butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,929
- Likes
- 224,731
Hypothetical. They definitely would change strategy for Maurer because of his mobility. They would also have to change strategy for Bailey because they knew he would make quicker decisions than JG (probably).I get the crowd that says even if he is starting someone else, he doesn't want to tip his hand to Arky. But even if he came out and announced a new starter, it's not like Arky or anyone would really have any film to really prep for a different QB.
They could announce Bob Kesling is starting at QB and they would have to adjust for quicker decisionsHypothetical. They definitely would change strategy for Maurer because of his mobility. They would also have to change strategy for Bailey because they knew he would make quicker decisions than JG (probably).
Ya know, I think Pruitt knows football. I think he really hates press conferences. And I think he is really frustrated with the fact that what he sees during the week does NOT show up on Saturday. And I don't think he has an answer for it yet.
My guess is bama works on whatever needs the most attention during their bye week. That very well could be fundamentals, who knows.Why do I feel like every year on the bye week Pruitt tells us the team went back to "working on fundamentals". Does Bama work on fundamentals on their bye week? I would think fundamentals are something you teach every day in practice so on the bye week you can set up some things to help you win in the upcoming games.
I hate to pick on you but I hate the "Give Pruitt _ years - He know football" point. You know who else knows football? Every other coach in the SEC. Pruitt doesn't know football anymore than Saban, Stoops, Smart, Mullen, Jimbo, etc. There's a lot more to being a SEC coach than "knowing football." You have to set culture, make adjustments, have team prepared, make great hires, etc.
Can't make plays or score points on offense if you turn the ball over. Also, teams that have a negative turnover ratio, generally lose... You can actually do both, not turn the ball over and score points..."The first thing for us is don't turn the ball over. "
This explains the crappy offensive game plans. Now, while I don't deny that turnovers can make a huge difference, surely, scoring points is the "first thing". "Make plays" HAS to be more of a priority than "don't turn it over." With that thinking, the best offense in the country last year was Oregon State, who was 5-7 and 47th in the country in scoring, but only had 6 turnovers.
You just can't play that way and expect wins.
He gave short, generic answers and quickly moved on.. I'm not bashing him at all and I don't blame him for not going into detail.When? I skimmed through it, but from what I listened to... He got asked indirect questions about QBs and gave indirect answers.
No one had the kahunas to just ask him "Is the starting QB spot up in the air this week?" unless I just missed it.
No offense to you or fingers, but there's not enough in those short clips to be able to tell anything about players or the team.One thing I have noticed this year in the practice videos that Fingers posts Is a noticeable lack of “nasty” in how the players practice. It troubles to see that. If there is no intensity in your practice effort against your teammates, then there will be less intensity than need be against your opponent on game day.
I think one reason that the whole of UT football is less than the sum of its individual parts is a general lack of aggressiveness anytime they step on the field.
Or really any need to, because 1st mistake of any kind and #2 is back!I get the crowd that says even if he is starting someone else, he doesn't want to tip his hand to Arky. But even if he came out and announced a new starter, it's not like Arky or anyone would really have any film to really prep for a different QB.
"The first thing for us is don't turn the ball over. "
This explains the crappy offensive game plans. Now, while I don't deny that turnovers can make a huge difference, surely, scoring points is the "first thing". "Make plays" HAS to be more of a priority than "don't turn it over." With that thinking, the best offense in the country last year was Oregon State, who was 5-7 and 47th in the country in scoring, but only had 6 turnovers.
You just can't play that way and expect wins.
Can't make plays or score points on offense if you turn the ball over. Also, teams that have a negative turnover ratio, generally lose... You can actually do both, not turn the ball over and score points...
I hate to pick on you but I hate the "Give Pruitt _ years - He know football" point. You know who else knows football? Every other coach in the SEC. Pruitt doesn't know football anymore than Saban, Stoops, Smart, Mullen, Jimbo, etc. There's a lot more to being a SEC coach than "knowing football." You have to set culture, make adjustments, have team prepared, make great hires, etc.
From your response, I'm not sure you actually read my post; but I'll play along for the moment...Can't make plays or score points on offense if you turn the ball over. Also, teams that have a negative turnover ratio, generally lose... You can actually do both, not turn the ball over and score points...
I don't necessarily think Pruitt's first rule of offense is 'not to turn the ball over'.. I think he sees turnovers as, presently, a huge issue that needs to be dealt with immediately. When you have more than one issue, you have to prioritize which to fix the 'firstest' and the fastest. This offense has more than one major issue some can be fixed quickly, others take more time i.e. QBFrom your response, I'm not sure you actually read my post; but I'll play along for the moment...
You can't make plays or score points on offense if your FIRST THING (which is what Pruitt said) is trying not to turn the ball over. Trying to make plays, while also trying not to do anything stupid is quite a bit different from not trying to make plays BECAUSE it could lead to something stupid. (The latter being what we have been doing.)