Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#5,001
#5,001
www.breitbart.com

Clintons, Comey, Garland, Mueller Ordered to Testify in Epstein Probe

James Comer has issued subpoenas to some of the most powerful political figures of the past three decades in the Epstein probe.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

  • Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr (August 18)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (August 26)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions (August 28)
  • Former FBI Director Robert Mueller (September 2)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch (September 9)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (September 30)
  • Attorney General Merrick Garland (October 2)
  • Former FBI Director James Comey (October 7)
  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (October 9)
  • Former President Bill Clinton (October 14)
Chances all of them defy the subpoenas?
 
#5,002
#5,002
rekinhavoc said:
www.breitbart.com

Clintons, Comey, Garland, Mueller Ordered to Testify in Epstein Probe

James Comer has issued subpoenas to some of the most powerful political figures of the past three decades in the Epstein probe.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

  • Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr (August 18)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (August 26)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions (August 28)
  • Former FBI Director Robert Mueller (September 2)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch (September 9)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (September 30)
  • Attorney General Merrick Garland (October 2)
  • Former FBI Director James Comey (October 7)
  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (October 9)
  • Former President Bill Clinton (October 14)
Chances all of them defy the subpoenas?
Click to expand...
I'm no attorney, but golly, there seems to be one obvious name missing from that subpoena list. Now whom might that be. Hmmm 🤔

1000000240.jpg
 
#5,003
#5,003
rekinhavoc said:
www.breitbart.com

Clintons, Comey, Garland, Mueller Ordered to Testify in Epstein Probe

James Comer has issued subpoenas to some of the most powerful political figures of the past three decades in the Epstein probe.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

  • Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr (August 18)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (August 26)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions (August 28)
  • Former FBI Director Robert Mueller (September 2)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch (September 9)
  • Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (September 30)
  • Attorney General Merrick Garland (October 2)
  • Former FBI Director James Comey (October 7)
  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (October 9)
  • Former President Bill Clinton (October 14)
Chances all of them defy the subpoenas?
Click to expand...

That's what MAGA wants. Distraction.

Won't work.
 
#5,006
#5,006
Literally have Congressional probes of people that Trump has associated with, enemies, former FBI Directors who has seen the files, and his former AG, yet it is a distraction…people that would have dirt on Trump and Dems may even bring him up..

Nothing will satisfy some..but whatever.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Firebirdparts and whodeycin85
#5,008
#5,008
Orangeburst said:
Literally have Congressional probes of people that Trump has associated with, enemies, former FBI Directors who has seen the files, and his former AG, yet it is a distraction…people that would have dirt on Trump and Dems may even bring him up..

Nothing will satisfy some..but whatever..keep being stupid.
Click to expand...
That really the truth of it.... Right now there are more people associated with Epstein who have said Trump didn't do anything wrong regarding young girls.... But they will never believe that no matter what evidence there is
 
#5,009
#5,009
whodeycin85 said:
That really the truth of it.... Right now there are more people associated with Epstein who have said Trump didn't do anything wrong regarding young girls.... But they will never believe that no matter what evidence there is
Click to expand...


Then why have Trump et al reversed their plan to release it (after Trump was told by Bondi that he's in there)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#5,011
#5,011
lawgator1 said:
The grand jury release is 1/1000th of the whole. Maybe less. Its another distraction, it wouldn't answer the question of what is in there about Trump.
Click to expand...
You've just betrayed yourself. You don't care what's in there, only what you feel may hurt Trump.

That's essentially what you just said. I've tried giving to the benefit of the doubt for years but it's hard to take you seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#5,012
#5,012
lawgator1 said:
That's what MAGA wants. Distraction.

Won't work.
Click to expand...
I think mentally you're having a problem here. Nobody would be fooled by your post. You should be thrilled to see this, although a big question is whether anybody is going to tell the truth at all. They'll only tell the truth if they absolutely have to.
 
#5,013
#5,013
Firebirdparts said:
I think mentally you're having a problem here. You should be thrilled to see this, although a big question is whether anybody is going to tell the truth at all. They'll only tell the truth if they absolutely have to.
Click to expand...


That's why we need to see the documents and what people had to say long before Trump was President. Everything now is tainted by "what's in it for me?" see e.g. Maxwell.
 
#5,015
#5,015
nothing there as Trump said

Byron York
@ByronYork
·
3h


Judge reads Maxwell-Epstein grand jury transcripts. Writes: "The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes. They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death. They do not reveal the path of the government's investigation." https://washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/3497997/ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-no-there-there-judge/
 
#5,016
#5,016
jmacvols1 said:
nothing there as Trump said

Byron York
@ByronYork
·
3h


Judge reads Maxwell-Epstein grand jury transcripts. Writes: "The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes. They do not reveal new venues at which their crimes occurred. They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death. They do not reveal the path of the government's investigation." https://washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/3497997/ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-no-there-there-judge/
Click to expand...

If there’s nothing there, WHY NOT RELEASE IT?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh and rekinhavoc
#5,020
#5,020
BernardKingGOAT said:
I saw an interview with Epstein where he pleaded the 5th when asked if he and Trump had relations with underage girls. Maxwell? Zero credibility. Guthrie? She said she had no knowledge of it. None of them have actually said what you claim
Click to expand...
Why wouldn't he plead the 5th there? That's hardly indicative that Trump did any wrong.
 
#5,024
#5,024
MontyPython said:
If there’s nothing there, WHY NOT RELEASE IT?
Click to expand...
Redact the victim's names, don't release child pornography, and expose any butthole that knowingly had sex with a minor.

This is not rocket science. If you're innocent you got nothing to worry about. They know what was social and what was sick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbh, MontyPython and whodeycin85
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top