Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#3,976
#3,976
Septic said:
Imagine being on the side of defending the protection of a file that could expose pedos.

It does fascinate me how someone can so consistently be on the wrong side of an argument. You're the real enigma.
Click to expand...

The women in the criminal trial named no one other than Epstein. Pedos is categorically incorrect. You’ve developed this absurd Alex Jones fantasy in your mind of scientists and politicians banging middle schoolers on an island without anything to back it up.

But what specific file are you asking for? They’ve already released more than was available under the previous admin, yet you cast your blame at them?

Regardless of what’s released you aren’t going to get Netanyahu and Bill Nye tag teaming 12 year olds in the Bahamas. And then you’re going to continue claiming “there’s more! Release the list”
 
#3,978
#3,978
Septic said:
"He likes them young" - Donny J Trump


He knew it.

We know it.

You know it.
Click to expand...

If you see a man with a 20 year old on his arm, that doesn’t mean you know he’s into 16 year olds too. That’s a stretch.

If Trump knew, he wouldn’t have kicked Epstein out over hitting on underage girls
 
#3,979
#3,979
jmacvols1 said:
" In November 2016, Trump himself indicated a shift, telling The New York Times that prosecuting Clinton was "not something I feel very strongly about" and that he wanted to move forward to unite the country."

Trump wanted to unite the country and move ahead and not bog everything down with (fake) lawsuits like the left did with Trump. If Trump, or any President if they wanted to, could convict just about every member of Congress for crimes. so why don't they? It's retailatory.

The DOJ is supposed to non-political and independent. If Trump used the DOJ the left would accuse him of using the DOJ for personal political vindication against Hilliary, abuse of power.
Click to expand...
Things Trump accused Hillary of

Mishandling of Classified Information

Obstruction of Justice

using her position as Secretary of State for personal profit with schemes where foreign entities donated to the Clinton Foundation

Allowing Russia to get uranium reserves as payback for Clinton Foundation donations

offering a "bribe" to Attorney General Loretta Lynch by suggesting Lynch might stay on after the Obama administration.

Claiming foreign governments that made payments to the Clinton Foundation and hired former President Bill Clinton to give speeches received favorable treatment from the State Department
 
#3,980
#3,980
Vol8188 said:
It’s his birthday. He’s saying he hasn’t aged.
Click to expand...
Hmmm... Perhaps. But calling a friend an "enigma"? Who does that. What was so puzzling about Epstein to Donald? Does this not strike you as code?

And the final sentence referencing "may every day be another wonderful secret"... WTF is that all about?

Again... Written within a naked girl outline w Trump's signature on her crotch and sent to a convicted pedophile.

Do tell...
 
Last edited:
#3,982
#3,982
Dobbs 4 Heisman said:
Where did I say Trump raped kids? All I said was he probably knew what Epstein was doing. Like probably most of the elites in their circles. If this Epstein situation proves anything is child sex rackets seem to be par for the course for the elites given how badly they are trying to protect against releasing the Epstein files.

If Trump was totally innocent wouldn't he want to release the files?
Click to expand...
You do know Trump is the only elite to help with the initial case correct,??
 
#3,983
#3,983
Vol8188 said:
If you see a man with a 20 year old on his arm, that doesn’t mean you know he’s into 16 year olds too. That’s a stretch.

If Trump knew, he wouldn’t have kicked Epstein out over hitting on underage girls
Click to expand...
This precise event apparently happened when Epstein hit on an underage daughter of a Mar a Lago member.
 
#3,984
#3,984
MontyPython said:
Hmmm... Perhaps. But calling a friend and "enigma"? Who does that. What was so puzzling about Epstein to Donald? Does this not strike you as code?

And the final sentence referencing "may every day be another wonderful secret"... WTF is that all about?

Again... Written within a naked girl outline w Trump's signature on her crotch written to a convicted pedophile.

Do tell...
Click to expand...

As far as “who does that?”, probably not Donald Trump. No, I don’t think it’s some weird code.

Everything I can’t fully understand or explain in life isn’t a pedophile conspiracy.
 
#3,985
#3,985
Septic said:
Imagine being on the side of defending the protection of a file that could expose pedos.

It does fascinate me how someone can so consistently be on the wrong side of an argument. You're the real enigma.
Click to expand...
then by your own admission you have Biden and the Dems protecting pedos for they had the same information for 4 long years and did NOTHING AT ALL that could have exposed pedos.

Truth is, you're just not as clever as you think you are.
 
#3,986
#3,986
Vol8188 said:
That’s what it is. I just can’t think independently. It has nothing to do with you overplaying your hand
Click to expand...

Glad you attempted this, and here's why:

If I'm wrong, I can say "well, I thought I connected the dots on calling something that waddles, quacks, and lays eggs a duck but I missed the mark. It was just a cringey, creepy mallard."

