I think our reading comprehension might just be crossing wires, my intent wasn’t to be rude.That's exactly what I said and the point of my post. I never indicated that Sham would play Tackle. If Sanders is inserted, Sham is the one bumped out of the lineup.
"It’s not Sanders or Perry. It’s Sanders or Sham, with Perry moving to Guard"...to replace Sham (although Moe will move to Sham's spot at LG and Perry would play RG).
The question is, do we a) keep things status quo because it's been clicking and there seems to be chemistry or b) do we insert Sanders because it puts our most talented 5 out there and puts Perry at his more natural position?
I'd go with b. We need the most athletic/talented group out there for this UGA defense. But I'd understand going with a.
“It’s Sanders or Sham,…” reads to me as it’s one or the other, especially when followed by “…with Perry moving to Guard.”
But we’re aligned, all good my friend.