Struggle year).
3. Duke (2010–2017)
- The Context: Duke was historically a difficult place to play defense due to talent disparities in the ACC.
- Results: Knowles took them from the bottom of the FBS to a respectable, bowl-winning level.
- Early Years: Consistently ranked near 100th.
- 2017 (Final Year): Peaked at 21st nationally in Scoring Defense (20.2 ppg), marking one of the best defenses in Duke history.

