Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#4,603
#4,603
lawgator1 said:
They've fallen in line and done what Trump wants. Up until now. But they know now that the boom is about to fall and they are starting to seek cover.


Know who has been totally MIA for all of this ? Vance. He's totally disappeared.
Click to expand...
Well, back to the drawing board for you.

 
#4,607
#4,607
dalton_vol said:
He could be in the files, but did he do what Clinton and gates did. I would not be surprised if he was named because he knew him for years. I don't think he did anything inappropriate, it would have already come out.
Click to expand...

Its insane to me that you think Trump wouldn't have sex with an attractive 17 year old girl if she were to come onto him? Remember Epstein wasn't passing off 12 or 13 year old girls to his clients. Virginia Giuffre was 17 years old when she had sex with Prince Andrew. 17 is the age of consent in most jurisdictions here in America and the rest of the world.

And the whole it would have come out thing depends on the idea the Democrats and Republicans are actually at odds and not working for the same bosses. If intelligence agencies were running Epstein it would make sense why Trump's name wouldn't come up cause it would be valuable to use that information for blackmail than anything else. Why do you think Epstein would have kept all those recordings? It wasn't to out the people doing the crimes but to use it as leverage to get what his handlers wanted once the person got in power. And by the way given Trump's recent behavior surrounding the Epstein files doesn't that make more sense. He's been acting like a guy whose being blackmailed to hide something.
 
#4,610
#4,610
K-town Vol Fan said:
You aren't helping the "party of covering for pedos" label
Click to expand...
Biden had 4 years to bring this out while they were trying to prosecute Trump for everything imaginable.
Either Trump isn’t in there (doubtful) or the Democrats are in worse shape than the republicans if this gets out (most likely)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, FLVOL_79, Orangeburst and 5 others
#4,613
#4,613
Orangeslice13 said:
Biden had 4 years to bring this out while they were trying to prosecute Trump for everything imaginable.
Either Trump isn’t in there (doubtful) or the Democrats are in worse shape than the republicans if this gets out (most likely)
Click to expand...
The party that wanted to bring Trump down is somehow pocketing his “connection” to Epstein file. Or he’s not on it in the capacity liberals dream of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#4,622
#4,622
volfanhill said:
It has to do with your claim that Vance was AWOL. Why do you expect us to keep up with your nonsense?
Click to expand...




To be absolutely clear:


This is Vance before the election:


“Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring?” Vance wrote in 2021 on X. “And then that guy died mysteriously in jail? And now we just don’t talk about it.”


“What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein’s clients secret? Oh…,” he wrote on X in 2021, before doubling down in another post: “If you’re a journalist and you’re not asking questions about this case you should be ashamed of yourself.”

________________________________________


This is Vance less than an hour ago:

"First of all, the president has been very clear. We're not shielding anything," Vance said. "The president has directed the attorney general to release all credible information and, frankly, to go and find additional credible information related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. He's been incredibly transparent about that stuff, but some of that stuff takes time."
Click to expand...

abcnews.go.com

'We're not shielding anything,' Vance says of Epstein files

Vance said Trump has "been incredibly transparent."
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com








Do you see the difference? Do you see the adoption of the qualifier, "additional credible"? Can you even admit that this is a gimmick to excuse not doing what he ran on? This is not defensible, pure and simple.
 
#4,623
#4,623
I know Republicans who are going nuts over the Russia hoax investigation who have told me the Epstein thing is a distraction.

To be clear, the Russia hoax is about dirty politics and corruption, where the victim is a (we now know dirty) right-wing politician and the perpetrators are left-wingers....and nothing actually happened to him. He won and held power.

The Epstein case victims are minors who were sex trafficked and had their innocence stolen, and we have God knows how many layers of bipartisan corruption surrounding it.

I can't imagine having a worse order of priorities.

The Clintons have been the white whale of Republicans for 30 years. This could be the smoking gun. But nah. It's a distraction.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top