lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 75,365
- Likes
- 44,677

Lmao, they took the Trump pic out of the files (not redacted, removed) for "victim protection" with zero victims in it. Yeah OK![]()
DOJ restores Trump photo to Epstein files after determining no victims depicted
DOJ briefly removed photo of President Trump from latest release of Jeffrey Epstein–related files, citing victim protection concerns before reposting after review.www.foxnews.com
Imagine defending this BS evidence release and pretending the admin complied with the law.
I got called a pedo apologist by multiple VN posters for letting everyone know that Tim Ballard was a fraud. Where are those guys now when there are real pedo apologists about?
You can lmao all you want but it was the same damn Trump pic that your guys attach to every article about Epstein, nothing new. The only new thing was the pic was photographed in a drawer with other pics of people that could have been victims. Another false alarm.Lmao, they took the Trump pic out of the files (not redacted, removed) for "victim protection" with zero victims in it. Yeah OK
wasn't he arrested for tax evasion? or some other financial crime? and then the sex trafficking came out later?If Epstein was involved in some protected deep state racket, then how was he arrested?
Is there any victim claim that didnt get pursued, if so, that is a DOJ issue, not a Trump coverup.
If Trump was implicated, why was it not pursued by a DOJ that wanted him at all costs?
Sorry, but if you are holding out hope that there is proof Trump did something illegal, you are going to be sorely disappointed.
Jmo, but hey keep dreaming.
Literally zero claims of or evidence of actual pedophilia involving Epstein.
That's the real question isn't it? All I know is they all talked a really big game until they got a look and then decided it wasn't worth the squeeze. Bongino even claimed that he would expose the truth that Epstein was a foreign agent then seemed to forget all about it when given the platform.if this is the case, why do you think they are? Who do you think they’re trying to protect?
This is a sect of society that is very confusing to me. Farmer took nude photos of her sisters who were 12 and 16 and those were allegedly stolen by Epstein. Admittedly there is a lot of "art" I don't understand, but nude photos of teen and pre teen girls doesn't seem a good idea.![]()
Art dealer told FBI about Epstein's child porn affinity in 1996
Maria Farmer has long asserted that she filed a complaint against the sex offender in 1996. On Friday, the FBI finally released a copy of the document.www.dailymail.co.uk
SO the Clinton FBI ignored this ladies claim?This is a sect of society that is very confusing to me. Farmer took nude photos of her sisters who were 12 and 16 and those were allegedly stolen by Epstein. Admittedly there is a lot of "art" I don't understand, but nude photos of teen and pre teen girls doesn't seem a good idea.
It is also disturbing that there are sects in many societies who openly pursue children for gratification.
This is a sect of society that is very confusing to me. Farmer took nude photos of her sisters who were 12 and 16 and those were allegedly stolen by Epstein. Admittedly there is a lot of "art" I don't understand, but nude photos of teen and pre teen girls doesn't seem a good idea.
It is also disturbing that there are sects in many societies who openly pursue children for gratification.
An odd reply.A reference photo for anatomy art wasn't child porn until Epstein stole, it and started passing it around to his pedophile friends, the same way some Polaroid of a fully naked kid in the bath from 1988 isn't child porn when the parents took it, but is when it ends up scanned into the collection of a child porn collector when they go on trial in 2025.
Now we’re asking the real questions!Where were the MOTHERS and FATHERS of all of the under age girls that went to spend time with Epstein and the other grown men?
So wait you blaming Trump for something you have no evidence he was involved in, yet when the parents who in the court documents basically sold their kids to Epstien and Maxwell are asked to be a accountable your response is but Trump... patheticNow we’re asking the real questions!
We all know it wasn’t the fault of the old rich men who were ****ing the underage girls. It was their parents!
I mean seriously, you’re a 50 year old man at a party with a 14 or 15 year old girl, what are you supposed to do? Not have sex with her?! How ridiculous is that? If her parents don’t come stop you, is it really even your responsibility?
Trump didn’t father any of these girls so clearly he’s blameless.
I just said he was blameless! I even said “clearly he’s blameless.”So wait you blaming Trump for something you have no evidence he was involved in, yet when the parents who in the court documents basically sold their kids to Epstien and Maxwell are asked to be a accountable your response is but Trump... pathetic
Im saying you have no proof of Trump involvement yet you can't hold anyone else responsible for the disgusting acts....but Trump your mentally ill.I just said he was blameless!
Are you suggesting there would be something wrong with banging underage girls whose parents weren’t there to stop it? What kind of monster are you?
So if that's how you feel which I doubt...your obviously being factitious. Why are you bring up Trump in a post about the parents..?? I always thought you were above TDS but clearly you headed down that lane...your becoming ELExactly! Until we know where the truly responsible parties - the parents (obviously) - were, we can’t begin to hold people responsible.
Tangent to the squabble....did yall know Steven Tyler of Aerosmith was granted guardianship of a 16 year old so she could be on tour with him? Happened years ago but it's still incredibly creepy and Criminal by our standards today.Exactly! Until we know where the truly responsible parties - the parents (obviously) - were, we can’t begin to hold people responsible.
