OrangeBeachVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,982
- Likes
- 6,401
I liked Dooley. He did a good job with Mizzou after his stint with the Cowboys. And look who took his place after he left Mizzou. Thanks Dooley!
They both inherited a dumpster fire. Dooley, however was a worse coach in my opinion. He had a loaded offensive roster and coached them to a losing record. In fact, he never had a winning record at UT. Including 2 late game losses in 2010. I wont completely blame him for the bowl game against UNC, but that decision against LSU that cost them the game was atrocious. He had the worst record at UT since the early 1900's that had coached more than 2 seasons. Plus, he was an asshat. Including to his players from what I remember being reported.I am looking at everything. Dooley came in after the Kiffin one year fiasco, a total dumpster fire.
Pruitt came in after Butch Jones landed a few of arguably what were Tennessee's best classes ever and gave us a sense of some kind of stability for the first time since Fulmer.
If a new coach flames out from the beginning, you can almost always point to his last year to see what he was really capable of. Not to mention he cheated as well to be that bad and pur roster talent rankings were pretty damn high while he was here.
I hate you.View attachment 447043
View attachment 447044
The more things change, the more they remain the same…
Dooley would have done so much better if he would have been able to count to 11. IMHOPruitt is one of the worst coaches in modern SEC history. He is an unlikeable person, ran a boring offense, had no morals, and was a cheater. Overall, he was a horrible HC and a horrible human being. But a quick glimpse of SEC records just shows how much worse Dooley was as a coach.
Comparing Pruitt and Dooley to Brussels and spinach(which are both f’n great) is an insult to brussels and spinach.Arguing which is worse between Pruitt and Dooley is kinda like little kids arguing which is worse between brussels sprouts and spinach.
They both suck. That's really all that's gotta be said.
Folk are probably being a little bit hard on Pruitt.
Think of it like someone leading a military. Pruitt was very good at capitalizing on having the more powerful army. If he had the stronger force, he could get the most out of his stronger force, he proved that at his previous stops. He could use his stronger force to exploit your weaknesses.
Now what he couldn’t do, is take the weaker force and make them play like the stronger force. If he was outmatched he had no shot. That wasn’t what 4-8 Tennessee needed.
So far, Heupel seems to be what we need. If he has the stronger force, he will absolutely march all over you. If he has the weaker force, he will, at the very least, make you feel the punches of the weaker force. Usually he can make a good fight against your stronger force.