midnight orange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,147
- Likes
- 3,796
Thanks for the timeline excuse. We are discussing Epstein which you’ve somehow found out about just recently. Although it’s been around for 3 decades at least.
Okay. I didn't realize you were talking about Epstein.![]()
Resurfaced clip shows Epstein pleading the Fifth when asked about Trump
The Trump administration is facing growing pressure to release more information on Jeffrey Epsteinwww.independent.co.uk
- Elon Musk - Mr Trump's former 'First Buddy', who ignited the crisis by claiming that the Epstein files are being withheld because the President is in them - is sensationally named in the documents, along with his brother Kimbal;
- Maxwell was granted 'limited immunity' for her cooperation, which included revealing what she knows about a host of other men, including former President Bill Clinton, Microsoft founder Bill Gates and powerful Wall Street titans;
On Saturday night, a source familiar with this week's meeting said: 'Ghislaine has never told her story to anyone in government before.
- Mr Blanche will meet with Mr Trump after the President's five-day visit to Scotland to discuss a pardon or commuting Maxwell's sentence in return for her help prosecuting others involved in Epstein's sex-trafficking ring.
'At times it was very emotional but she answered every question asked of her.
View attachment 758737
View attachment 758738
Musk's brother Kimbal also appeared in the documents
'She was asked about a laundry list of people including Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Les Wexner, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Leon Black and a Who's Who of powerful Wall Street moneymen and financiers.
'There were Silicon Valley names in there along with world leaders, other non-British royals aside from Andrew and famous names from the world of showbusiness.
Maxwell's latest plea to have her appeal heard before the US Supreme Court will be submitted tomorrow and she has been called to testify before a Congressional committee on August 11.
The MoS understands that if a deal has not been reached by this date she may have to plead the Fifth Amendment, which means she will invoke her constitutional right not to answer any questions which might incriminate her.
The source said: 'Of course she wants a pardon, what prisoner doesn't? But that isn't something which has been discussed.
Maxwell sat on one side of a long polished wooden conference table with her lawyers David Oscar Markus, Leah Saffian and Melissa Madrigal.
Opposite her sat the team for the Government, including Mr Blanche, Associate Deputy Attorney General Diego Pestana and FBI agent Spencer Horn.
An armed US Marshal stood guard at the door because Mr Blanche, the lawyers and Maxwell have all received death threats. 'The number of death threats have increased exponentially since this case has been back in the headlines in the past couple of weeks,' the source said. 'Everyone is getting them.'
![]()
The 100 'big names' Ghislaine Maxwell was quizzed amid Musk bombshell
Andrew has always vehemently denied claims by Virginia Giuffre that she was sex-trafficked to him by Epstein when she was just 17.www.dailymail.co.uk
The actual quote...
"But all of those Epstein girls were not helpless little children raped by adult men. They were/are looking to get paid."
I never saw this post...nor do I need to.
If you think underage kids having any type of sex with grown men is OK, you have a problem and need to get help. Also, you shouldn't be around minors. Ever.
Any and every politician, CEO, bureaucrat, Judge, Cop, or any other profession of adult...whether male or female...shown to be sexually abusing a minor in ANY actual evidence from the Epstein stuff or ANY other credible investigation needs the book thrown at them. Hard time in prison, placed permanently on the sex offender registry so others know where they live and can choose wisely where to rent/buy and what constraints and safety measures to use pertaining to their children.
There should be zero tolerance of abusing kids. That shouldn't even need to be stated. The Democrat party needs to do some housecleaning and get rid of the degenerates who want to rebrand child molesters as "Minor Attracted Persons" or " MAPs". As long as your party embraces those sick people any attempt to point fingers at anyone else is ridiculous on its face.
Do you think there is anything as daMning about Trump in the Epstein Files/Evidence as a diary entry by his daughter admitting that she's been hyper sexualised since childhood ......... and that she got to the point that she was terrified to take a shower when her dad was home because he kept hopping in the shower with her?Who knows what will come out
There are scenarios where I could let it go. But just seems unlikely
Why are you comparing the two? Doesn't matter. It's all problematic. Well Biden is a lazy argumentDo you think there is anything as daMning about Trump in the Epstein Files/Evidence as a diary entry by his daughter admitting that she's been hyper sexualised since childhood ......... and that she got to the point that she was terrified to take a shower when her dad was home because he kept hopping in the shower with her?
I've already stated in this thread I have no sympathy for Trump. He could have addressed Epstein his first term. Aside from Trump's comments about the Epstein list over the ensuing years leading up to and through the 2024 campaign, his staff and administration went all in making bodacious statements about releasing the list. Trump should have kept his house in order if he wasn't willing to address it.
There's only a couple of people on this forum carrying water for Trump about Epstein. Metaphorically speaking, I want Trump to be the first one off the roof if we don't get disclosure. It's not a distraction when we call out dems, too.
I lack the gift of succinct expression.Why are you comparing the two? Doesn't matter. It's all problematic. Well Biden is a lazy argument
My point was in relation to why, now being in power again, it affects LG's suspicion of Trump having participated.Listen, if Dems are in there, agree. Fry them.
But they are out of power. Trump is in power. Honestly, right now, the way he has acted, I'm very suspicious of Trump.
The republicans have never been in power, they might have a majority, but they’ve never (in my lifetime) been unified like Nancy has the Dems to say they are in power.Listen, if Dems are in there, agree. Fry them.
But they are out of power. Trump is in power. Honestly, right now, the way he has acted, I'm very suspicious of Trump.
Agreed.The republicans have never been in power, they might have a majority, but they’ve never (in my lifetime) been unified like Nancy has the Dems to say they are in power.
Newt had them close, but can you name a time they were in lock step the way the Dems have been for the last several years.
The republicans have never been in power, they might have a majority, but they’ve never (in my lifetime) been unified like Nancy has the Dems to say they are in power.
Newt had them close, but can you name a time they were in lock step the way the Dems have been for the last several years.