If you're wrong, all you can say is "I asserted that someone with a, at best, dubious legal history involving sexual harassment/rape, someone who has been quoted saying some pretty problematic sh*t about women, underage girls, his daughter (all separate occasions), and someone who cavorted with founder of a sex trafficking ring, did NOT have amything to do with said organization... and I was wrong."

I will applaud you louder than anyone else should that day come, my dude.
 
#3,989
#3,989
DinkinFlicka said:
Glad you attempted this, and here's why:

If I'm wrong, I can say "well, I thought I connected the dots on calling something that waddles, quacks, and lays eggs a duck but I missed the mark. It was just a cringey, creepy mallard."

If you're wrong, all you can say is "I asserted that someone with a, at best, dubious legal history involving sexual harassment/rape, someone who has been quoted saying some pretty problematic sh*t about women, underage girls, his daughter (all separate occasions), and someone who cavorted with founder of a sex trafficking ring, did NOT have amything to do with said organization... and I was wrong."

I will applaud you louder than anyone else should that day come, my dude.
Click to expand...

We shall see
 
#3,990
#3,990
MontyPython said:
Hmmm... Perhaps. But calling a friend and "enigma"? Who does that. What was so puzzling about Epstein to Donald? Does this not strike you as code?

And the final sentence referencing "may every day be another wonderful secret"... WTF is that all about?

Again... Written within a naked girl outline w Trump's signature on her crotch and sent to a convicted pedophile.

Do tell...
Click to expand...
IMG_2141.jpeg
 
#3,991
#3,991
Vol8188 said:
Right. So if they were close, wouldn’t Trump have kept him around? If he had actual dirt on Trump involving underage girls, wouldn’t Trump have kept him around?
Click to expand...
Keep your friends close and enemies closer, eh? Perhaps.

Or maybe just have your enemy killed in prison during a 2:32 gap in the security tape coverage? But that's just wacky conspiracy theory of right-wing MAGA nutballs.
 
#3,992
#3,992
MontyPython said:
Keep your friends close and enemies closer, eh? Perhaps.

Or maybe just have your enemy killed in prison during a 2:32 gap in the security tape coverage? But that's just wacky conspiracy theory of right-wing MAGA nutballs.
Click to expand...

Why do you believe they were enemies? Isn’t your entire argument they were so close that they shared young girls together?
 
#3,994
#3,994
jmacvols1 said:
I did not say he had inside information, but IN GENERAL he understand when a person can and cannot be prosecuted based on given evidence and facts. His professional opinion there isn't evidence here for prosecution. Yet I am suppose to ignore what an expert says for the ravaging mob of conspiracy theorists who have no concern about facts or evidence but just want a list of names, guilty or not, to post and repost to make money.
Click to expand...

Nobody said ignore but you are going into 100% alignment with Trump's position by strategically cherry picking parts of a far right prosecutor who has stated he isn't privy and is making an educated guess.

For example, he went into great detail about how the proposed grand jury transcript release is a farce. Funny how you never pointed that out since that wouldnt make Trump/Bondi's transparency gesture look impressive. He saw through that charade immediately. This attempt at "transparency" makes me more skeptical than 72 hrs ago.

The reason why people are questioning it is because the Trump admin looks complicit with a coverup of something. The lies, the changing of the story, the cherry picked attempt at transparency.

Let's go back to Butler, PA. I was adamant the Biden admin showed a willful indifference/neglect to protecting Trump. It wasnt because of a conspiracy bent but it was because of the lies, the changing of the story, and the cherry picked comments. Guess what, the Biden admin was willfully indifferent to protecting Trump....
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, MercyPercy, ButchPlz and 1 other person
#3,995
#3,995
Vol8188 said:
Right. So if they were close, wouldn’t Trump have kept him around? If he had actual dirt on Trump involving underage girls, wouldn’t Trump have kept him around?
Click to expand...

This isn't the gotcha you think it is.

If you're hosting a gala, and your friend (who also happens to be your drug dealer) is caught doing rails in the bathroom, you have him kicked out. If you don't, what are the guests going to assume about you?

I'll hang up and listen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy
#3,998
#3,998
whodeycin85 said:
Even if that happened you will have most not believing what is released. Or if something isn't, as we have seen with no evidence and proof of the contrary people still think Trump is involved. Just because they are not getting the blood they want.
Click to expand...

I don't think Trump is implicated in child rape or the Ds would have released it. There might be some bad PR in there for him but overall, nothing that would be fatal politically.

But this administration isnt acting that way. The lies, the story changing, the cherry picked attempts at transparency. I compared this to the Ds response after Butler and it feels similar...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, tbh and Orangeslice13
#4,000
#4,000
BigOrangeMojo said:
I don't think Trump is implicated in child rape or the Ds would have released it. There might be some bad PR in there for him but overall, nothing that would be fatal politically.

But this administration isnt acting that way. The lies, the story changing, the cherry picked attempts at transparency. I compared this to the Ds response after Butler and it feels similar...
Click to expand...
Look at you. Try to apply consistent logic to politics.

It will never work
 
  • Like
Reactions: newokie03 and BigOrangeMojo
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top