Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#4,976
#4,976
lawgator1 said:
It is entirely possible that the Biden administration sat on the files to protect prominent Dems or Dem donors and if so they deserve just as much criticism as does the current administration for doing so.

But right now, the only people who control this at the end of the day are Trump and Bondi, maybe Patel. And to me both Bondi and Patel of late have looked like deer caught in headlights on this.
Click to expand...
So you are suggesting that Biden and his administration was willing to protect prominent democrats or democrat donor pedo's ? Your reaching counselor.
 
#4,978
#4,978
whodeycin85 said:
Link??

I asked grok;
Has Donald Trump directed Pam Bondi to not release the Epstein files? Or is the Trump doj actively blocking any requests to release the files?

Response: No, there is no substantiated evidence that Donald Trump has directly instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to withhold or not release the Epstein files. In fact, multiple reports indicate the opposite: Trump publicly ordered Bondi in July 2025 to seek the release of grand jury testimony and related documents from Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking investigations.

Seems to suggest the opposite
Click to expand...


If he ordered her to do it, why hasn't she?
 
#4,979
#4,979
BernardKingGOAT said:
I saw an interview with Epstein where he pleaded the 5th when asked if he and Trump had relations with underage girls. Maxwell? Zero credibility. Guthrie? She said she had no knowledge of it. None of them have actually said what you claim
Click to expand...
He pleased the 5th because anything he said involving young girls is incriminating..whether he said that they both did or just he did. Guthrie said she never says Trump doing anything with young girls. Maxwell apparently has said the same....
Ask yourself this...your going down for child sex trafficking, you have a chance to dish dirt on Trump and yet you don't??? Why when that get you a better deal or perhaps even immunity???
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonofUT62
#4,980
#4,980
lawgator1 said:
If he ordered her to do it, why hasn't she?
Click to expand...
Do you have a link saying he is actively blocking it or not?? Cuz right now your FOS.. and it being blocked by several Dem judges who I have already proven have the discretion to release files. So 1 side is still blocking (yours) and the GOP is stalling..idly they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc
#4,981
#4,981
whodeycin85 said:
He pleased the 5th because anything he said involving young girls is incriminating..whether he said that they both did or just he did. Guthrie said she never says Trump doing anything with young girls. Maxwell apparently has said the same....
Ask yourself this...your going down for child sex trafficking, you have a chance to dish dirt on Trump and yet you don't??? Why when that get you a better deal or perhaps even immunity???
Click to expand...
That's a hypothetical I can't honestly answer, having never faced anything remotely similar. Honestly, I couldn't give 2 shats whether they release it or not. It's funny how the story changes so often from the Donald. Even funnier are the clowns who constantly defend this idiot con man
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
#4,982
#4,982
BernardKingGOAT said:
That's a hypothetical I can't honestly answer, having never faced anything remotely similar. Honestly, I couldn't give 2 shats whether they release it or not. It's funny how the story changes so often from the Donald. Even funnier are the clowns who constantly defend this idiot con man
Click to expand...
His changing story is him being an idiot and probably the fact he is old AF and probably having spells...but you can apply that hypothetical to any situation where you have dirt of someone higher then you to get yourself outta trouble....unless your an old school gangster type..everyone deals when they have dirt of someone else above them. So why wouldnt Epstein if there was dirt on Trump??
 
#4,983
#4,983
whodeycin85 said:
His changing story is him being an idiot and probably the fact he is old AF and probably having spells...but you can apply that hypothetical to any situation where you have dirt of someone higher then you to get yourself outta trouble....unless your an old school gangster type..everyone deals when they have dirt of someone else above them. So why wouldnt Epstein if there was dirt on Trump??
Click to expand...
Epstein is dead.

You should be embarrassed at yourself for the effort you put forth defending everything Trump. I know you're not though, so it just becomes a 🍿 moment everyone else not riding that train
 
#4,987
#4,987
rekinhavoc said:
This could be a treasure trove of dirt on both parties. It could destroy or degrade the public's trust in our government.


P.S. No I couldn't keep a straight face typing the last sentence.
Click to expand...
The problem is that the general public DOES trust the .gov. How else could you have gotten millions to take an experimental 'vaccine'?
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#4,988
#4,988
lawgator1 said:
Dismiss it all you want. Trump's denials increasingly ring hollow and inauthentic.

Today, in the Oval Office, he cursed for effect, trying to deny it again. Yet he keeps changing his tune. His story evolves and transforms. Bondi says there's a treasure trove of info, Patel and she promise its going to be released ...

Now? Nope. It makes no sense. Trump is in there. He's lying over and over when he denies it.
Click to expand...
How's that "independent" thing working out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonofUT62
#4,995
#4,995
lawgator1 said:
I have said countless times that if powerful Dems are in there, such as Clinton, disclose it. There are no sacred cows here.
Click to expand...

Is Clinton powerful at this point? He looks like he’s been dead for a month and no one told him. It’s telling that you’re willing to sacrifice someone who hasn’t had a job in 25 years to get the sitting POTUS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#4,996
#4,996
sonofUT62 said:
Is Clinton powerful at this point? He looks like he’s been dead for a month and no one told him. It’s telling that you’re willing to sacrifice someone who hasn’t had a job in 25 years to get the sitting POTUS.
Click to expand...


You are right in the sense that if this leads to the downfall of Trump I'm all for it. I'll even volunteer to stand by the copier and collate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#5,000
#5,000
sonofUT62 said:
What would you sacrifice,if it got every guilty person involved but Trump wasn’t one of them???
Click to expand...

sonofUT62 said:
Feel free to rephrase the question to your liking. I’m not trying to get ya. I actually appreciate your candor in your previous response.
Click to expand...


If others are shown to be involved then prosecutors ought to consider charging them, if possible. There may be statute of limitations issues, of course.

But in the end, given how this has evolved, I really struggle to believe that Trump isn't in there in some significant way. Nothing else makes sense.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top